Molly B. Posted February 14, 2023 at 11:45 PM Share Posted February 14, 2023 at 11:45 PM Illinois Federal Lawsuits: IL - U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals - Barnett v Raoul - National Shooting Sports Foundation - challenging Gun/Mag ban. MOTION for Extension of Time granted, deadline for defendants to file a response is March 2, 2023. Harrel, FFL of IL, Langley, consolidated with Barnett as leading case. Oral Arguments April 12th. 4-28-2023: Judge McGlynn issued statewide preliminary injunction. State appeals injunction and also filed motion for stay on the injunction in U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals - Judge Easterbrook grants stay of the injunction. 7th Circuit sets expedited schedule: Briefs for the governmental parties are due June 5, 2023. Briefs for the plaintiffs are due June 19, 2023. Reply briefs, if any, are due June 26, 2023. Motions to extend these dates, or to allow late filings by amici curiae, will not be entertained. Oral argument set for Thursday, June 29, 2023, at 9:30 a.m. in the Main Courtroom, Room 2721, of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, 219 S. Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois. Each side limited to 45 minutes. IL - U.S. District Court, N.D. Illinois - Kenneally v. Raoul - McHenry Co. State's Attorney - challenge of gun/mag ban. Moved to federal court 1/27/2023. Motion for summary judgement filed by the state 03/03/2023.The plaintiff's response on the position of jurisdiction standing shall be filed by 5/1/2023. The defendants' reply shall be filed by 5/16/2023. IL - U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals - Bevis v. City of Naperville - National Assoc. of Gun Rights - Motion hearing held on 1/27/2023. Oral argument heard regarding Motion for Temporary Restraining. Plaintiffs added challenge the constitutionality of the "Protect Illinois Communities Act," HB5471. TRO denied by Judge Kendall, 2/17/2023. Appeal filed in U.S. 7th Appellate Court 3/7/2023. Case joined with Barnett v Raoul - oral arguments set for June 29, 2023. U.S. District Court, E.D, - Herrera v Raoul - Mr. Herrera files suit for himself, challenging the Gun/Mag ban. He is a doctor who also serves as a medic on a Chicagoland SWAT team. The virtual hearing on Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction reset to April 17, 2023 at 10 am.Motion hearing held. Motion for TRO and preliminary injunction 4 is taken under advisement. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) (Entered: 04/17/2023). Motion for a temporary restraining order and for a preliminary injunction 4 is denied 4-25-2023. IL - U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals - Bevis v. City of Naperville - National Assoc. of Gun Rights - Motion hearing held on 1/27/2023. Oral argument heard regarding Motion for Temporary Restraining. Plaintiffs added challenge the constitutionality of the "Protect Illinois Communities Act," HB5471. TRO denied by Judge Kendall, 2/17/2023. Appeal filed in U.S. 7th Appellate Court 3/7/2023. Case joined with Barnett v Raoul - oral arguments set for June 29, 2023. IL State Lawsuits: IL - Illinois Supreme Court - Accuracy Firearms, et al v Pritzker - Devore #1 allows temporary hold on state gun ban to stay in place for plaintiffs in lawsuit. 1/31/2023 Status hearing set for 02/22/2023 at 1:00 in courtroom D. Illinois Supreme Court issues order to consolidate Devore case 1, 2, and 3 into one case. Defendant's Motion to Stay Proceedings, and Defendant's Motion to Dismiss set 3/21/23 10AM.. , Motion to Stay Denied. Arguments heard on IL Sheriff Association and IL Association of Chiefs of Police Motion to Quash Subpoena. Motions to Quash granted on procedural grounds. Plaintiff granted leave to serve amended subpoenas. Substantive objections reserved and will be argued with discovery objections by Defendants on 5/4/23 1:00 PM via Zoom 358 873 0849. IL Supreme Court - Caulkins v Pritzker - Rep. Dan Caulkins - gun/mag ban challenge. TRO granted. 2/8/2023. State filed appeal to Illinois Supreme Court 3/3/2023. Motion for recusal of two judges denied. Oral argument will be scheduled for Tuesday, May 16, 2023 - 9:00 A: - Livestream link: https://livestream.com/blueroomstream/events/10839019. Waiting on ruling from IL Supreme Court. These cases consolidated into other cases - week of 2/24/2023 IL - U.S. District Court, S.D., IL - Harrel v Raoul - consolidated with Barnett. Second Amendment Foundation - challenges Gun/Mag ban. ORDER granting MOTION for Extension of Time - MOTION for Preliminary Injunction is due on or before March 1, 2023. Status conference scheduled for Friday, Feb 24 at 10am IL - U.S. District Court S.D ,IL - FFL of IL v Pritzker - consolidated with Barnett. FFL of IL - challenging Gun/Parts ban. Motion for preliminary injunction filed 2/6/2023. Feb 16, 2023 - ORDER denying 31 MOTION for Extension of Time. IL - U.S. District Court S.D ,IL - Langley v Kelly - consolidated with Barnett. Thomas Maag - MOTION for Extension of Time GRANTED. deadline for Motion for Preliminary Injunction extended to February 28, 2023 IL - 2nd Circuit Court District - Bailey v Pritzker - Devore #2 - Bailey, Niemerg, Wilhour et al gun/mag ban challenge.consolidated with Accuracy Firearms. TRO granted. 