Sneaky Pete ?

[mikeyk101]

For kicks, a couple days ago, I did the same thing. First email next day was for 10% off. The next day was 20% off. I was holding out for the third day which was today to see if I too got the 35% offer. Mine was for 25% off and I only have 8 hours to take advantage. I think I will wait one more day and see what happens. If I get a 35% offer, I might take advantage of it. If not, no big deal because I could do without it anyway...

[ultra magnus]

Not a good choice. They look enormous, even for smaller guns. Anyone paying attention will notice you taking or placing your phone in and out of your pocket, while still having a huge honking "phone" case on your belt. Why not pocket carry? It conceals better, and can come into action as fast or faster than gimmick holsters.

[Bitter Clinger]

Have you tried an OWB holster?

 

I've tried an IWB and not only is it uncomfortable, I'd really need to buy all new pants a couple inches bigger to properly fit it.

 

I've been using an OWB holster for years with no issues and it's very comfortable. You sometimes don't even know the gun is there.

[oohrah]

Not a good choice. They look enormous, even for smaller guns. Anyone paying attention will notice you taking or placing your phone in and out of your pocket, while still having a huge honking "phone" case on your belt. Why not pocket carry? It conceals better, and can come into action as fast or faster than gimmick holsters.

Actually, nobody notices. Even when I open carry hardly anybody notices. OK sure, there may be a few curious, but it's usually other CCLers noticing a bulge. Most folks are too absorbed to even think about it. Just my 2c.

[Bubbacs]

So you’ll probably get the oh well e-mail “we tried”

Then they go on to explain that they have other items of interest!

 

Eye glass case

Phone case

Mags armor cases

 

Spend $50 and get a free armor cover for your mag

Spend$100 and get free shipping

 

I’m over the Sneaky Pete for now, maybe I’ll discover one out in the wild to actually see it. Until then, thanks for the reply’s fellas.

[Retiredguns]

Maybe in 1996 when people had big 'ol PDAs, but now it would be seriously conspicuous. I looked at them about 6 years a go, but decided against. I did get some weird pouch when I bought a Taurus TCP and wore it once to a restaurant. It just felt weird. I too carry OWB with an un-tucked shirt when possible. Nice and comfy.

[SycamoreRuger]

Would a Sneaky Pete qualify as a so-called "container" so a legal gun owner could carry an unloaded gun in an otherwise restricted area (sometimes referred to "FOID carry")?

[THE KING]

Would a Sneaky Pete qualify as a so-called "container" so a legal gun owner could carry transport an unloaded gun in an otherwise restricted area (sometimes referred to "FOID carry")?

In my opinion and some may have a different view. By looking at the sneaky pete, it appears it would meet the definition of a container, therefore a person with a FOID should be able to "transport" an unloaded firearm without violation of

720 ILCS 5/24-1 (a)(4) (i, ii, iii).

 

I changed your post because FOID carry is completely different than transport. A person can "carry" a firearm in accordance with

720 ILCS 5/24-1 (a)(4) and is not required to have an FCCL.

 

KING

[oohrah]

I thought a transport carrier had to be locked? SPs don't lock.

[THE KING]

I thought a transport carrier had to be locked? SPs don't lock.

No, there's no requirement for any case or container to be locked.

[Bubbacs]

Humm

Then why is it that we have to lock our cars if we leave a handgun inside.

Used to be a case locked, but I believe it was changed when they said the glove box would suffice IF the car was locked.

 

IANAL

[THE KING]

Humm

Then why is it that we have to lock our cars if we leave a handgun inside.

Used to be a case locked, but I believe it was changed when they said the glove box would suffice IF the car was locked.

IANAL

Transportation of a firearm for a FOID holder falls under the UUW statute. 720 ILCS 5/24-1

 

The storage of a firearm in your vehicle falls under the FCCA. 430 ILCS 66.

 

Two different statutes for two different scenarios, that's why.