Molly B. Posted February 28, 2023 at 05:02 PM Author Posted February 28, 2023 at 05:02 PM Has Raoul appealed any of the cases to IL Supreme Court yet?
cybermgk Posted February 28, 2023 at 05:14 PM Posted February 28, 2023 at 05:14 PM Is this to be used as a consolidated thread for updates/news for the cases? If not could we have one? Cumbersome to keep checking the individual thread for each case, for updates and news.
Molly B. Posted February 28, 2023 at 05:30 PM Author Posted February 28, 2023 at 05:30 PM I've been trying to post up to date movement in the cases here - but leave the individual cases open for a lot of the discussion. Otherwise this topic could get huge and difficult to follow.
steveTA84 Posted February 28, 2023 at 06:03 PM Posted February 28, 2023 at 06:03 PM On 2/28/2023 at 11:02 AM, Molly B. said: Has Raoul appealed any of the cases to IL Supreme Court yet? Yes, the DeVore cases, and what a surprise! Starts of by interest balancing on 2A grounds, even though that’s irrelevant to the equal protections clause for why the TROs were granted https://s3.amazonaws.com/jnswire/jns-media/1f/74/12461244/129421_mot.pdf
Euler Posted March 1, 2023 at 07:47 PM Posted March 1, 2023 at 07:47 PM On 2/14/2023 at 6:45 PM, Molly B. said: ... These cases consolidated into other cases - week of 2/24/2023 IL - U.S. District Court, S.D., IL - Harrel v Raoul - consolidated with Barnett. ... IL - U.S. District Court S.D ,IL - FFL of IL v Pritzker - consolidated with Barnett. ... IL - U.S. District Court S.D ,IL - Langley v Kelly - consolidated with Barnett. ... ... Shouldn't these cases be unpinned, since all new developments should be posted to Barnett?
Molly B. Posted March 1, 2023 at 09:35 PM Author Posted March 1, 2023 at 09:35 PM Can anyone think of a good reason not to unpin them?
mauserme Posted March 1, 2023 at 10:12 PM Posted March 1, 2023 at 10:12 PM On 3/1/2023 at 3:35 PM, Molly B. said: Can anyone think of a good reason not to unpin them? As long as we have easily found links to those topics so we can find the history, unpinning them makes sense.
Molly B. Posted March 9, 2023 at 02:57 PM Author Posted March 9, 2023 at 02:57 PM IL - U.S.District Court, N.D. - Bevis v. City of Naperville - Appeal filed in U.S. 7th Appellate Court 3/7/2023 and motion filed for preliminary injunction. IL - U.S. District Court, N.D. Illinois - Kenneally v. Raoul - Motion for summary judgement filed by the state 03/03/2023. IL - U.S. District Court, E.D, - Herrera v Raoul - Motion hearing held. Motion for TRO and preliminary injunction 4 is taken under advisement. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) (Entered: 04/17/2023) IL - Illinois Appellate Court 5th District - Accuracy Firearms, et al v Pritzker - Defendant's Motion to Stay Proceedings, and Defendant's Motion to Dismiss set 3/21/23 10AM. IL- 6th Circuit Court District - Caulkins v Prizker - State filed appeal to Illinois Supreme Court 3/3/2023.
Molly B. Posted April 18, 2023 at 01:37 PM Author Posted April 18, 2023 at 01:37 PM Update on Herrera case: Motion hearing held. Motion for TRO and preliminary injunction 4 is taken under advisement. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) (Entered: 04/17/2023)
Molly B. Posted April 18, 2023 at 01:52 PM Author Posted April 18, 2023 at 01:52 PM Update posted for link to Bevis case which is now at the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals.
Euler Posted April 18, 2023 at 09:29 PM Posted April 18, 2023 at 09:29 PM On 4/18/2023 at 9:52 AM, Molly B. said: Update posted for link to Bevis case which is now at the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals. Only the motion for preliminary injunction is in the appellate court. The rest of the case is still in the district court. EDIT: Not anymore. The preliminary injunction was just denied. It's all in the district court now, unless Bevis petitions the US Supreme Court.
Molly B. Posted May 15, 2023 at 04:36 PM Author Posted May 15, 2023 at 04:36 PM IL Supreme Court - Caulkins v Pritzker - Rep. Dan Caulkins - gun/mag ban challenge. Oral argument will be scheduled for Tuesday, May 16, 2023 - 9:00 A: - Livestream link: https://livestream.com/blueroomstream/events/10839019
illinois_buckeye Posted May 17, 2023 at 03:22 PM Posted May 17, 2023 at 03:22 PM Is that what this is in reference to? Supreme Court leaves Illinois assault weapons ban in place (msn.com) Just checking as I'm no lawyer. So does this mean the court is leaving it up the 7th circuit 1st or are they totally done with the case or what?
