Flynn Posted December 20, 2022 at 09:59 PM Share Posted December 20, 2022 at 09:59 PM On 12/20/2022 at 8:06 AM, apmonte said: There's never been compromise in IL. Compromise doesn't mean that we negotiate how much of our rights we give away. Compromise implies that both parties get something that they want. If you want to negotiate further "reasonable" restrictions, then I expect IL to do away with the FOID system, or allow suppressors, or non-resident CCW, or other significant improvement in existing gun rights. Otherwise, just say no, and we'll see you in court. Sorry, but I have said since day one, my rights are not on the table for compromise, negotiations or giveaways (thus the reason I stopped giving anything to many 2nd groups) I refuse to forfeit any of my protected rights even if some consider them 'reasonable' forfeitures. With Miller/Heller/McDonald/Bruen making it clear the the 2nd is a personal civil right of all, I say see you in court, the only restrictions I will tollerate will be those the Supreme Court deems appropriate under their new precedent, I refuse any restrictions the legislature, FUDDs or whomever deems 'reasonable' as I do not find any Constitutional restrictions reasonable especially if part of my rights are being bargained to restore another part of my rights that they had no business denying in the first place and should be restored unconditionally. The time for compromise and negotiations over 2nd infringments is over as far as I'm concerned. And it's time the end cut-outs as well, they are IMO modern day Jim Crow laws, I don't care what your day job was or is, you should enjoy more 2nd rights than others, that is not how rights are supposed to work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!Register a new account
Already have an account? Sign in here.Sign In Now