Jump to content

Illinois General Assembly 6/19/2013 - Regular and Special Sessions


mauserme

Recommended Posts

Posted

When we last met on 5/31/2013, the Spring Session ended with passage of HB183 - Firearms Concealed Carry Act and HB1189, a relatively toothless requirement to confirm the validity of a purchaser's FOID card before completing a sale, and a requirement to report a lost or stolen firearm. Interestingly, the latter requirement applies only to FOID card holders, inexplicably failing to include those illegally in possession of a firearm from this mandate.

 

HB1346, amended to become a magazine ban, failed that day 28/31/0

 

 

 

 

The House is scheduled for 12:00 Noon and the Senate for 11:30 AM.

 

Although motions remain on HB1157 and HB3217, keeping them on the regular session calendar, it is very unlikely we would see any action on these today.

Posted

.

House Calendar

 

12:00 Noon

 

House Audio/Video Link

 

 

 

Livestream Link to current and archived events.

 

 

 

HB1157 Criminal Law-Tech

 

Oppose

 

House Sponsor: Madigan

Status: Motion to Recommit

 

Synopsis As Introduced

 

Amends the Criminal Code of 2012. Makes a technical change in a Section concerning exemptions from the statutes concerning unlawful use of weapons and aggravated unlawful use of a weapon.

 

House Amendment 1 - Davis, Will - Creates the Illninois Firearm Safety Act - Oppose

 

House Amendment 2 - Davis, Will - Registration - Oppose

 

House Amendment 3- Sims - Mental Health Evaluation - Oppose

 

House Amendment 4 - Zalewski - Locked Storage - Oppose

 

House Amendment 5 - Feigenholtz - Mental Health/Relatives and Acquaintances - Oppose

 

House Amendment 6 - Acevedo - Lost or Stolen - Oppose

 

House Amendment 7 - Currie - Mental Health/Increased Fees - Oppose

 

House Amendment 8 - Cassidy - Health Care Reporting Required - Oppose

 

House Amendment 10 - Mitchell, Christian - Creates a registry of transfers - Oppose

 

 

 

 

 

HB3217 Criminal Cd - Firearm Offenses

 

Neutral

 

House Sponsor: Durkin, Reboletti, McSweeney, Cross, Cabello, Tracy, Sacia, Kosel, Pritchard, Brauer, DeLuca, Roth, Hatcher, Hays, Bellock, Pihos

 

Status: Motion to Discharge

 

Synopsis As Introduced

 

Amends the Criminal Code of 2012. Enhances the penalties for certain violations of the statutes concerning unlawful use or possession of weapons by felons, aggravated unlawful use of a weapon, and unlawful possession of a firearm by a street gang member. Amends the Unified Code of Corrections. Provides that a prisoner serving a sentence for unlawful use or possession of a weapon by felons, aggravated discharge of a firearm, being an armed habitual criminal, defacing identification marks of firearms, unlawful possession of a firearm by a street gang member, or certain unlawful sale or delivery of firearms violations shall receive no more than 4.5 days of sentence credit for each month of his or her sentence of imprisonment. Effective immediately

 

 

 

House Calendar 6-19-2013 - Regular Session.pdf

 

House Calendar 6-19-2013 - Special Session 1.pdf

 

House Supplemental Calendar 1 6-19-2013.pdf

.

.

Posted

.

 

Senate Calendar

 

11:30 AM

 

Senate Audio/Video Link

 

Livestream Link to current and archived events.

 

 

 

 

 

SB851 Safety Tech

 

Oppose

 

Senate Sponsor: Raoul, Collins

Status: Third Reading

 

Senate Amendment 1 Pending - Lost or Stolen Firearms

 

 

 

 

 

SB1002 Criminal Law Tech

 

Oppose (SA1, SA2, SA3, and SA4 Magazine Ban with Thespian Exemption pending).

 

Senate Sponsor: Kotowski, Collins, Hunter, Lightford

Status: Third Reading

 

Synopsis As Introduced

 

Amends the Criminal Code of 2012. Makes a technical change in a Section concerning the short title.