gunuser17 Posted May 17, 2023 at 03:37 PM Posted May 17, 2023 at 03:37 PM This is the United States Supreme Court declining to intervene to enjoin the Naperville city gun ban ordinance while the case continues in the lower courts
Upholder Posted May 17, 2023 at 04:14 PM Posted May 17, 2023 at 04:14 PM On 5/17/2023 at 10:22 AM, illinois_buckeye said: Just checking as I'm no lawyer. So does this mean the court is leaving it up the 7th circuit 1st or are they totally done with the case or what? SCOTUS is declining to intervene at this time on the lack of a Preliminary Injunction in the Bevis v Naperville case. The normal course of the cases continues: 7th Circuit Court of Appeals hearings on the Preliminary Injunction and stay thereof continues. The District court proceedings on the merits of the case continue which could end up in Dismissals or Permanent Injunctions After those District courts are done, they will be appealed to the 7th Circuit which will likely hold hearings and issue rulings on the final disposition of the cases. After the 7th Circuit handles (or denies to hear) that appeal, it will likely be appealed back to SCOTUS SCOTUS may or may not accept that appeal.
ragsbo Posted May 17, 2023 at 08:55 PM Posted May 17, 2023 at 08:55 PM On 5/17/2023 at 11:14 AM, Upholder said: SCOTUS is declining to intervene at this time on the lack of a Preliminary Injunction in the Bevis v Naperville case. The normal course of the cases continues: 7th Circuit Court of Appeals hearings on the Preliminary Injunction and stay thereof continues. The District court proceedings on the merits of the case continue which could end up in Dismissals or Permanent Injunctions After those District courts are done, they will be appealed to the 7th Circuit which will likely hold hearings and issue rulings on the final disposition of the cases. After the 7th Circuit handles (or denies to hear) that appeal, it will likely be appealed back to SCOTUS SCOTUS may or may not accept that appeal. Which will take years to get done with the state asking for continuances after continuances all the time our rights being denied! AND the state is using OUR money to screw us over.
Yettiblood Posted May 17, 2023 at 09:06 PM Posted May 17, 2023 at 09:06 PM On 5/17/2023 at 3:55 PM, ragsbo said: Which will take years to get done with the state asking for continuances after continuances all the time our rights being denied! AND the state is using OUR money to screw us over. Yep. Years is the key word there.
TargetCollector Posted May 17, 2023 at 09:07 PM Posted May 17, 2023 at 09:07 PM On 5/17/2023 at 11:14 AM, Upholder said: SCOTUS is declining to intervene at this time on the lack of a Preliminary Injunction in the Bevis v Naperville case. The normal course of the cases continues: 7th Circuit Court of Appeals hearings on the Preliminary Injunction and stay thereof continues. The District court proceedings on the merits of the case continue which could end up in Dismissals or Permanent Injunctions After those District courts are done, they will be appealed to the 7th Circuit which will likely hold hearings and issue rulings on the final disposition of the cases. After the 7th Circuit handles (or denies to hear) that appeal, it will likely be appealed back to SCOTUS SCOTUS may or may not accept that appeal. One thing I keep losing the thread on is whether those district court proceedings are all now consolidated and if so, to which court and on what schedule. Do we have definitive information on that, at this point?
Upholder Posted May 17, 2023 at 09:11 PM Posted May 17, 2023 at 09:11 PM On 5/17/2023 at 4:07 PM, TargetCollector said: One thing I keep losing the thread on is whether those district court proceedings are all now consolidated and if so, to which court and on what schedule. Do we have definitive information on that, at this point? The 4 Southern District cases are consolidated with each other at the district level. The Naperville case is separate at the district level. The other Northern district case with the doctor is separate at the district level. You can check the dockets on the various threads for the latest scheduling information.
MrTriple Posted May 17, 2023 at 09:50 PM Posted May 17, 2023 at 09:50 PM On 5/17/2023 at 3:55 PM, ragsbo said: Which will take years to get done with the state asking for continuances after continuances all the time our rights being denied! AND the state is using OUR money to screw us over. We got a expedited hearing in the Barnett case at the Seventh Circuit. No continuances, everything must be in at three specific points in June, with a hearing at the end of the month.
ragsbo Posted May 17, 2023 at 11:39 PM Posted May 17, 2023 at 11:39 PM On 5/17/2023 at 4:50 PM, MrTriple said: We got a expedited hearing in the Barnett case at the Seventh Circuit. No continuances, everything must be in at three specific points in June, with a hearing at the end of the month. Yeah and I have ocean front property in Arizona for sell cheap! I have to actually see it to believe it
Molly B. Posted May 31, 2023 at 03:19 PM Author Posted May 31, 2023 at 03:19 PM Updating opening post - are the Keneally and Herrera cases also joined with Barnett now?
Euler Posted May 31, 2023 at 07:28 PM Posted May 31, 2023 at 07:28 PM On 5/31/2023 at 11:19 AM, Molly B. said: Updating opening post - are the Keneally and Herrera cases also joined with Barnett now? Kenneally isn't consolidated with anything. Herrera, Barnett, and Bevis are consolidated for the preliminary injunction appeal. They are still separate cases at the district level.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.