gangrel Posted April 14, 2016 at 09:12 PM Posted April 14, 2016 at 09:12 PM An applicant for a new license shall provide proof of certification by a certified instructor that the applicant passed a live fire exercise with a concealable firearm consisting of: a minimum of 30 rounds; and 10 rounds from a distance of 5 yards; 10 rounds from a distance of 7 yards; 10 rounds from a distance of 10 yards at a B-27 silhouette target approved by the Department. A certificate of completion for an applicant's firearm training course shall not be issued to a student who: during the range firing portion of testing fails to hit the target with 70% of the rounds fired. Ok, so on the paper it is. Forget about the silhouette. Pardon the sarcasm. I do fall into the camp that says the state shouldn't be mandating the training in the first place, but considering we are all thinking, law-abiding citizens who want to do right by what we say we are going to do, the silhouette makes sense. The scoring rings could likewise be viewed as "the target". The law does in fact state the qualification above, but it also states that the department shall approve the curriculum. Right or wrong, they set those standards. Then they corrected them, but never communicated the correction. Now, over a year later, they have finally gotten around to communicating the correction. I for one am breathing a sigh of relief for finally having it in black and white from ISP, all frustration aside...
spec5 Posted April 14, 2016 at 10:54 PM Posted April 14, 2016 at 10:54 PM InAfter IN what is next? B27 as B4 isn't going to happen.
Bubbacs Posted April 14, 2016 at 11:06 PM Posted April 14, 2016 at 11:06 PM InAfter IN what is next? B27 as B4 isn't going to happen. I see what you did there..........I'll play The
spec5 Posted April 14, 2016 at 11:20 PM Posted April 14, 2016 at 11:20 PM InAfter IN what is next? B27 as B4 isn't going to happen. I see what you did there..........I'll playTheNO NO NO? Don't play games with Molly B's thread as bad things could happen to you. I am not playing anymore.
Bubbacs Posted April 15, 2016 at 12:53 AM Posted April 15, 2016 at 12:53 AM WaitYou sucker me IN ?Only to not tell me B4......And now MollyB will be giving me THE heave ho. Thanks, I'll be LOCKED out for months!
spec5 Posted April 15, 2016 at 01:19 AM Posted April 15, 2016 at 01:19 AM WaitYou sucker me IN ?Only to not tell me B4......And now MollyB will be giving me THE heave ho.Thanks, I'll be LOCKED out for months!Maybe she won't get you just your silhouette.
C0untZer0 Posted April 15, 2016 at 01:20 AM Posted April 15, 2016 at 01:20 AM The scoring rings could likewise be viewed as "the target". The black area outside of the 7-ring is assigned a score value, hits outside of the 7-ring but in the black are 3 points. If the instructor is using an official NRA B-27 target, the scoring legend should be on the target.
C0untZer0 Posted April 15, 2016 at 01:27 AM Posted April 15, 2016 at 01:27 AM Traditionally or most commonly, areas assigned a scoring value are considered "the target" while hits on areas that have no assigned value are considered "paper". So I'm not sure how this idea got started that the 7 ring and inward is "The Target", I can only assume it was started by someone in the ISP who didn't understand the B-27 target and hadn't competed in matches where the B-27 target was used according to NRA rules. That aside, a little knowledge of anatomy tells you there are areas on the B-27 target that still represent critical areas such as the head and the kidneys. Anyway, I'm glad its over...
jumperj Posted April 15, 2016 at 04:12 AM Posted April 15, 2016 at 04:12 AM So the first four times I failed the shooting portion of my test, I actually passed?
sirflyguy Posted April 15, 2016 at 12:25 PM Posted April 15, 2016 at 12:25 PM I have only had a couple of folks who would have failed the qualification with the ISP's "inside the ring" interpretation. Having said that, I still feel they overreached with their declaration. I am glad it has been reversed.
