Jump to content

Watterson v. BATFE (4:23-cv-00080) (E.D. Texas) - Pistol Brace rule


Upholder

Recommended Posts

Posted

Court order: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.219996/gov.uscourts.txed.219996.18.0.pdf

 

Quote

It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Emergency Motion for Expedited Consideration
of Plaintiff’s Motion for Relief Under 5 U.S.C. § 705 or, Alternatively, for a Preliminary
Injunction (Dkt. #8) is hereby GRANTED in part. It is further ORDERED that Defendants’
Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff’s Motion for Relief Under 5 U.S.C. § 705
or, Alternatively, for a Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. #11) is hereby GRANTED.

 

Posted

What granted in part means in this case:

 

Order said:

... in order to give proper consideration to this matter, the Court will decide Plaintiff's motion on an expedited basis but will set the deadline for the relevant order to be March 24, 2023. Relatedly, the Court finds that Defendants should be granted their requested extension to file a response ....

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...