Jump to content

Call to Action 2/12/2015 - Witness Slips Needed


mauserme

Recommended Posts

Posted

.

Call to Action

Witness Slips Needed

Witness Slip Instructions

 

 

 

In our first Call to Action of the 99th General Assembly, we ask our members to voice their opposition to two bills scheduled to be heard in the House Judiciary - Criminal Committee 2/18/2015. To those who have already participated in filing witness slips, these bills will be familiar. We have opposed the intent behind both in prior General Assemblies and continue our opposition for many of the same reasons.

 

Instructions for completing witness slips can be found here.

 

Please take a moment to make your feelings known on the following bills today.

 

 

 

 

Log on to the ILGA Dashboard or Create a New Account

 

 

 

 

HB148 Lost & Stolen Firearms - OPPONENT

 

 

Illinois law has required FOID Card holders, but not persons illegally in possession of firearms, to report lost or stolen firearms since the Gun Safety and Responsibility Act became law effective 8/9/2013. HB148 seeks to deny otherwise law abiding citizens their right to own firearms via FOID revocation and felony conviction.

 

 

 

 

HB265 Firearm Protect Order - OPPONENT

 

 

There are many forms of protection order available to the courts in Illinois, from granting occupancy of the family home to giving custody of the family pet to one spouse or another. Of the tools available to a judge a firearm protection order, as it currently exists in law, is one of the most important when determined necessary by a court of competent jurisdiction.

 

HB265 proposes to subvert the judicial discretion so necessary to our system of governance by prohibiting the subject of an order of protection from purchasing or transporting a firearm, even when that order is simply in regard to animals, property, and a number of other orders unrelated to a physical threat against the petitioner.

 

While enough to oppose on its own merits, HB265 also creates a frightening potential synergy when taken in context with HB399 Protection Order Issuance. Though not the subject of the current call to action HB399 proposes to empower the States Attorney, and courts on their own motion, to impose an order of protection on behalf of a petitioner even against the petitioner's wishes. This combination of ill conceived legislation, both bad in their own right, establishes an untenable system of potential rights denial under the most unusual of circumstances.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited to add a reminder that we ask our members to indicate they represent only themselves when completing witness slips. Our feeling is that your voice as an individual resident of the state is much stronger than as an unofficial representative of a group.

Posted

Done x2

Posted

Done for both of them.

 

I assume that "Record of Appearance Only" is the standard response, but what if someone does want to write something in support (or opposition) of a bill. What's the benefit or detriment to that, assuming that it's a well-reasoned and supported position? For that matter, what should be included in a written statement for a Witness Statement to make it have whatever possible validity and weight over just the Record of Appearance witness statement?

 

I'd really like to know this, because I happen to have written for a living, and persuasive communication is right in my wheelhouse. I've had some excellent success in dealing with Federal agencies and legislators over the years, getting them to see things my way, so if I can put that to use here, I'd be glad to.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...