2/2/2023. Illinois Supreme Court issues order to combing Devore case 1, 2, and 3 into one case IL - 4th Circuit Court District - Devore #3 - consolidated with Accuracy Firearms. TRO granted - Attorney Tom Devore files motion to combine his 3 cases and Rep. Caulkins into one case. 2/14/2023. Denied. Illinois Supreme Court issues order to combining Devore case 1, 2, and 3 into one case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveTA84 Posted February 16, 2023 at 07:35 PM Share Posted February 16, 2023 at 07:35 PM Regarding all the cases under Judge McGylnn, he denied the state’s request for more time today. Get ready Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Posted February 16, 2023 at 08:30 PM Share Posted February 16, 2023 at 08:30 PM I am eager to see the "examples" they trot out. Having decades worth of time to put this list together I can fully understand why the judge wouldn't think they'd need even more time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
springfield shooter Posted February 16, 2023 at 08:51 PM Share Posted February 16, 2023 at 08:51 PM On 2/16/2023 at 2:30 PM, Jeffrey said: I am eager to see the "examples" they trot out. Having decades worth of time to put this list together I can fully understand why the judge wouldn't think they'd need even more time. Surely the people that wrote this carefully considered law for the state have not only a list, but also the "illustrative examples of each and every item banned" that Judge McGlynn has ordered them to produce. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Posted February 16, 2023 at 09:09 PM Share Posted February 16, 2023 at 09:09 PM On 2/16/2023 at 2:51 PM, springfield shooter said: Surely the people that wrote this carefully considered law for the state have not only a list, but also the "illustrative examples of each and every item banned" that Judge McGlynn has ordered them to produce. Without the purple you make a point. Who from that side will be able to produce all these items, legally? Will they have a shopping spree at PSA? Only to later be told they can't legally ship them? What about something like a Glock 17 from another thread I just read. The FFL isn't moving it for a member here because it is capable of holding more than 15. Will the defendants plan to bring that to court? Who owns it? I most look forward to them describing springs from a lower AR receiver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Euler Posted February 16, 2023 at 09:22 PM Share Posted February 16, 2023 at 09:22 PM On 2/16/2023 at 4:09 PM, Jeffrey said: ... Who from that side will be able to produce all these items, legally? Will they have a shopping spree at PSA? Only to later be told they can't legally ship them? ... They won't be bringing firearms themselves to court. Pictures will suffice. Not only is it easier to get pictures through a security checkpoint, but it's easier to make copies for everyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
solareclipse2 Posted February 16, 2023 at 11:02 PM Share Posted February 16, 2023 at 11:02 PM On 2/16/2023 at 3:22 PM, Euler said: They won't be bringing firearms themselves to court. Pictures will suffice. Not only is it easier to get pictures through a security checkpoint, but it's easier to make copies for everyone. Imagining them dropping what amounts a ream of paper on the table and the expression on the judges face. That'll get you through the day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Posted February 17, 2023 at 03:06 PM Share Posted February 17, 2023 at 03:06 PM On 2/16/2023 at 3:22 PM, Euler said: They won't be bringing firearms themselves to court. Pictures will suffice. Not only is it easier to get pictures through a security checkpoint, but it's easier to make copies for everyone. I'm sure they're securing every image they find related to anything guns. I guess I was hoping for another moment like when a NYC news caster had a 30 round magazine on live TV even though it was illegal for him to have where he was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrTriple Posted February 17, 2023 at 04:35 PM Share Posted February 17, 2023 at 04:35 PM On 2/16/2023 at 5:02 PM, solareclipse2 said: Imagining them dropping what amounts a ream of paper on the table and the expression on the judges face. That'll get you through the day. I see two paths forward for the state: The first is to do just that, which I suspect they won't because of the time involved, as well as how bad it would make them look in court. It would be an effective admission that the ban is overbroad. The second is to present images of "evil scary AR's" as their "inclusive" list and hope the judge buys it, which I suspect he won't based on the nature of his original request. To me, his request sounds deliberate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Molly B. Posted February 18, 2023 at 12:50 AM Author Share Posted February 18, 2023 at 12:50 AM TRO denied in Beavis v Plainfield. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrTriple Posted February 18, 2023 at 01:03 AM Share Posted February 18, 2023 at 01:03 AM On 2/17/2023 at 6:50 PM, Molly B. said: TRO denied in Beavis v Plainfield. Unfortunate, but the really important case is still Harrel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted February 18, 2023 at 01:08 AM Share Posted February 18, 2023 at 01:08 AM On 2/17/2023 at 6:50 PM, Molly B. said: TRO denied in Beavis v Plainfield. Bevis v Naperville 🤣🤣 Beavis and Butthead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveTA84 Posted February 18, 2023 at 01:24 AM Share Posted February 18, 2023 at 01:24 AM (edited) On 2/17/2023 at 6:50 PM, Molly B. said: TRO denied in Beavis v Plainfield. The judge’s ruling LOFL. My god....rubber bands were a factor in their order Edited February 18, 2023 at 01:26 AM by steveTA84 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
