-
Posts
18,586 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by Molly B.
-
-
Are you talking about the address history for ccl?
-
Fantastic!
-
Thanks for the update!
-
This is WARP speed compared to the usual timelines.
-
Quote
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT
2024 IL App (3d) 210073
Opinion filed March 1, 2024The trial court found that there was no genuine issue of
material fact regarding the constitutionality of the statutory scheme and granted defendants’
motion for summary judgment. Applying the text-and-history test recently advanced in New York
State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen, 597 U.S. ___, ___, 142 S. Ct. 2111, 2120 (2022), we conclude
that the public carry restrictions imposed under the UUW and the AUUW do not violate the second
amendment and affirm. -
169
Feb 29, 2024
Order from Judge McGlynn
. Parties shall submit their initial disclosures and written discovery requests with the Court carbon copied no later than March 13, 2024. Parties shall submit the identities of their affirmative experts and their subject matter expertise with the Court carbon copied no later than March 27, 2024, understanding that supplemental expert identification may be necessary. Parties shall respond to requests for written discovery with the Court carbon copied no later than April 3, 2024. Order to issue setting a status conference to discuss the status of discovery in mid-April. -
-
-
https://www.thecentersquare.com/illinois/article_c65d712e-d670-11ee-9658-d351d172d757.html
Federal judge lays out roadmap for how challenge to Illinois’ gun ban proceeds
Barnett v Raoul - scheduling and discovery conf Feb 28, 2024.pdf
-
In the renewal, try changing her name and adding her previous name to the " formerly known as" list
-
However, unlike handguns, short-barreled firearms are not “an entire class of
‘arms’ *** chosen by American society for [the] lawful purpose” of self-defense. See Heller 554
U.S. at 625, 628. Short-barreled firearms are regulated precisely because they are “concealable
weapon *** likely to be used for criminal purposes.” See United States v. Thompson/Center
Arms Co., 504 U.S. 505, 517 (1992) (explaining that short-barreled rifles are regulated under the
National Firearms Act (26 U.S.C. §§ 5841, 5845 (2018)) for this very reason). The sheer number
of registered short-barreled firearms does not undercut their dangerousness or the fact that they
are “not typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes.”4 See Heller, 554 U.S.
at 625, 628; see also People v. Dean, 207 Ill. App. 3d 640, 642 (1990) (noting that the UUW
statute “provides that a person in possession of a sawed-off shotgun *** has committed a crime.
No exceptions are allowed under this section because such weapons are considered to be
inherently dangerous to human life”). -
On 2/9/2024 at 10:17 PM, Euler said:
On February 9, the judge scheduled another status hearing for February 28.
Thank you for keeping us updated!!
-
Has a date been set for the next status hearing? Or whatever happens next?
-
Bost joined Adam Kinzinger in urging the ATF to ban a firearm accessory by rule rather than by law - listen closely, he urged a government agency to infringe on the Second Amendment because the House did not have the votes to do it.
He supports universal background checks.
Those are my issues. -
Nice to see another judge follow the u.s. Supreme Court directives in Heller and NYSRPA.
-
Isp.instructor.docs@illinois.gov
-
Private message sent
-
-
I think this went well. Thanks for posting, Todd.
-
-
On 1/16/2024 at 7:37 PM, mauserme said:
Following House and Senate sessions made very short yesterday by the urgency of adopting PICA rules more than 2 weeks after the registration "deadline", JCAR did adopt those rules and the "deadline" is now retroactively an actual deadline. Well, sort of a deadline. The registration portal remains open so it depends on what "deadline" means and who you ask.
"However, the Republican JCAR members were successful in filing a motion to object to the rules on the same grounds. ISP must respond in writing to the Committee’s objection before it can file the regulations with the Secretary of State’s Office to be adopted." Senator Dale Fowler
-
We know from history what our founding fathers did and it wasn't until the British came for the colonist stored ammunition. This is not likely to happen in this day and age and with the U.S. Supreme Court NYSRPA v Bruen ruling. Let us pray it does not.
-
Donation received and email sent requesting mailing address. Thank you for the kind words!
-
And so we begin a new year. Onward and upward! Thank you for a great job mauser!
US v Carbajal-Flores - Undocumented immigrant in possession
in Judicial Second Amendment Case Discussion
Posted