ming

Thanks to the OP and others for this thread. I recently renewed my NRA credentials and emailed a scan to the ISP. Just received confirmation that they updated my profile. Took 9 days from when I sent them, so not too shabby.

but then they couldn't collect the renewal fee.

Not just you. I get a warning do not hotlink. I use Comcast. I'm using firefox Just worked for me on Firefox. No warning. Used this link: http://www.handgunlaw.us/

You must be the first. Congrats.

Welcome aboard mandoguy. I don't have the answer, but someone here will.

That's my question as well. Will the IC curriculum get it's own number that all of us who follow this curriculum can use?

Some discussion at TTAG: http://www.thetrutha...me/#more-256063 and more at Volokh: http://www.volokh.com/category/guns/

I sent in a check for the CLIC package but didn't think to order the certificates. Can we do this at any time and in the same manner, i.e., check or PayPal?

Jump right in Karl. The water's especially nice today!

More wait: MINUTE entry before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall:Status hearing held on 10/26/2011. Fact Discovery ordered closed by 4/20/2012. Dispositive motions with supporting memoranda due by 7/13/2012. Responses due by 8/10/2012. Replies due by 8/24/2012. Ruling will be made by mail. Status hearing set for 4/23/2012 at 09:00 AM. to inform the Court if the parties would like to engage in settlement negotiations. Defendant's oral motion to answer the complaint by 11/16/2011 is granted. The Court denies the entry of a preliminary injunction by the plaintiff.Advised in open court notice (tsa, ) (Entered: 10/26/2011)

Can the decision not to moot be appealed? If so, when does the process terminate?

I think it's likely that the City will ask for en banc review ... I don't think they will but who knows. If asking for en banc review was being considered should the decision go against the city, I don't think they would have hurried to get in the new ordinance allowing ranges. In fact, passing the new ordinance could possibly now weaken their case. Part of their argument was that ranges were dangerous. Now they've in effect conceded that maybe they may not be quite as dangerous as we said earlier. If they were smart they would go back and bring the new ordinance into accordance with the recent decision and avoid future litigation. Of course the catch here may be the "if they were smart" part.

The court's decision is a nice read. Chicago gets a well deserved spanking. May there be many more!

All isn't lost ming. I've been calling Madigan's offices for about 5 years and they actually talk to me now. Sometimes it just takes a little while to get the point across Lang has actually answered several of my emails. However, he stopped when I asked him to become a cosponsor on HB0148.

8th Senate (Silverstein) 16th House (Lang)