Jump to content

James Miller vs Rob Bonta, California AWB challenge


Recommended Posts

Like the Swiss Army Knife, the popular AR-15 rifle is a perfect combination of home defense weapon and homeland defense equipment. Good for both home and battle, the AR-15 is the kind of versatile gun that lies at the intersection of the kinds of firearms protected under District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) and United States v Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939)

 

 

How much you wanna bet the judge has at least one of them? :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Like the Swiss Army Knife, the popular AR-15 rifle is a perfect combination of home defense weapon and homeland defense equipment. Good for both home and battle, the AR-15 is the kind of versatile gun that lies at the intersection of the kinds of firearms protected under District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) and United States v Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939)

 

 

How much you wanna bet the judge has at least one of them? :)

 

One of each!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Like the Swiss Army Knife, the popular AR-15 rifle is a perfect combination of home defense weapon and homeland defense equipment. Good for both home and battle, the AR-15 is the kind of versatile gun that lies at the intersection of the kinds of firearms protected under District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) and United States v Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939)

 

 

How much you wanna bet the judge has at least one of them? :)

 

Firearm intersectionality :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

They didn't hear the case, they heard a motion to stay the district court's order while the appeal was pending. As a result the 9th Circuit put this new case on hold while they decide a very similar case that has already been briefed. As I expect, once the 9th Circuit rules in the older case that the ban is ok, they will remand this new case to the district court telling that court to now take into account the expected decision in the older case. In total, they can then defer dealing with this new Benitez decision for a couple of years at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's amazing to me that the Bill of Rights is supposed to be beyond reproach and shall not EVER be infringed. However, when politicians clearly design legislation to breach those rights, the entire judicial system plays this game to allow this infringement to exist for months, years, and in some cases decades, until it's convenient to address and it "works" through the system.

 

That a bunch of BS in my mind. The state of Illinois and a few others has crafted an art of gaming the system and playing the cat and mouse game, specifically trying to push the boundaries, and going past, and figuring they will at least have their time in the sun for the duration. This should never be possible.

 

Imho, those who infringe on core individual rights, and those that allow the continuation, should be PERSONALLY responsible and liable for the contributing act for trampling these very important rights. This is F'd up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...