I would be overjoyed if this worked, and I'd start working on Macoupin County board members right away if someone could convince me that I'm not wasting their time, but I have to be the devil's advocate here.
Quote
Here is my question: Is there an Illinois law that specifically forbids concealed carry permits?
There's no law that forbids the permits, but the UUW statute specifically forbids carrying firearms. Then it sets out legal exemptions, such as unloaded, uncased carry with a FOID card. A person carrying a loaded gun with a permit from his county doesn't meet the exceptions. The permit itself is irrelevant as far as the state law goes.
My point is that I don't see how a county ordinance will invalidate the state's law, even within the county's borders.
Someone brought up the point that Chicago "superseded" state law, so this should be OK, too. I don't believe that's how it works. The Chicago law is more restrictive at the local level, not less. A good example of this principle at work is the drug legalization movement. In California and some other places, marijuana is legal under the right circumstances, under state law. But it's still illegal under federal law, and the feds will get you for using it. At the same time, there's nothing keeping local cops from arresting you under the federal statute if the winds change or you get that one guy.
So, Winnebago County issues you a permit. Presumably that means nobody working for the Sheriff's office will arrest you for UUW. But why would the Rockford police or the State Police not arrest you under the UUW statute, and why would that arrest not hold up in court?
Again, it's not that I don't want this to work. I'm ready to be convinced that it could possibly work. Can anyone actually answer this one question:
"If a given act is illegal under Illinois law, but not illegal under county law, in a home-rule county, can a resident of the county be arrested and prosecuted under the Illinois law?"
I believe he can, but I'm not a lawyer.