mab22 Posted January 5, 2023 at 10:56 PM Share Posted January 5, 2023 at 10:56 PM Done Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F12Mahon Posted January 5, 2023 at 11:03 PM Share Posted January 5, 2023 at 11:03 PM I'm not seeing House Amendment 2. ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScopeEye Posted January 5, 2023 at 11:08 PM Share Posted January 5, 2023 at 11:08 PM I'm in Also called reps today as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yettiblood Posted January 5, 2023 at 11:09 PM Share Posted January 5, 2023 at 11:09 PM Done Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Q Public Posted January 5, 2023 at 11:12 PM Share Posted January 5, 2023 at 11:12 PM (edited) On 1/5/2023 at 4:48 PM, mab22 said: I would prefer to donate funds when something is filed. I would prefer the money is there to file, not a determining factor, but I respect your right to make your own determination. Edited January 5, 2023 at 11:13 PM by John Q Public Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stockboyy Posted January 5, 2023 at 11:16 PM Share Posted January 5, 2023 at 11:16 PM done x2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djmarkla Posted January 5, 2023 at 11:40 PM Share Posted January 5, 2023 at 11:40 PM Filed the slip now and made phone calls this afternoon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedBarchetta Posted January 5, 2023 at 11:49 PM Share Posted January 5, 2023 at 11:49 PM Done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gp17 Posted January 6, 2023 at 12:02 AM Share Posted January 6, 2023 at 12:02 AM The antis are on it now. But still way behind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveIL Posted January 6, 2023 at 12:03 AM Share Posted January 6, 2023 at 12:03 AM Completed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mauserme Posted January 6, 2023 at 12:26 AM Author Share Posted January 6, 2023 at 12:26 AM On 1/5/2023 at 5:03 PM, F12Mahon said: I'm not seeing House Amendment 2. ?? It's HFA2. It actually defaults to that option. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cybermgk Posted January 6, 2023 at 12:28 AM Share Posted January 6, 2023 at 12:28 AM Done, done, done and done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bear226 Posted January 6, 2023 at 12:32 AM Share Posted January 6, 2023 at 12:32 AM done Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hawkeye Posted January 6, 2023 at 12:43 AM Share Posted January 6, 2023 at 12:43 AM Done! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cybermgk Posted January 6, 2023 at 12:44 AM Share Posted January 6, 2023 at 12:44 AM (edited) So, is the only difference on this bill from the House one, is a change from more than 10 to more than 12 as definition of large cap mag, removal of 18-20 yo prohibition AND the addition of a FOID Assault Weapons endorsement provision? Edited January 6, 2023 at 12:48 AM by cybermgk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kk5 Posted January 6, 2023 at 12:49 AM Share Posted January 6, 2023 at 12:49 AM Done Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marie Posted January 6, 2023 at 01:05 AM Share Posted January 6, 2023 at 01:05 AM Done Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tricolor Posted January 6, 2023 at 01:09 AM Share Posted January 6, 2023 at 01:09 AM On 1/5/2023 at 6:44 PM, cybermgk said: So, is the only difference on this bill from the House one, is a change from more than 10 to more than 12 as definition of large cap mag, removal of 18-20 yo prohibition AND the addition of a FOID Assault Weapons endorsement provision? That's what I'm seeing so far too. Amazing that they are still talking like interest balancing is at all relevant to a bruen analysis... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keith44 Posted January 6, 2023 at 01:37 AM Share Posted January 6, 2023 at 01:37 AM Done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papa Posted January 6, 2023 at 01:39 AM Share Posted January 6, 2023 at 01:39 AM Done Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FarmHand357 Posted January 6, 2023 at 02:49 AM Share Posted January 6, 2023 at 02:49 AM So far the numbers are looking good in our favor, for what that's worth... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spanishjames Posted January 6, 2023 at 03:32 AM Share Posted January 6, 2023 at 03:32 AM Who'd be against "Amusement Ride Safety"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thepointbeing Posted January 6, 2023 at 03:42 AM Share Posted January 6, 2023 at 03:42 AM done Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dumak_from_arfcom Posted January 6, 2023 at 03:42 AM Share Posted January 6, 2023 at 03:42 AM On 1/5/2023 at 7:09 PM, tricolor said: That's what I'm seeing so far too. Amazing that they are still talking like interest balancing is at all relevant to a bruen analysis... The case examples moving their way through the courts are making it clear, they are just going to pretend that nothing they are doing applies to Bruen, and continue to interest balance. We need to make sure the legal team that challenges this doesn't engage in any interest balancing arguments in any briefs or oral arguments. I believe one of the reps on our side clearly fell into an interest balancing argument in the committee hearing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrTriple Posted January 6, 2023 at 03:49 AM Share Posted January 6, 2023 at 03:49 AM On 1/5/2023 at 9:42 PM, Dumak_from_arfcom said: The case examples moving their way through the courts are making it clear, they are just going to pretend that nothing they are doing applies to Bruen, and continue to interest balance. We need to make sure the legal team that challenges this doesn't engage in any interest balancing arguments in any briefs or oral arguments. I believe one of the reps on our side clearly fell into an interest balancing argument in the committee hearing. The filing submitted by the plaintiffs in the NAGR/Naperville case were excellent in that regard: Stuck to Bruen, reiterated Heller where applicable, and kept hammering home the key points, especially on where Naperville was wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangerdeepv Posted January 6, 2023 at 04:09 AM Share Posted January 6, 2023 at 04:09 AM Done Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
russ60477 Posted January 6, 2023 at 04:22 AM Share Posted January 6, 2023 at 04:22 AM Done and wife also done one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mab22 Posted January 6, 2023 at 05:20 AM Share Posted January 6, 2023 at 05:20 AM On 1/5/2023 at 9:32 PM, spanishjames said: Who'd be against "Amusement Ride Safety"? This is what is pissing me off even more, that they are such PUSILLANIMOUS MARXISTS that they have to hide it, like little children not bold brave men and women, in a amusement safety act bill. WEAK! if you want the definition go here - https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pusillanimous Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
howie Posted January 6, 2023 at 06:35 AM Share Posted January 6, 2023 at 06:35 AM Done x 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NonDescript Posted January 6, 2023 at 07:51 AM Share Posted January 6, 2023 at 07:51 AM Done! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now