steveTA84 Posted March 16, 2023 at 12:00 PM Share Posted March 16, 2023 at 12:00 PM (edited) Pritzker continuing to downplay judicial integrity concerns. Supreme Court censorship on Twitter addressed starting at 5:45 in Edited March 16, 2023 at 12:09 PM by steveTA84 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveTA84 Posted March 16, 2023 at 01:14 PM Share Posted March 16, 2023 at 01:14 PM Awesome interview regarding the judicial ethics in play and Pritzker’s idiotic excuse/response to this mess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiliconSorcerer Posted March 16, 2023 at 02:57 PM Share Posted March 16, 2023 at 02:57 PM On 3/16/2023 at 8:14 AM, steveTA84 said: Awesome interview regarding the judicial ethics in play and Pritzker’s idiotic excuse/response to this mess For the record... Bob Fioretti is violating the code of ethics for NOT reporting this to the bar! This is no different than a teacher being required report suspected sexual abuse of a child WHEREVER it is (in school, school year, regardless) they loose their license to teach! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Upholder Posted March 16, 2023 at 05:29 PM Share Posted March 16, 2023 at 05:29 PM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveTA84 Posted March 16, 2023 at 05:52 PM Share Posted March 16, 2023 at 05:52 PM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dumak_from_arfcom Posted March 16, 2023 at 06:48 PM Share Posted March 16, 2023 at 06:48 PM On 3/16/2023 at 12:52 PM, steveTA84 said: If Solomon picks it up, then it is just starting to get some national headway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveTA84 Posted March 16, 2023 at 09:14 PM Share Posted March 16, 2023 at 09:14 PM ^^^ yep!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve51 Posted March 17, 2023 at 01:54 AM Share Posted March 17, 2023 at 01:54 AM Only a complete moron would deny that this does not have an appearance of conflict. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveTA84 Posted March 17, 2023 at 01:58 AM Share Posted March 17, 2023 at 01:58 AM On 3/16/2023 at 8:54 PM, Steve51 said: Only a complete moron would deny that this does not have an appearance of conflict. Like this guy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve51 Posted March 17, 2023 at 02:03 AM Share Posted March 17, 2023 at 02:03 AM Yes! Illinois' top and biggest moron. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTHunter Posted March 17, 2023 at 02:48 AM Share Posted March 17, 2023 at 02:48 AM On 3/16/2023 at 9:03 PM, Steve51 said: Yes! Illinois' top and biggest moron. IL-ANNOY's version of POTUS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dumak_from_arfcom Posted March 17, 2023 at 06:08 AM Share Posted March 17, 2023 at 06:08 AM Todd V released a video tonight. ISP sent out guidance that the Caulkins court ruling of unconstitutional doesn't apply state wide and the ISP is still enforcing the AWB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jcable2 Posted March 17, 2023 at 04:39 PM Share Posted March 17, 2023 at 04:39 PM The state police have no backbone and will do exactly as JB tells them. The judge could come out this afternoon and say yes it applies state wide and they will still vow down to JB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiliconSorcerer Posted March 17, 2023 at 05:06 PM Share Posted March 17, 2023 at 05:06 PM On 3/17/2023 at 11:39 AM, jcable2 said: The state police have no backbone and will do exactly as JB tells them. The judge could come out this afternoon and say yes it applies state wide and they will still vow down to JB. Maybe we would just have to donate to his re-election campaign to get him to do this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Posted March 17, 2023 at 05:15 PM Share Posted March 17, 2023 at 05:15 PM On 3/17/2023 at 12:06 PM, SiliconSorcerer said: Maybe we would just have to donate to his re-election campaign to get him to do this? I already made one to Devore... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiliconSorcerer Posted March 17, 2023 at 05:33 PM Share Posted March 17, 2023 at 05:33 PM On 3/17/2023 at 12:15 PM, Jeffrey said: I already made one to Devore... If anything he would try and block the judge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mab22 Posted March 17, 2023 at 05:44 PM Share Posted March 17, 2023 at 05:44 PM On 3/17/2023 at 11:39 AM, jcable2 said: The state police have no backbone and will do exactly as JB tells them. The judge could come out this afternoon and say yes it applies state wide and they will still vow down to JB. The reason why it doesn't apply state wide has been posted a page or two prior to this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jcable2 Posted March 17, 2023 at 07:50 PM Share Posted March 17, 2023 at 07:50 PM On 3/17/2023 at 12:44 PM, mab22 said: The reason why it doesn't apply state wide has been posted a page or two prior to this. Devore, JB, the AG and State police are ignoring the definition of facially unconstitutional though with those opinions. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facial_challenge A law that has been declared facially unconstitutional completely voids the law as if it never existed. That is settled case law. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mab22 Posted March 17, 2023 at 09:08 PM Share Posted March 17, 2023 at 09:08 PM <sarcasm on> Maybe some people should march down to the ISP HQ, Governors office, AG office, and the IL Supreme Court to D E M A N D they uphold the county judge’s unconstitutional ruling. <sarcasm off> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveTA84 Posted March 20, 2023 at 01:26 PM Share Posted March 20, 2023 at 01:26 PM (edited) State Police and AG’s Office not releasing guidance post-decision. They’re redacting the guidance under “attorney/client privilege”. I’m leaning in the direction that this opens the door for potential further emergency litigation, as why would they redact guidelines of it was on the grounds of what they want? Edited March 20, 2023 at 01:26 PM by steveTA84 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yurimodin Posted March 20, 2023 at 04:09 PM Share Posted March 20, 2023 at 04:09 PM On 3/20/2023 at 8:26 AM, steveTA84 said: State Police and AG’s Office not releasing guidance post-decision. They’re redacting the guidance under “attorney/client privilege”. I’m leaning in the direction that this opens the door for potential further emergency litigation, as why would they redact guidelines of it was on the grounds of what they want? Can A/C privilege even be claimed if you have qualified immunity?????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveTA84 Posted March 20, 2023 at 04:32 PM Share Posted March 20, 2023 at 04:32 PM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Molly B. Posted March 20, 2023 at 05:59 PM Share Posted March 20, 2023 at 05:59 PM Where is the link to isp faq about the ban? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikew Posted March 20, 2023 at 06:34 PM Share Posted March 20, 2023 at 06:34 PM On 3/20/2023 at 12:59 PM, Molly B. said: Where is the link to isp faq about the ban? Of course it would not be on ISPFSB.com. https://isp.illinois.gov/Home/HB5471Faqs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Molly B. Posted March 20, 2023 at 07:57 PM Share Posted March 20, 2023 at 07:57 PM I know, I looked all over the fsb pages! Thank you, MikeW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mab22 Posted March 20, 2023 at 08:24 PM Share Posted March 20, 2023 at 08:24 PM Is the ISP even a defendant in the case, how could they claim attorney client privilege? They are not listed in the case. Perhaps this will be the next line that gets regurgitated every time someone files a FOIA now for any reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now