Ok, so we all know about the 23 prohibited areas...plus the private property option to post. I would like to find some "clarity" in the debate of whether or not the ISP sign apply's to the owners of a piece of property that posts.
It seems that most understand (and appreciate) that an owner of a private property can post the approved ISP sign in order to keep the CCL public from carrying on their property. Some also understand (and argue) that the same owner is allowed to carry on their property regardless of their sign (their property...their rules). Fewer members more, believe that the owner can extend permission to carry upon their posted property to employees and "friends" as well (again, their property....their rules).
Now.....if the above is true, does the same train of thought extend to the areas included within the 23 prohibited areas?
- Can the entity in control of one of the 23 prohibited areas carry themselves?
- Can the entity in control of one of the 23 prohibited areas extend permission to employees and "friends" to carry?
I know that it is a long shot to get some clarity on this debate on an issue such as this from this forum, but I would love to hear everyone's thoughts (and any legislative language to backup positions).