Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Based on today's ISRA weekly bulletin, the prosecution has dropped the case against Brown.

The rest of us have to follow the same rules as ever.

I think this topic can be unpinned.
  • Molly B. changed the title to People v. Brown - FOID unconstituional IL District Court ruling overruled in higher court
  • Molly B. unpinned this topic
Posted
On 3/6/2026 at 4:34 PM, John Q Public said:

It's what they do, if they are going to lose, they limit it to one person, and round we go. 

And there is not way that is legal! The state can violate everyones rights but one person????????

Posted

So, did the state automatically give her a FOID Card?

Posted
Brown has always been eligible for a FOID, but for whatever reasons she never applied for one. The state (i.e., White County ASA Chris Neal) has simply chosen to stop trying to prosecute her for not having one.
Posted
On 3/6/2026 at 6:23 PM, ragsbo said:

And there is not way that is legal! The state can violate everyones rights but one person????????

 

 

¿Do you think that her rights were not violated?

Posted
On March 6, 2026 at 11:08 PM CST, mikew said:
¿Do you think that her rights were not violated?

That probably depends on whether she got to keep the rifle. She certainly got a lot of due process.
Posted
On 3/6/2026 at 11:44 PM, Euler said:


That probably depends on whether she got to keep the rifle. She certainly got a lot of due process.

All of that due process was an Infringement !

Posted
On 3/6/2026 at 11:44 PM, Euler said:


That probably depends on whether she got to keep the rifle. She certainly got a lot of due process.

 

She got put through the legal system for something that would get you hardly noticed in other states, 
or an "attagirl."

This thing dragged out for 9  years or so. for a constitutionally protected activity.
 

Meanwhile, in this 9 years, was she under felony indictment?
Could she have even made the decision to get a FOID?

 

 

 

Posted (edited)
On 3/8/2026 at 10:27 AM, Tvandermyde said:

I think the new tactic should ask the Court for a writ of replevin for the rifle. And see if the sheriff fights it since she doesn't have a FOID card

Maybe a better move would be to chip away at FOID. 

Example, attack FOID requirement for possession “in the home”, firearm, ammo, and accoutrements. 
I think there is some in LITH that recently got a personal SWAT demonstration over some ammo. Don’t know if there was anything else involved. 

Edited by mab22

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...