RoyB Posted April 16, 2016 at 01:20 PM Posted April 16, 2016 at 01:20 PM It's nice they finally clarified the requirements. With that being said, I think even hitting the rings is a bit easy for the test. If you can't hit 70% within the rings at 5-10 yards, you probably shouldn't be carrying or get some range practice. What's going to happen in a panic situation? There was a person in our class that carried a gun for their line of work (not a PO). They were lucky to get any of them within the 7 ring. I was a bit shocked. I do realize most times you will not be firing at 10 yards, but god forbid you need to unload 2 magazines, I can't believe hitting 9 potential bystanders is acceptable to pass the test.
jumperj Posted April 16, 2016 at 03:00 PM Posted April 16, 2016 at 03:00 PM It was a bit scary to think some of the people in my class were given a permit. One older woman had a 22lr revolver. Her first shot went off pointed at the sky. She managed to just get enough shots on paper to pass. And that's with a long barrel 22. Another guy who had prior military, WWII maybe? This man had a pistol as old as him. It fell apart when he tried to put the magazine in. He also passed.... Maybe with practice they'll get better
Joebillybob Posted April 16, 2016 at 05:08 PM Posted April 16, 2016 at 05:08 PM i thought mollythreads were LOCK RESISTENT... so Innski Before Thy Nonlockski....
mqqn Posted April 16, 2016 at 06:44 PM Posted April 16, 2016 at 06:44 PM Thank you very much for the update, Molly! best mqqn
sirflyguy Posted April 16, 2016 at 07:43 PM Posted April 16, 2016 at 07:43 PM It was a bit scary to think some of the people in my class were given a permit. One older woman had a 22lr revolver. Her first shot went off pointed at the sky. She managed to just get enough shots on paper to pass. And that's with a long barrel 22. Another guy who had prior military, WWII maybe? This man had a pistol as old as him. It fell apart when he tried to put the magazine in. He also passed.... Maybe with practice they'll get betterI prefer to call it a license. I do not believe there are any statistical increases of gun accidents in states with less or no training requirements. I do understand what you are saying (especially as a pistol instructor myself), but I am opposed to forced training. I am all for as much training as a person wants to do of their own free will. That is just me.
C0untZer0 Posted April 16, 2016 at 09:36 PM Posted April 16, 2016 at 09:36 PM It was a bit scary to think some of the people in my class were given a permit. Its scary to think of the people they let procreate - but hey, whaddya ya gonna do?
jumperj Posted April 16, 2016 at 10:15 PM Posted April 16, 2016 at 10:15 PM It was a bit scary to think some of the people in my class were given a permit. One older woman had a 22lr revolver. Her first shot went off pointed at the sky. She managed to just get enough shots on paper to pass. And that's with a long barrel 22. Another guy who had prior military, WWII maybe? This man had a pistol as old as him. It fell apart when he tried to put the magazine in. He also passed.... Maybe with practice they'll get betterI prefer to call it a license. I do not believe there are any statistical increases of gun accidents in states with less or no training requirements. I do understand what you are saying (especially as a pistol instructor myself), but I am opposed to forced training. I am all for as much training as a person wants to do of their own free will. That is just me. I wouldn't want to make it mandatory to get training first..This is still a free country (comparatively speaking) Just wish people would..
gangrel Posted April 16, 2016 at 11:34 PM Posted April 16, 2016 at 11:34 PM It was a bit scary to think some of the people in my class were given a permit. One older woman had a 22lr revolver. Her first shot went off pointed at the sky. She managed to just get enough shots on paper to pass. And that's with a long barrel 22. Another guy who had prior military, WWII maybe? This man had a pistol as old as him. It fell apart when he tried to put the magazine in. He also passed.... Maybe with practice they'll get better I agree with my fellow instructors that training should be voluntary, not mandated by law. That being said, unsafe firearm handling is one of conditions which by law we are required to fail a student. The lady who skyed her first round should have been failed on the spot. Of course it is very likely that happened because proper training was not provided in the classroom prior to going out on the range. Lots of things going wrong in this story, but insufficient training requirements is NOT one of them. Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.