sctman800 Posted February 19, 2008 at 06:48 PM Posted February 19, 2008 at 06:48 PM We have a poll at news-gazette.com in Champaign- Urbana, should Illinois have CCW. Near the bottom of the page. 62% yes36% no at least when I voted. Jim.
oneshot Posted February 19, 2008 at 06:57 PM Posted February 19, 2008 at 06:57 PM There's another thread on this, we were behind a little before, we've pulled ahead but it seems there are some anti's who've taken note; they're not going to let us run away with it.
GWBH Posted February 19, 2008 at 07:07 PM Posted February 19, 2008 at 07:07 PM Here's what the results were when I voted. Yes 39% No 60% Don't know 1%
SheepleNoMore Posted February 19, 2008 at 07:49 PM Posted February 19, 2008 at 07:49 PM Uhmmm?!?!?!?!????? Two hundred votes in two minutes. Results are: Yes 25%No 70% with 4782 voting. That is about 5 times the number of responses for the other recent polls. Me thinks mischief is afoot. SNM
Slappy Posted February 19, 2008 at 08:05 PM Posted February 19, 2008 at 08:05 PM Uhmmm?!?!?!?!????? Two hundred votes in two minutes. Results are: Yes 25%No 70% with 4782 voting. That is about 5 times the number of responses for the other recent polls. Me thinks mischief is afoot. SNM yeah something definitely isnt right...
lockman Posted February 19, 2008 at 10:28 PM Posted February 19, 2008 at 10:28 PM Uhmmm?!?!?!?!????? Two hundred votes in two minutes. Results are: Yes 25%No 70% with 4782 voting. That is about 5 times the number of responses for the other recent polls. Me thinks mischief is afoot. SNM yeah something definitely isnt right... Look at the vote totals: over 5 times the highest of any poll -- someone has an application that is defeating the system. I guess the only valid poll will be the one that has a validation code. You can vote more than once but you will have to take all afternoon to vote a few hunded times.
abolt243 Posted February 19, 2008 at 10:32 PM Posted February 19, 2008 at 10:32 PM Uhmmm?!?!?!?!????? Two hundred votes in two minutes. Results are: Yes 25%No 70% with 4782 voting. That is about 5 times the number of responses for the other recent polls. Me thinks mischief is afoot. SNM yeah something definitely isnt right... Look at the vote totals: over 5 times the highest of any poll -- someone has an application that is defeating the system. I guess the only valid poll will be the one that has a validation code. You can vote more than once but you will have to take all afternoon to vote a few hunded times. Votebots have rendered the online polls useless. I'm not going to even try anymore! AB
Oldcop Posted February 20, 2008 at 04:54 AM Posted February 20, 2008 at 04:54 AM Uhmmm?!?!?!?!????? Two hundred votes in two minutes. Results are: Yes 25%No 70% with 4782 voting. That is about 5 times the number of responses for the other recent polls. Me thinks mischief is afoot. SNM yeah something definitely isnt right... Look at the vote totals: over 5 times the highest of any poll -- someone has an application that is defeating the system. I guess the only valid poll will be the one that has a validation code. You can vote more than once but you will have to take all afternoon to vote a few hunded times. Votebots have rendered the online polls useless. I'm not going to even try anymore! AB I think your right in assuming the online polls are not much use. I was on Senator Dan Rutherfords sight and we were loosing there too. The only way we are going to get concealed carry in Illinois is to get the women involved. They have more clout than we give them credit for. Talk your ladies into raising cane about it like Valinda Rowe does and we will get somewhere. Hope to see you all in Springfield.
abolt243 Posted February 20, 2008 at 11:35 AM Posted February 20, 2008 at 11:35 AM Uhmmm?!?!?!?!????? Two hundred votes in two minutes. Results are: Yes 25%No 70% with 4782 voting. That is about 5 times the number of responses for the other recent polls. Me thinks mischief is afoot. SNM yeah something definitely isnt right... Look at the vote totals: over 5 times the highest of any poll -- someone has an application that is defeating the system. I guess the only valid poll will be the one that has a validation code. You can vote more than once but you will have to take all afternoon to vote a few hunded times. Votebots have rendered the online polls useless. I'm not going to even try anymore! AB I think your right in assuming the online polls are not much use. I was on Senator Dan Rutherfords sight and we were loosing there too. The only way we are going to get concealed carry in Illinois is to get the women involved. They have more clout than we give them credit for. Talk your ladies into raising cane about it like Valinda Rowe does and we will get somewhere. Hope to see you all in Springfield. I wonder if antis trolling this site use it to find these polls and unleash the bots?? You're right about tha ladies. AB
Rem870 Posted February 20, 2008 at 01:34 PM Posted February 20, 2008 at 01:34 PM Uhmmm?!?!?!?!????? Two hundred votes in two minutes. Results are: Yes 25%No 70% with 4782 voting. That is about 5 times the number of responses for the other recent polls. Me thinks mischief is afoot. SNM yeah something definitely isnt right... Look at the vote totals: over 5 times the highest of any poll -- someone has an application that is defeating the system. I guess the only valid poll will be the one that has a validation code. You can vote more than once but you will have to take all afternoon to vote a few hunded times. Votebots have rendered the online polls useless. I'm not going to even try anymore! AB I think your right in assuming the online polls are not much use. I was on Senator Dan Rutherfords sight and we were loosing there too. The only way we are going to get concealed carry in Illinois is to get the women involved. They have more clout than we give them credit for. Talk your ladies into raising cane about it like Valinda Rowe does and we will get somewhere. Hope to see you all in Springfield. I wonder if antis trolling this site use it to find these polls and unleash the bots?? You're right about tha ladies. AB Maybe on the next poll, somebody could pm a mod/admin and then they could send out a site wide PM. then the "other side" wouldnt learn about the poll from us. just a thought, not sure if it would work.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.