Caulkins v Prizker Recusal Thread

[mab22]

On 8/22/2023 at 7:35 PM, davel501 said:

 

They're all the same thing. Click bait meant to keep you watching the commercials. 

 

I thought you knew. 

No CNN and Mark Levin, Dan Bongino, Sean Hannity, the Siri’s XM Patriot channel  are NOT cnn and mslsd, your not even making an attempt. 
Wasting peoples time. 

[davel501]

On 8/22/2023 at 9:15 PM, mab22 said:

No CNN and Mark Levin, Dan Bongino, Sean Hannity, the Siri’s XM Patriot channel  are NOT cnn and mslsd, your not even making an attempt. 
Wasting peoples time. 

 

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

 

It's a free country. You do you. I'm just asking that you pick out a topic that one of them gets you really fired up about and go do your own research. Get to the root of the topic so you can explain it simply then tell me they weren't using Howard Stern's playbook on you. 

 

[mab22]

On 8/22/2023 at 10:32 PM, davel501 said:

 

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

 

It's a free country. You do you. I'm just asking that you pick out a topic that one of them gets you really fired up about and go do your own research. Get to the root of the topic so you can explain it simply then tell me they weren't using Howard Stern's playbook on you. 

 

You’re dumber than I thought, or a fed.
 BYE!

 

Edited August 23, 2023 at 04:06 AM by mab22

[steveTA84]

[Bird76Mojo]

Very nice Steve.. Well put together.

[JTHunter]

Steve - keep us posted as to what reply (if any) you get from the board.

[steveTA84]

On 8/23/2023 at 11:02 PM, JTHunter said:

Steve - keep us posted as to what reply (if any) you get from the board.

They will reply. I encourage others to also copy it in their own words and do the same 

[SiliconSorcerer]

Mine is in the mail as well. 

[steveTA84]

On 8/24/2023 at 1:45 PM, SiliconSorcerer said:

Mine is in the mail as well. 

How’s your laid out?

[steveTA84]

With what is uncovered it should be enough to force her to resign due to the election being over and just being seated

Edited August 27, 2023 at 09:09 PM by steveTA84

[steveTA84]

Here’s from the federal case that Pinchman filed and lost!!!! 
 

https://casetext.com/case/pincham-v-cunningham

 

JUSTICE GALLAGHER delivered the opinion of the court: 

Plaintiff, R. Eugene Pincham, appeals the order of the trial court dismissing his claim for declaratory relief. On appeal, plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in finding that his complaint for declaratory relief presented no controversy that was ripe for adjudication. We affirm. 

On January 31, 1987, while a sitting justice of the Illinois Appellate Court, plaintiff gave a speech at the headquarters of Operation PUSH. During this speech, plaintiff made comments related to the upcoming mayoral election involving Harold Washington. 

As a justice of the Illinois Appellate Court, plaintiff was bound by the Code of Judicial Conduct. At the time of plaintiff's speech, Illinois Supreme Court Rules 67(A)(2) and (A)(4) provided as follows: 

 

"(2) A judge may not, except when a candidate for office or retention, participate in political campaigns or activities, or make political contributions.

 

* * * 

 

(4) A judge should not engage in any other political activity except on behalf of measures to improve the law, the legal system, or the administration of justice." 134 Ill.2d Rs. 67(A)(2), (A)(4).

 

On February 23, 1987, plaintiff received a letter from the Judicial Inquiry Board (the Board). The letter notified plaintiff that the Board sought to determine whether there was a reasonable basis to bring charges against plaintiff for certain remarks he made at the Operation PUSH forum.

[SiliconSorcerer]

On 8/27/2023 at 12:08 PM, steveTA84 said:

How’s your laid out?

Not a h.. of. a lot different. 

[steveTA84]

Hey everyone a judge recused herself from a gun case because of a potential appearance of bias 

 

https://x.com/cboyack/status/1696630944604524789?s=46&t=ZJIYNr-TwO9eZdQE_UykAg

 

Meanwhile, nothing has been done yet regarding new developments and Justice Rochford. What the heck are Stocks and Caulkins waiting for?

[steveTA84]

[JTHunter]

On 8/30/2023 at 3:25 PM, steveTA84 said:

 

A "standard form letter", about all that can be expected in IL-ANNOY.  

[steveTA84]

This woman just can’t stop lol!

 

yet another canon violation by speaking at a partisan event 

 

posted 18 hours ago 

 

 

click the link and you see they were like “shoot! Not good! Abort abort abort!” Google didn’t refresh yet though

 

 

What’s  the event all about?

 

[steveTA84]

It’s a fundraiser for the Democratic party!!!!

