9th Circuit rules California ban on marketing guns to minors is probably unconstitutional

[Flynn]

Quote

Writing for a unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, Circuit Judge Kenneth K. Lee wrote that while the ban may be intended to diminish gun violence, the “First Amendment demands more than good intentions and wishful thinking to warrant the government’s muzzling of speech.”

California allows minors to use guns under adult supervision for hunting and other activities, Lee wrote, and the state “cannot straitjacket the First Amendment by, on the one hand, allowing minors to possess and use firearms and then, on the other hand, banning truthful advertisements about that lawful use of firearms.”

.

.

.

.

 

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2023-09-13/9th-circuit-rules-california-ban-on-marketing-guns-to-minors-is-likely-unconstitutional

[mab22]

 Now they will try to ban the use of any arms for minors to try and get compliance with the ruling. It wouldn’t surprise me if Illinois to try to do the same thing. 
I don’t think the constitution has an age limit, other than the presidential requirements. 

[Flynn]

On 9/14/2023 at 8:13 AM, mab22 said:

 Now they will try to ban the use of any arms for minors to try and get compliance with the ruling. It wouldn’t surprise me if Illinois to try to do the same thing. 
I don’t think the constitution has an age limit, other than the presidential requirements. 

 

I had the same thought, but no way denying firearm use to those under 18 is in line with Bruen precedent...

[mab22]

 

On 9/14/2023 at 1:31 PM, Flynn said:

 

I had the same thought, but no way denying firearm use to those under 18 is in line with Bruen precedent...

 

Look at the failed state of Illinois, they have not had NYSRPA (Bruen) applied to them yet so they don't care. We are still waiting for Easterbrook and the Federal appeals court to accept NYSRPA (Bruen) and rule on the injunction in the parts case. I bet we don't hear from the appeals court till January 2024.

 

Elizabeth Warren, devout Socialist, explains what her party, the Democrats,  really wants, to completely disarm you in public then eventually the home.

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2023/09/12/warren-nm-gov-has-a-hard-job-because-extremist-scotus-wont-let-us-pass-good-policy-like-total-carry-ban/

 

[RANDY]

On 9/14/2023 at 2:02 PM, mab22 said:

 

 

Look at the failed state of Illinois, they have not had NYSRPA (Bruen) applied to them yet so they don't care. We are still waiting for Easterbrook and the Federal appeals court to accept NYSRPA (Bruen) and rule on the injunction in the parts case. I bet we don't hear from the appeals court till January 2024.

 

Elizabeth Warren, devout Socialist, explains what her party, the Democrats,  really wants, to completely disarm you in public then eventually the home.

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2023/09/12/warren-nm-gov-has-a-hard-job-because-extremist-scotus-wont-let-us-pass-good-policy-like-total-carry-ban/

 

Beem over a year and still don't have a ruling out of California or Maryland in the circuit courts after being remanded by Scotus in their AWB bans.