InterestedBystander Posted June 20, 2013 at 02:38 AM Posted June 20, 2013 at 02:38 AM Just saw this referenced over on Ar15.com VILLAGE OF HANOVER PARKVILLAGE BOARDREGULAR MEETINGMunicipal Building: 2121 Lake Street, Hanover Park, IL 60133Thursday, June 20, 20137:30 p.m. On the agenda6-A.11 Motion to pass an Ordinance establishing an assault weapons ban. http://www.hanoverpa...stees/2013.aspx in the packet (sorry for formatting): http://www.hanoverpa...418/130620.aspx TO: Village President and Board of TrusteesFROM: Juliana Maller, Village ManagerDavid Webb, Police ChiefSUBJECT: Assault Weapon Ban OrdinanceACTIONREQUESTED: Approval Concurrence Discussion InformationRECOMMENDED FOR CONSENT AGENDA: Yes NoMEETING DATE: June 20, 2013________________________________________________________________________Executive SummaryPass an Ordinance establishing an assault weapons ban.DiscussionThe General Assembly passed the concealed carry law, HB 183 on June 5, 2013. If thebill is signed into law in its current form, home rule communities will have 10 days from thedate the Governor signs it, to adopt an assault weapons ban if they wish. After that period,HB 183 pre-empts home rule authority from adopting such a ban. Currently, Hanover Parkhas no ordinance banning assault weapons.Due to the fact that there is not a Village Board meeting scheduled for the first Thursday ofJuly, Mayor Craig has requested that the issue be included on the June 20, 2013 regularBoard agenda, in addition to the June 20, 2013 Workshop agenda, in case the Boardwishes to take action.This item was on the June 20, 2013 Workshop agenda for discussion and direction.Recommended ActionMotion to pass an Ordinance establishing an assault weapons ban.Attachments: Letter from Attorney PaulOrdinanceBudgeted Item: ____ Yes _____ No N/ABudgeted Amount: $N/AActual Cost: $N/AAccount Number:Agreement Name: _________________________________________________________________________________Executed By: ____________________________________________R__e__g__u___l_a__r_ _M___e___e__t_i_n__g___ _6__/_2__0__/_1__3_ No person shall manufacture, sell, offer or display for sale, give,lend, transfer ownership of, acquire or possess any assault weaponor large capacity magazine. Any assault weapon or large capacity magazine possessed, sold ortransferred in violation of this Sec. 66-17.5 is hereby declared to becontraband and shall be seized and disposed of in accordance withthe provisions of © Destruction of weapons confiscated, below. Notwithstanding any other penalty provided for in this Section, anyperson found in violation of this section shall be sentenced to notmore than six months imprisonment or fined not less than $500.00and not more than $5,000.00, or both. Any person who, prior to the effective date of the ordinancecodified in this section, was legally in possession of an assaultweapon or large capacity magazine prohibited by this section shallhave 90 days from the effective date of the ordinance to do any ofthe following without being subject to prosecution hereunder:
Molly B. Posted June 20, 2013 at 02:49 AM Posted June 20, 2013 at 02:49 AM Urgent alert posted on IllinoisCarry facebook page. Let's get the word out so there will a good turn out for our side.
LYU370 Posted June 20, 2013 at 03:21 AM Posted June 20, 2013 at 03:21 AM Do I recall correctly, wasn't there a sample lawsuit that could be distributed to officials? Or am I imagining reading that? I live in Streamwood, I can be there tomorrow.
xd9subcompact Posted June 20, 2013 at 03:36 AM Posted June 20, 2013 at 03:36 AM Complete ban on the most popular firearm in history. Someone needs to read Heller.
miztic Posted June 20, 2013 at 03:50 AM Posted June 20, 2013 at 03:50 AM Ex post facto law, automatically unconstitutional.What is wrong with these people.
Molly B. Posted June 20, 2013 at 04:36 AM Posted June 20, 2013 at 04:36 AM Do I recall correctly, wasn't there a sample lawsuit that could be distributed to officials? Or am I imagining reading that? I live in Streamwood, I can be there tomorrow. PM Hi Impact, he was doing that.
skinnyb82 Posted June 20, 2013 at 04:54 AM Posted June 20, 2013 at 04:54 AM Budgeted cost to enforce - N/AForecasted litigation expenses (Village) - $x00,000Forecasted litigation expenses (Plaintiffs) - $x00,000Forecasted settlement arising from litigation - $x00,000Village Budget - Smaller than the aggregate of all of above amounts Sent from my SCH-R530U using Tapatalk 2
LYU370 Posted June 20, 2013 at 05:20 AM Posted June 20, 2013 at 05:20 AM PM Hi Impact, he was doing that.Can't find his name as a member. :-(
Davey Posted June 20, 2013 at 08:54 AM Posted June 20, 2013 at 08:54 AM I'm sure there is a word for when someone wants something only because they can't have it.
RockerXX Posted June 20, 2013 at 09:00 AM Posted June 20, 2013 at 09:00 AM PM Hi Impact, he was doing that.Can't find his name as a member. :-( http://illinoiscarry.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=38884
Hi Impact Posted June 20, 2013 at 01:04 PM Posted June 20, 2013 at 01:04 PM Do I recall correctly, wasn't there a sample lawsuit that could be distributed to officials? Or am I imagining reading that? I live in Streamwood, I can be there tomorrow. PM Hi Impact, he was doing that. Will be emailing model complaint this morning to all at the village. They best think long and hard before doing this.
Hi Impact Posted June 20, 2013 at 01:15 PM Posted June 20, 2013 at 01:15 PM Can anyone locate president and board members' emails? Not on village website. Have email for village attorney so will send to him for now.
