Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...
Posted
At the September 5 status hearing, the judge set the following schedule:

10/16: defendants' response to the amended complaint due
11/06: joint status report with proposed briefing schedule due
  • 2 months later...
Posted
On November 6, the judge set the following schedule.

12/01: Disclosures to be exchanged

2025
04/30: End of fact discovery
05/07: Status hearing
05/16: Initial expert disclosures due
06/13: Responsive expert disclosures due
07/15: Rebuttal expert disclosures due
08/31: Depositions of experts concluded
  • 4 months later...
Posted (edited)
On April 7, the judge granted the motion to stay and set the following schedule:

07/28: joint status report due
07/31: status hearing

All other previously scheduled items are canceled.

Edited by Euler
  • 3 months later...
Posted
On July 29, based on the status report, the judge ordered the case to remain stayed. The status meeting on July 31 is canceled. The schedule is set as follows:

12/15: joint status report due
12/17: status hearing
Posted

They will get more extensions as Christmas is 7 days later, and New Years Eve is 14 days later, they just won't have the time to prepare with all the holiday stuff going on.

They won't be able to get together until after Valentines day at the soonest as they have to have time to recover from the holiday backlogs. 
Your tax money hard at work...  

Posted
On 8/7/2025 at 8:34 AM, mab22 said:

They will get more extensions as Christmas is 7 days later, and New Years Eve is 14 days later, they just won't have the time to prepare with all the holiday stuff going on.

They won't be able to get together until after Valentines day at the soonest as they have to have time to recover from the holiday backlogs. 
Your tax money hard at work...  

Delays are almost as good as winning the cases, this is why we need a stay on all these unconstitutional laws until they have been ran through the whole courts system. Then the state would be in a hurry to get it done. 

Posted
On 8/7/2025 at 3:11 PM, Jeffrey said:

I wish my customers allowed me to just keep pushing due dates back over and over and over.  .Gov is the worst run business on the planet.

That’s because it’s OPM, Other Peoples Money. If their paychecks depended upon efficiency, like a regular business entity, that would matter, until then….”Good enough for government work.” (Look! the money fairy just keeps delivering)

  • 10 months later...
Posted
On June 12, Bevis submitted a joint status report, which states that a ruling on Barnett is still pending in the 7th Circuit and requests a continuation of the stay in this case accordingly.
  • 1 month later...
Posted
On July 13, the judge ordered parties to file a joint status report within 10 days of a decision in Barnett or by November 13, whichever is earlier.

If Barnett petitions the Supreme Court, the circuit court will delay notification to the district court.
Posted
On 7/16/2026 at 2:24 PM, Euler said:

On July 13, the judge ordered parties to file a joint status report within 10 days of a decision in Barnett or by November 13, whichever is earlier.

If Barnett petitions the Supreme Court, the circuit court will delay notification to the district court.

 

NSSF says they plan to do that:

 

"WASHINGTON, D.C. — NSSF®, The Firearm Industry Trade Association, is disappointed by the decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Barnett v. Raoul. NSSF respectfully disagrees with the Court’s decision to reverse and remand a lower court’s ruling ...

 

NSSF is a plaintiff in this case and plans on filing a cert petition with the U.S. Supreme Court.

..."

 

 

 

Posted
On July 20, the judge granted the motion to stay pending an opinion in Viramontes and ordered parties to file a joint status report within 10 days of the disposition of Viramontes or November 13, whichever is earlier.

November 13 will be earlier. The Supreme Court won't even have heard Viramontes by November 13.
Posted
On 7/20/2026 at 9:10 PM, Euler said:

On July 20, the judge granted the motion to stay pending an opinion in Viramontes and ordered parties to file a joint status report within 10 days of the disposition of Viramontes or November 13, whichever is earlier.

November 13 will be earlier. The Supreme Court won't even have heard Viramontes by November 13.

Supreme Court shouldn't even have to hear it to write the option, I hope they are working on writing already ;) 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...