 

 

 

 

 

SB1003 Criminal Law Tech

 

Oppose (Senate Amendment 1 and Senate Amendment 2 Pending)

 

Senate Sponsor: Muñoz, Lightford, Hastings, Delgado

Status: Second Reading

 

SA1 to SB1003 Criminal Law Tech - Senate version of HB2265

 

SA2 to SB1003 Criminal Law Tech - Senate version of HB2265

 

 

 

 

 

SB2193 Criminal Cd - Firearm Transport

 

Neutral

 

Senate Sponsor: Forby, Jacobs, Haine, Manar, McCann, Koehler, Holmes, Sullivan

 

House Sponsor: Phelps, Sullivan, Beiser, Bost, Costello, Reboletti, Verschoore, Sacia, Smiddy, Cloonen, Sandack, Unes, Hammond, Travy. Jackson, Bradley, Scherer, Mautino, Reis, Demmer, Mitchell, Brown, Hatcher, Kay, Halbrook, Davidsmeyer, Meier, Franks, Farnham, Sosnowski, Poe, Brauer, Leitch

 

Status: Motion to Concur (Postponed)

 

House Amendment 1

 

Creates the Firearm Concealed Carry Act.

 

House Amendment 2

 

Creates the Firearm Concealed Carry Act (technical corrections)

 

 

 

Senate Calendar 6-19-2013 - Regular Session.pdf

 

Senate Calendar 6-19-2013 - Special Session 1.pdf

 

.

Posted

When we last met on 5/31/2013, the Spring Session ended with passage of HB183 - Firearms Concealed Carry Act and HB1189, a relatively toothless requirement to confirm the validity of a purchaser's FOID card before completing a sale, and a requirement to report a lost or stolen firearm. Interestingly, the latter requirement applies only to FOID card holders, inexplicably failing to include those illegally in possession of a firearm from this mandate.

 

It is not inexplicable. It would be unconstitutional to require people prohibited from possessing firearms to report they had one in their possession as that would be a clear violation of the 5th.

Posted

When we last met on 5/31/2013, the Spring Session ended with passage of HB183 - Firearms Concealed Carry Act and HB1189, a relatively toothless requirement to confirm the validity of a purchaser's FOID card before completing a sale, and a requirement to report a lost or stolen firearm. Interestingly, the latter requirement applies only to FOID card holders, inexplicably failing to include those illegally in possession of a firearm from this mandate.

 

It is not inexplicable. It would be unconstitutional to require people prohibited from possessing firearms to report they had one in their possession as that would be a clear violation of the 5th.

 

LOL I thought of that too, but then decided a little poetic license would be far more useful.

Posted

Is there a time limit on how long a special session can last? IE a limit of something like two weeks or can they go on indefinitely until a bill is passed?

 

I could be wrong but I think the length of the session is determined by the Speaker.

Posted
I wish Madigan would just tell Quinn to do the damn AV on 183 while they're in this special session so we can override it and get it the heck over with
Posted

Dan Duffy comment, he doesn't sound enthused or optimistic

 

 

Dan Duffy

1 hour ago ·

Special Session Day: The Governor has called us into special session today. It will cost taxpayers an additional $43,000 (a new teacher’s annual salary) to bring the whole General Assembly to Springfield. Will we solve the Pension problem today and vote on a Pension Reform bill…or will we just sit, form a “committee” to waste more taxpayer money, and then return home?? That is up to the Democrat majority leaders. What do you think we will do? (I will keep you updated as we progress)

Posted

Interestingly, the latter requirement applies only to FOID card holders, inexplicably failing to include those illegally in possession of a firearm from this mandate.

The law would probably be unconstitutional if it also applied to non-FOID card holders illegally in possession of the firearm. Laws that require a person to inform the government that they have committed a crime are usually found to be in violation of the 5th Amendment's prohibition against forced self-incrimination. If the law required a person to inform the police that they had lost a firearm that they were illegally possessing in the first place, that law would be forcing a person to be a witness against themselves as to the illegal possession of a firearm.

Posted

Interestingly, the latter requirement applies only to FOID card holders, inexplicably failing to include those illegally in possession of a firearm from this mandate.

The law would probably be unconstitutional if it also applied to non-FOID card holders illegally in possession of the firearm. Laws that require a person to inform the government that they have committed a crime are usually found to be in violation of the 5th Amendment's prohibition against forced self-incrimination. If the law required a person to inform the police that they had lost a firearm that they were illegally possessing in the first place, that law would be forcing a person to be a witness against themselves as to the illegal possession of a firearm.

Well there's a simple solution: repeal the FOID act and make the reporting law apply to everyone

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...