 

https://secure.actblue.com/donate/lcdw2023gala

[RECarry]

^^^ Doesn't sound very diverse or inclusive.  The Karen Konformity Kult is more like it.

 

"Resist" against what?  "Insist" for what purpose?  "Persist" against whom?   

 

And why fundraise at all when Elizabeth Rochford is riding that cool million from Pritzker?

[steveTA84]

On 9/6/2023 at 8:06 PM, RECarry said:

^^^ Doesn't sound very diverse or inclusive.  The Karen Konformity Kult is more like it.

 

"Resist" against what?  "Insist" for what purpose?  "Persist" against whom?   

 

And why fundraise at all when Elizabeth Rochford is riding that cool million from Pritzker?

Ahahahahahahahaahaaha!!!!!!

 

https://www.ija.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=329:2021-2--a-judge-s-participation-in-a-political-party-s-fundraising-event-as-a-guest-of-honor&catid=23:opinions&Itemid=139

 

IJEC Opinion No. 2021-2

Topic: A judge’s participation in a political party’s fundraising event as a guest of honor.

Digest: Only a judge running for election or a judicial candidate may be a guest of honor at a political party’s fundraiser.

 

The Illinois Code of Judicial Conduct, Rule 65 B, permits a judge or judicial candidate to be a guest of honor at a fundraising event for an organization. IJEC 2010-01. Doing so inherently involves political activity. Accordingly, this provision prohibits an incumbent judge from appearing as a guest of honor at a political fundraising event. Rule 67 B (1)(a) (ii) and (iii) and b(1) and (2) and C address improper political activity by judges or candidates for judge. These sections allow judges running for office and judicial candidates to engage in political activity related to their election.  Therefore, they may be a guest of honor at political party’s fundraising event, but only during the period proscribed for electioneering.

 

While Rule 65 B permits a judge to be the “guest of honor at an organization’s fundraising events” a political party’s fundraising event do not fall within the Rule.

Edited September 7, 2023 at 01:27 AM by steveTA84

[steveTA84]

On 9/6/2023 at 5:30 PM, steveTA84 said:

It’s a fundraiser for the Democratic party!!!!

 

https://secure.actblue.com/donate/lcdw2023gala

She’s a sitting justice speaking as an event in which she is not a candidate that raising money for Democrat candidates for office. Yet ANOTHER blatant ethics violation in itself that warrants a new round of inquiry board complaints 

[steveTA84]

Lake County Dems deleted the event from their website, but still up on Google  that it was listed 

 

[steveTA84]

Ok gets better. She’s speaking at a partisan Democratic Party fundraiser, as a sitting justice not up for retention, which is raising funds for Lake County Democratic candidates, and doing so for an org that endorsed her for her run. You can’t make this up!!!!!

https://www.lakedemwomen.org/class-of-2022-

[Jeffrey]

I wonder what she is being told behind closed doors because you can bet your ace that BJ, er JB rather, is working the strings.  She's a smart enough woman to have made it up the ladder.  She can't be this stupid to think she will get away with it all.  Probably already has the deal worked out.

[steveTA84]

On 9/7/2023 at 1:13 PM, Jeffrey said:

I wonder what she is being told behind closed doors because you can bet your ace that BJ, er JB rather, is working the strings.  She's a smart enough woman to have made it up the ladder.  She can't be this stupid to think she will get away with it all.  Probably already has the deal worked out.

Who knows, but it’s beyond just simple conflicts of interests that have happened since being sworn in  

[Jeffrey]

On 9/7/2023 at 1:24 PM, steveTA84 said:

Who knows, but it’s beyond just simple conflicts of interests that have happened since being sworn in  

That's what makes me think she has another deal already worked when this finally implodes, assuming it does.  

[steveTA84]

On 9/7/2023 at 3:14 PM, Jeffrey said:

That's what makes me think she has another deal already worked when this finally implodes, assuming it does.  

It can, it just needs to be made a big deal of publicly, which is frustrating cuz Stocks and DeVore are silent on this stuff, as are the pro-2A groups 

[steveTA84]

The event she’s speaking at at 9/9 falls

into the highlighted, but also, as a sitting Judge AND Supreme Court candidate in 2022…..

[steveTA84]

With the new Rochford stuff, it has  triggered even people from other states to start writing to the Judicial Inquiry Board sending letters with this documented “abuse of office”

[steveTA84]

On 9/6/2023 at 5:30 PM, steveTA84 said:

It’s a fundraiser for the Democratic party!!!!

 

https://secure.actblue.com/donate/lcdw2023gala

And she showed up!  Thank you, idiot democratic women, for documenting that she did in fact go and speak 

[steveTA84]

Yes! LOFL