davel501

This has the making of a really good lawsuit. The state took a person's rights and property on false pretenses and now refuses to return the constitutionally protected property.

Get yourself one of these: https://www.midwayusa.com/product/1015085981?pid=772064, set an aggressive par time, watch your body move like a blob of jello that has escaped its bowl. You get better quickly but for the first little bit you've got to choose between speed and hitting the target.

*request an extension

Honestly, your version makes it a better story for our side. Arbitrary and capricious enforcement. ✅

In the video they show the guidance that was provided. ISP told them they shouldn't be arresting people in these situations.

Probably to make it racist. It doesn't look good for cpd. These would make very good cases to challenge the foid based on the facts in the story.

That law seems like such a low bar. The legislature could repeal it as part of the bill passing it again. I'm guessing a state court would strike it on first amendment grounds too.

I mean, he's an attorney and he's a general. I'll bet he knows all about all the laws and has some sick ninja skills too.

They tried. I saw a bit of it on fb after the shooting but nobody was having it.

It sure would test SCOTUS' refusal to get involved in an interlocutory appeal.

Close but no cigar.

I wish they'd get to "anything I want as long as it's not breaking any constitutional laws".

It just dawned on me, Easterbrook wants to send the case back down for further development of the record.

Got to say, from what I heard today, I've never been so happy to be so wrong.

Todd has been saying they took care to build a large body of work behind this one. I would expect scotus to be able to grab everything they like while admonishing the 7th.

Wow. That takedown felt like justice.

"This court got it wrong"

Fingers crossed, it goes so well that they have to send someone out for large quantities of brown liquor.

I pray tomorrow brings us great freedom and joy and them great consternation.

"They’re telling this story about Lord Beaverbrook and a famous actress. In a game of hypothetical questions, Beaverbrook asked the lady, “Would you live with a stranger if he paid you a million pounds?” “Yes,” she answered. “And if he paid you five pounds?” The irate lady fumed, “What do you think I am?” “We’ve already established that,” returned Beaverbrook. “Now we’re trying to determine the degree.” —The U. of California Pelican"

I wish people would stop commenting on this thread. Every time I see the thread title in the unread posts I get angry.

I mean, you ever count the fat dudes at Walmart that think they're operators?