colt-45

I think it's been said before that they are not taking ANY 2nd amendment cases this year at all.

Well so much for a ruling this year on the 2nd amendment.

so what is the good side of these cases?

So there as not been a ruling yet?

So we lost this one going toSCOTUS to than?

i to just received my order today. thanks cjurczak they look grate, so glad i ordered them from you. i hope i never have to pass them out, but hey this is Illinois, right. thanks again.

that city thinks they still live in the 1950s.

i dont put nothing past these people

did we win

You're in--thanks. 54th John O. Jones 107th John Cavaletto

On 9/30, instead of a plan for the PI, they OBJECTED to the PI. So, their separate proposed injunction order is to have no injunction, in other words. They seem to be making a habit of thumbing their collective nose at the court. Good way to piss off a federal judge. i guess this state thinks there above the law or at least the federal judges.

Any weapons that employs an explosive upon the target and probably can kill or injure people in close proximity when the target is struck is certainly ripe for proper limitations and safeguards. Of course im joking about a bazooka, but that one line should throw out Cook county's assault weapon ban. How did we loose heller 2 i didn't even know there was a heller2, what was that case about?

O. that is a good ? a guy asked me that one day last week. i said yea they could. but he needed to talk to the nra first.

+1