High capacity magazines

[vito]

As I understand the new law, sales are no longer legal for what are defined as "high capacity" magazines, but if we already have such there is no illegality in keeping them. Is this correct?

[2A4Cook]

That is my understanding, as well.  Try to keep receipts.

[ealcala31]

On 5/26/2023 at 2:06 PM, 2A4Cook said:

That is my understanding, as well.  Try to keep receipts.

That's what sucks, how is the state going to enforce the magazine ban? Are they going to request receipts during certain traffic stops? I sell quite a bit of my products at gun shows. Firearms ALWAYS get a receipt but accessories, rarely. I offer receipts to most of my customers at the gun shows but most of them refuse. I am betting there is going to be a significant amount of gun owners who don't have receipts for their "assault" parts. Then what: confiscation, arrest, confiscation & arrest? Can't wait to see how this unfolds next year...

[davel501]

The burden of proof is on the state to prove you acquired the banned item after the date. As long as you don't have something that didn't exist at the time they are going to have a hard time making their case. 

[2A4Cook]

On 5/26/2023 at 6:33 PM, davel501 said:

The burden of proof is on the state to prove you acquired the banned item after the date. As long as you don't have something that didn't exist at the time they are going to have a hard time making their case. 

True, but they'll still confiscate it, so you still lose.  And if they DO charge you even if they have no case, they can try to take your firearms, as well.  This tyrant state just doesn't care about the law, let alone our rights.

[davel501]

On 5/26/2023 at 6:38 PM, 2A4Cook said:

True, but they'll still confiscate it, so you still lose.  And if they DO charge you even if they have no case, they can try to take your firearms, as well.  This tyrant state just doesn't care about the law, let alone our rights.

 

I would spend the money to destroy those tyrants financially and professionally. I know that's not the choice everyone would make but people like us are out there. 

[Rmac702]

It's too bad you are considered guilty until you prove your own innocence.  Somehow that got twisted around over the past 30 years.

[Bitter Clinger]

So, can I still take my handgun with a 17 round mag to the range, at least until next year?

Can I bring my AR to the range with a 30 round mag, at least until next year?

 

I guess we really could use a list of what we can and cannot do at this point.

[Tvandermyde]

On 5/28/2023 at 6:50 AM, Bitter Clinger said:

So, can I still take my handgun with a 17 round mag to the range, at least until next year?

Can I bring my AR to the range with a 30 round mag, at least until next year?

 

I guess we really could use a list of what we can and cannot do at this point.

At this point you can take a "high cap" mag to the enumerated places in section 1.10 if unloaded and enclosed in a case as if they were a gun

you can keep them at home -- loaded or unloaded. 

 

you can not carry a gun with a high cap mag, and in my reading of the law that means any mag that can be converted to more than 15 rounds due to add on base plates or removeable base plates. intent is not a condition in the law. 

[John Q Public]

That's a can of worms because most basepads are removable and could be fitted with an extension and longer spring, so as written, virtually all mags can be extended.

[JTHunter]

On 5/26/2023 at 2:06 PM, 2A4Cook said:

That is my understanding, as well.  Try to keep receipts.

 

That's going to be hard when you bought them over 20 years ago.

[Bitter Clinger]

This "law" needs to be struck down.

The whole thing is ridiculous.