mauserme Posted August 27, 2022 at 09:07 PM Share Posted August 27, 2022 at 09:07 PM ... if Democrats elect two more Senators (@ 0:20 seconds): Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2A4Cook Posted August 27, 2022 at 10:08 PM Share Posted August 27, 2022 at 10:08 PM Screw that illegitimate dictator. SCOTUS rulings meaning NOTHING to these people but something to flip the bird at. They just brazenly do whatever they damned-well please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveTA84 Posted August 27, 2022 at 11:32 PM Share Posted August 27, 2022 at 11:32 PM That’s nice Joe. No one cares. Go get a diaper change and take your Razadyne Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sctman800 Posted August 28, 2022 at 08:26 AM Share Posted August 28, 2022 at 08:26 AM What I like in his speech is the last words, "We'll make sure no one can steal an election AGAIN." Kind of a Freudian slip? Jim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bubbacs Posted August 28, 2022 at 04:13 PM Share Posted August 28, 2022 at 04:13 PM Ban don’t ban. Can ban can’t ban. At the end of the day it’s all chest thumping and wanker waving. Just do it already or STFU. *****This message brought to you by the STFU Joe Biden Foundation***** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illinois_buckeye Posted August 28, 2022 at 06:55 PM Share Posted August 28, 2022 at 06:55 PM Personally I think scotus should be in charge of the doj or at least the federal marshals to where if politicians introduce bills that are against the court’s rulings then they would have a way to enforce. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flynn Posted August 29, 2022 at 04:14 AM Share Posted August 29, 2022 at 04:14 AM Personally I'm of the opinion, based on the Dobbs ruling, that Roe can't lawfully be codified at the Federal level for the same reasons Roe was overturned, it's a state right to decide and is not in the purview of the Federal government since it's not a right. And based on the Bruen ruling, no way an assualt weapon ban is lawful either. That said, I have little doubt the Democrats will go full steam into passing or trying to pass numerous unconstituional laws since they are unhappy with the way the Supreme Court ruled, something they are not used to having to deal with as the courts have been favoring them for decades on the hot button issues. "...and make no, make sure, no one, no one, has the opportunity to steal an election again" He said what he wasn't supposed to again... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G214me Posted August 29, 2022 at 08:58 AM Share Posted August 29, 2022 at 08:58 AM The puppet is even farther gone than anyone thought if he actually thinks the Democrats are going to to keep the Senate let alone gain 2 seats. WOW !!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTX63 Posted August 29, 2022 at 12:49 PM Share Posted August 29, 2022 at 12:49 PM Actions taken by the White House and 3 letter agencies without any consideration of legal or constitutional authority just seems like a day to day thing now. There was a time, not that long ago, that immediate push back and oversight were present; recently it only seemed to occur when Trump was in office. Everything he did was opposed thru hook or crook. Now, everytime a new fiat is proclaimed, we look around waiting for someone we elected or is in charge of scrutinizing such acts and they are no where to be found, other than on tv. No court, no agency seems to do anything. It is all about sternly worded letters and promises to fix things if they are just reelected. Investigations that go nowhere, buried and forgotten by the next proclamation, scandal, or national emergency. Presidents have legal teams that advise on the constitutionality and survivability of an order; I doubt those currently in charge care much. You want to fight us and oppose forgiving student debt? Go ahead. See you in November. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cybermgk Posted August 29, 2022 at 03:04 PM Share Posted August 29, 2022 at 03:04 PM It means there aren't the votes in the Senate. Though I think he needs more than 2 more Senators, it would still be a 60 vote bill. IMHO, the AWB bill was 100% political, meant to be a Nov tool to rally their base. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illinois_buckeye Posted August 29, 2022 at 03:33 PM Share Posted August 29, 2022 at 03:33 PM Just like the school loans. Which I heard a very interesting take on that today. The radio host made the comment, could it be they trotted out the idea of forgiving 10,000 in school loans, knowing that idea will be struck down in court, then use that to bash republicans to say how mean and hateful republicans are for not wanting to help with school loans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bubbacs Posted August 29, 2022 at 05:28 PM Share Posted August 29, 2022 at 05:28 PM Hard to say it's the Republicans when Fancy Nancy has already said it's against the law! Last I saw she was a Democrat! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cybermgk Posted August 29, 2022 at 07:13 PM Share Posted August 29, 2022 at 07:13 PM On 8/29/2022 at 10:33 AM, illinois_buckeye said: Just like the school loans. Which I heard a very interesting take on that today. The radio host made the comment, could it be they trotted out the idea of forgiving 10,000 in school loans, knowing that idea will be struck down in court, then use that to bash republicans to say how mean and hateful republicans are for not wanting to help with school loans. Wrong target. They want to pack the court. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illinois_buckeye Posted August 29, 2022 at 07:42 PM Share Posted August 29, 2022 at 07:42 PM Oh I’m sure they do. But they are probably also thinking up anything to buy votes come November. Think about it this way, if you were one of the people who though all or part of your school loan would be forgiven, then a court case would say the administration can’t do that, if I were someone without morals or conviction and I wanted to buy votes, then I’d probably be saying see the republicans don’t want you to have a better life and try to project that republicans were simply out to step on the little people. I don’t feel that way, but just thinking through if I were on the other side, that reasoning makes sense because then you didn’t give up the money but you still get to attack your opponents. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDW Posted August 29, 2022 at 09:04 PM Share Posted August 29, 2022 at 09:04 PM We sure do live in interesting times. I think of them as a full time nightmare. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.