Jump to content

House Committee Approves "Assault Weapons" Ban


mauserme

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/house-committee-approves-first-assault-weapons-ban-bill-decades

 

 

House committee approves first assault weapons ban bill in decades

By Brie Stimson | Fox News

 

The House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday moved a bill banning assault weapons forward but it’s unclear if the legislation has enough support to pass a floor vote. 

 

Democratic Reps. Jared Golden, D-Maine, and Henry Cuellar, D-Texas have said they won’t support the bill while Republican Reps. Chris Jacobs, R-N.Y., and Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., have said they are open to voting for a ban, according to The Hill. House Democrats have a four-vote margin. 

 

The Assault Weapons Ban of 2021 was advanced in a 25-18 vote but a date for a vote on the House floor has not been set. 

...

Ranking member Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, argued the bill would take away upstanding gun owners’ rights.

 

"Democrats know this legislation will not reduce violent crime or reduce the likelihood of mass shootings, but they are obsessed with attacking law-abiding Americans’ Second Amendment liberties," he said. 

...

President Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris have also been calling for an assault weapons ban. 

"Assault weapons need to be banned," Biden said last week ....

 

 

 

 

  • mauserme changed the title to House Committee Approves "Assault Weapons" Ban
Posted
On 7/21/2022 at 9:03 AM, Ranger said:

They know this is unlikely to withstand SCOTUS; but believe it will help them win votes and keep majorities this fall.  I hope they are wrong abou tthat.

 

If it gets that far, it won't get 60 votes for cloture in the Senate. Matter of fact, I don't think it would get 50.

 

But I believe you are correct, it's about political theater.

Posted

It likely never goes for a vote in the Senate.  Schumer knows it won't pass Filibuster.  He's been historically against 'on the record' useless votes when they can hurt elections of his side, AND he knows there are a few Dem Senators, that will be hurt in November IF they are forced to vote on it, on the record.

Posted
On 7/21/2022 at 9:29 AM, cybermgk said:

It likely never goes for a vote in the Senate.  Schumer knows it won't pass Filibuster.  He's been historically against 'on the record' useless votes when they can hurt elections of his side, AND he knows there are a few Dem Senators, that will be hurt in November IF they are forced to vote on it, on the record.

 

Yep, it's all election cycle grandstanding, and anyone stupid enough to fall for it is just stupid.  They know it is basically dead in the Senate but they will jump up and down like petulant children screaming 'We Tried, it's the Republican's fault' trying to gain votes and pushing for the filibuster to be abolished instead of admitting their policies are not nearly as popular as they believe.

Posted
On 7/21/2022 at 5:52 PM, Flynn said:

 

Yep, it's all election cycle grandstanding, and anyone stupid enough to fall for it is just stupid.  They know it is basically dead in the Senate but they will jump up and down like petulant children screaming 'We Tried, it's the Republican's fault' trying to gain votes and pushing for the filibuster to be abolished instead of admitting their policies are not nearly as popular as they believe.

Yep.  They will lie about the content of the bills, then try to use it to pressure Manchin and Sinema to eliminate the Filibuster.  That and it's meant to motivate their core base and some suburban woman.  I think it may hurt them as much as it helps in those regards.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...