Molly B. Posted June 20, 2013 at 01:46 PM Posted June 20, 2013 at 01:46 PM Craig, Rod - Village President 630- 823-5900Cannon, Bill - Trustee 630- 823-5902 Konstanzer, Jenni- Trustee 630- 823-5905 Corral, Eira - Village Clerk 630- 823-5601 Kemper, James. - Trustee 630- 823-5904 Kunkel, Jon - Trustee 630- 823-5906 Roberts, Rick - Trustee 630- 823-5901Zimel, Ed - Trustee 630- 823-5903
C0untZer0 Posted June 20, 2013 at 01:51 PM Posted June 20, 2013 at 01:51 PM I am going to be there tonight... Probably my best chance to meet other IC members. I am guessing this will go like Oswego - are there plans to go out afterward?
Hi Impact Posted June 20, 2013 at 01:59 PM Posted June 20, 2013 at 01:59 PM Emailed complaint to Village attorney, who is from DeKalb. Strange. Still looking for other emails if anyone finds them. Even contact form for village does not allow attachments. May send them note that it was delivered to their attorney.
miztic Posted June 20, 2013 at 02:05 PM Posted June 20, 2013 at 02:05 PM I will be there, if my gf doesn't come with me, I'll be the geek in motorcycle gear. [and an iGold hat]
TyGuy Posted June 20, 2013 at 02:11 PM Posted June 20, 2013 at 02:11 PM I MIGHT come. It doesn't affect me, but my inlaws live in HP, and my father in law is a recent firearms owner. If he wants to go I will join him.
boog Posted June 20, 2013 at 03:24 PM Posted June 20, 2013 at 03:24 PM Myself and my wife will be there tonight. HI IMPACT if you will send any info I will drive to village hall today and personally deliver Boog
C0untZer0 Posted June 20, 2013 at 03:48 PM Posted June 20, 2013 at 03:48 PM I'm never sure if I should wear IGOLD stuff or not. On the one hand I have heard people admonish us to dress business casual, but then I can't tell who may be IC members.
Vaden Posted June 20, 2013 at 04:31 PM Posted June 20, 2013 at 04:31 PM Of course they waited till I was on vacation in Florida to try this crap in my hometown. Molon labe
TheIrishman Posted June 20, 2013 at 04:35 PM Posted June 20, 2013 at 04:35 PM Ill be there with my NRA hat and my iPad with talking points!
TLR Rider Posted June 20, 2013 at 04:48 PM Posted June 20, 2013 at 04:48 PM I am going to be there tonight... Probably my best chance to meet other IC members. I am guessing this will go like Oswego - are there plans to go out afterward? 1. fingers crossed that it does go like the Oswego meeting. 2. if so, be prepaired to, and post here, a place to meet after... Figured I'd say hi to other IC'ers... but everyone was out the door as soon as "seeing none, the motion is tabled". I had to go home and log on to see where everyone was... and by then, the couch and kitty were very happy to see me.
boog Posted June 20, 2013 at 05:08 PM Posted June 20, 2013 at 05:08 PM look for me with an NRA Instructor cap and shirtBoog
Tvandermyde Posted June 20, 2013 at 05:14 PM Posted June 20, 2013 at 05:14 PM ALL look at the working group packet. that meeting is scheduled for 6:00PM not 730 ! ! !
boog Posted June 20, 2013 at 05:36 PM Posted June 20, 2013 at 05:36 PM ALL look at the working group packet. that meeting is scheduled for 6:00PM not 730 ! ! !Todd, are coming? If so Heini is on me after.Boog
blueliner Posted June 20, 2013 at 06:07 PM Posted June 20, 2013 at 06:07 PM You may not scare the Village Attorney by sending him/her the sample complaint. They may use it to propose an amendment to the ordinance to make your sample complaint moot. Also, Village Attorneys like this are private lawyers that get paid hourly, so a threat of litigation with high fees and hourly costs won't scare the very lawyer that would be tasked with defending the Ordinance and reap those many hours of fees. You need to scare the Trustees with the threat of litigation, not the lawyer that wants the billable hours the litigation would bring.
Mike A Posted June 20, 2013 at 06:19 PM Posted June 20, 2013 at 06:19 PM A couple years ago I was a Hanover Park resident and had traded some emails with the Village President, Rodney Craig. Here are the two email addresses he sent me mail from. I would email him at both addresses, but it seems he uses the comcast.net one more than the hanoverparkillinois.org on. Wouldn't surprise me if he wanted to keep emails off the village email and therefore out of the public record. rodney.craig@comcast.net and rcraig@hanoverparkillinois.org
Molly B. Posted June 20, 2013 at 06:25 PM Posted June 20, 2013 at 06:25 PM · Hidden by Molly B., June 20, 2013 at 06:29 PM - No reason given Hidden by Molly B., June 20, 2013 at 06:29 PM - No reason given ALL look at the working group packet. that meeting is scheduled for 6:00PM not 730 ! ! ! There are two parts to the packet. One part dealing with tonight's meeting at 7:30, a second part dealing with a workshop meeting on June 6 where the carry bill was discussed and that meeting was at 6 pm I think the meeting tonight is at 7:30 - but get there early to get a seat!
Molly B. Posted June 20, 2013 at 06:31 PM Posted June 20, 2013 at 06:31 PM Todd is correct. It will be discussed in the "workshop" group at 6 p.m and then I assume it will be voted on during the regular meeting at 7:30 pm http://www.hpil.org/getattachment/4836e918-d62a-4beb-90a7-892e0f78cd75/130620bw.aspx
Tvandermyde Posted June 20, 2013 at 06:32 PM Posted June 20, 2013 at 06:32 PM no not going to be there I'm working on it from here
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.