Jump to content

A Good Guy vs. A Bad Guy


ILgunguy
 Share

Recommended Posts

A convenience store owner in CA stopped an armed robbery by shooting the would-be robber armed with an AR-style rifle by using his own shotgun.   

 

“In this case, a lawfully armed member of our community prevented a violent crime and ensured their own safety, while being confronted with multiple armed suspects,” Riverside County Sheriff’s said in a press release.

 

New York Post : California liquor store owner shoots would-be robber.
https://nypost.com/2022/08/02/california-liquor-store-owner-shoots-would-be-armed-robber/

 

KTLA Los Angeles: Caught on video: Norco store owner blasts armed robber with shotgun; 3 arrested.
https://ktla.com/news/local-news/caught-on-video-store-owner-shotgun-blast/

 

 

Edited by ILgunguy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The sherriff's statement is pretty definitive, but it would not surprise me in the slightest that anti's would spin this if given the chance.  

 

Here are the details they would have to work with:

- Lawfully armed store owner vs illegally armed criminal (with stolen firearms)

- Store owner acts to defend life and safety vs a criminal acting with disregard for innocent life and safety through violent, sociopathic behavior

- Multiple armed attackers (only 1  made it inside the store before shots were fired)

- The criminal had means, motive, and opportunity (verbal commands to store owner while pointing the rifle,  steps taken to conceal identity) to commit a violent act and was doing so

- The store owner successfully defended his life, and the bad guys got arrested and the one is still in the hospital

 

Still, to the antis this will matter little "because guns!".  smh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/2/2022 at 6:11 AM, ILgunguy said:

The sherriff's statement is pretty definitive, but it would not surprise me in the slightest that anti's would spin this if given the chance.  

 

Here are the details they would have to work with:

- Lawfully armed store owner vs illegally armed criminal (with stolen firearms)

- Store owner acts to defend life and safety vs a criminal acting with disregard for innocent life and safety through violent, sociopathic behavior

- Multiple armed attackers (only 1  made it inside the store before shots were fired)

- The criminal had means, motive, and opportunity (verbal commands to store owner while pointing the rifle,  steps taken to conceal identity) to commit a violent act and was doing so

- The store owner successfully defended his life, and the bad guys got arrested and the one is still in the hospital

 

Still, to the antis this will matter little "because guns!".  smh

 

Obviously the AR-style rifle is too unwieldy and a shotgun is all you need for self-defense!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...