Jump to content

Op-Ed on Concealed Carry in Chicago Sun Times


chip

Recommended Posts

Posted
Excellent job! Facts, well stated, totally reasonable, and impossible to refute. Thanks for taking the time.
Posted

Well said and well done Chip!

 

I saw an article the other day that listed the largest number of CCL permits by zip code. My old neighborhood 60617, has the highest number of permits in Chicago with 538 permits. This zip code also had large number of former CHA residences move in after the developments on State St. were knocked down. I am happy to see people stepping up to the plate and taking responsibility for protecting themselves.

 

its sad when people alow themselves to be confused with anti-gun propaganda to the point where they cannot seperate in their minds the difference between having a gun for self protection, and having a gun for the purpose of threatening, harrassing and intimedating people. To some people "all guns are bad". I say, "let the Sheeple, be Sheeple". They benefit from you carrying, whether they know it or not! You clearly understand the issues, let them waller in confusion. If you ever find yourself in an active killer situation, always remember that your responsibility is to get you, and your party out safely. While I feel sorry for the other people in the situation, they had the opportunity to invest in themselves the time and resources to take the class, arm themselves, and get a permit, just like you did. if they chose not to (what we call "victim by choice"), thats on them. City police departments get paid to handle those types of situations, you are only responsible for you and yours.

Posted

I guess I'm cynical but I doubt that this well written and logical column will change the mind of any anti. I can well imagine comments such as "if everyone carried as you do we will have blood in the streets, wild west shootouts and kids killed by accidental shootings". Anti's will say "carrying a gun is not the answer; we should ban guns so that even the gangs will not have guns" and other nonsense to justify their emotional fear and dislike of firearms. Carrying a gun is sign of a person accepting personal responsibility for their safety and the safety of their loved ones. Citizens of big cities who keep electing anti-gun Democrats believe it is the government's role to protect and provide for them, and the knowledge of individuals who take responsibility for their own defense both confuse and embarrass those who want the police to protect them because at some deep level they know that we are right and they are wrong.

Posted

Just ask any of your favorite Anti 2A friends if they have ever entered the state of Indiana?

 

How much blood was pouring down the drains as you crossed the street?

 

When they look at you as if you lost your mind just remind them that Indiana has been dispensing CCW cards for a $25.00 fee with NO special training required for OVER 50 years and 0 OK CORALS have occurred so far.

Posted

That was a very well-done letter.

 

While some might say you're peeing into a hurricane in getting it published, I say it's worthwhile and I'll tell you why: It chips away at the mental wall some people have about guns.

 

No single letter or discussion (argument?) short of a life-changing personal experience, will change a person's views on gun ownership in a single instance.

 

But by influencing them subtly, you're contributing to a change of beliefs.

 

Only after people convince themselves that there is a better way (or admit they have been wrong before), only then will they be truly pro-gun.

 

Sometimes that takes many years.

 

You did well, sir.

Posted

I guess I'm cynical but I doubt that this well written and logical column will change the mind of any anti. I can well imagine comments such as "if everyone carried as you do we will have blood in the streets, wild west shootouts and kids killed by accidental shootings". Anti's will say "carrying a gun is not the answer; we should ban guns so that even the gangs will not have guns" and other nonsense to justify their emotional fear and dislike of firearms. Carrying a gun is sign of a person accepting personal responsibility for their safety and the safety of their loved ones. Citizens of big cities who keep electing anti-gun Democrats believe it is the government's role to protect and provide for them, and the knowledge of individuals who take responsibility for their own defense both confuse and embarrass those who want the police to protect them because at some deep level they know that we are right and they are wrong. Its

Its not intended to change the mind of an anti just like nothing from the antis is intended to change our minds. Its all about the middle of the road folks, whose only knowledge of firearms and gun control comes from Op-Eds like this

Posted

 

I guess I'm cynical but I doubt that this well written and logical column will change the mind of any anti. I can well imagine comments such as "if everyone carried as you do we will have blood in the streets, wild west shootouts and kids killed by accidental shootings". Anti's will say "carrying a gun is not the answer; we should ban guns so that even the gangs will not have guns" and other nonsense to justify their emotional fear and dislike of firearms. Carrying a gun is sign of a person accepting personal responsibility for their safety and the safety of their loved ones. Citizens of big cities who keep electing anti-gun Democrats believe it is the government's role to protect and provide for them, and the knowledge of individuals who take responsibility for their own defense both confuse and embarrass those who want the police to protect them because at some deep level they know that we are right and they are wrong. Its

Its not intended to change the mind of an anti just like nothing from the antis is intended to change our minds. Its all about the middle of the road folks, whose only knowledge of firearms and gun control comes from Op-Eds like this

 

Love the eidtorial titled "treading water on Illinois gun culture isn't good enough they published... all about "peaceful coexistence" and "social contract", yet implying that law abiding citizens are the ones to blame for Blood D Hoodrat offing Chuckie Crips.

 

Supporters of concealed-carry laws essentially believe in an armed nation, but we can’t agree. A peaceful society is built on a strong social contract, not on a fear of getting shot.

As I've posted elsewhere - Once a human has shown behavior that indicates enough of a threat of death or great bodily harm to another the time for discussion and identification is over, as they have shown a willingness to abandon the Rousseauian social contract that allows us to interact politely and we have now jumped into Hobbes’ natural existence.

 

At that point all I want is the most amount of STOPITRIGHTTHEHECKNOW to the bad guy for the buck, as well as any buddies he brought with him.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...