springfield shooter Posted February 18, 2023 at 02:02 AM Share Posted February 18, 2023 at 02:02 AM ".... and have a muzzle velocity "four times higher than a high-powered semiautomatic firearm." Is there any chance that she knows how impressively wrong this is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davel501 Posted February 18, 2023 at 02:51 AM Share Posted February 18, 2023 at 02:51 AM I'm hoping they appeal the tro ruling so she can get a hint. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveTA84 Posted February 18, 2023 at 03:15 AM Share Posted February 18, 2023 at 03:15 AM On 2/17/2023 at 8:51 PM, davel501 said: I'm hoping they appeal the tro ruling so she can get a hint. Oh they better, make this idiot 0-2 LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davel501 Posted February 18, 2023 at 03:31 AM Share Posted February 18, 2023 at 03:31 AM "To be faaaaair" 🤣 🤣 🤣 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Q Public Posted February 18, 2023 at 03:39 AM Share Posted February 18, 2023 at 03:39 AM Wow... clueless, is about all I could say after several type/deletes. JQ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweeper13 Posted February 18, 2023 at 04:30 PM Share Posted February 18, 2023 at 04:30 PM (edited) Virginia Mary Kendall (born January 25, 1962) is an American attorney and jurist serving as a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. President George W. Bush appointed her to the bench on January 3, 2006. In addition to serving on the bench, Judge Kendall is also a noted expert on child exploitation and human trafficking, as well as an adjunct law professor and author. Edited February 18, 2023 at 04:30 PM by Sweeper13 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Molly B. Posted February 18, 2023 at 05:10 PM Author Share Posted February 18, 2023 at 05:10 PM On 2/17/2023 at 7:08 PM, THE KING said: Bevis v Naperville 🤣🤣 Beavis and Butthead. 🤣 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiliconSorcerer Posted February 18, 2023 at 05:13 PM Share Posted February 18, 2023 at 05:13 PM Soon to be Bevis v Butthurt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Posted February 19, 2023 at 02:45 PM Share Posted February 19, 2023 at 02:45 PM On 2/17/2023 at 7:08 PM, THE KING said: Bevis v Naperville 🤣🤣 Beavis and Butthead. Can’t get it out of my head Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Talonap Posted February 19, 2023 at 03:53 PM Share Posted February 19, 2023 at 03:53 PM On 2/19/2023 at 8:45 AM, Jeffrey said: Can’t get it out of my head It was just a matter of time ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted February 19, 2023 at 04:07 PM Share Posted February 19, 2023 at 04:07 PM On 2/19/2023 at 8:45 AM, Jeffrey said: Can’t get it out of my head 🤣🤣👍 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hap Posted February 19, 2023 at 04:16 PM Share Posted February 19, 2023 at 04:16 PM On 2/18/2023 at 10:30 AM, Sweeper13 said: Virginia Mary Kendall (born January 25, 1962) is an American attorney and jurist serving as a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. President George W. Bush appointed her to the bench on January 3, 2006. In addition to serving on the bench, Judge Kendall is also a noted expert on child exploitation and human trafficking, as well as an adjunct law professor and author. At the time she was appointed, Republicans controlled the Senate. Thanks for nothing, George. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweeper13 Posted February 19, 2023 at 04:36 PM Share Posted February 19, 2023 at 04:36 PM Lets not forget how great Souter was, another Bush appointee. 🤢 Then retired under Obama and Sotomayor was put on the bench. Just great.😌 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveTA84 Posted February 24, 2023 at 06:15 PM Share Posted February 24, 2023 at 06:15 PM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Molly B. Posted February 25, 2023 at 03:50 PM Author Share Posted February 25, 2023 at 03:50 PM List updated with case consolidations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fxdpntc Posted February 25, 2023 at 05:05 PM Share Posted February 25, 2023 at 05:05 PM I don’t see anything. Using Safari. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Euler Posted February 25, 2023 at 09:55 PM Share Posted February 25, 2023 at 09:55 PM On 2/25/2023 at 10:50 AM, Molly B. said: List updated with case consolidations. On 2/25/2023 at 12:05 PM, fxdpntc said: I don’t see anything. Using Safari. She updated the opening post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now