I re-read amendment 5 and it says "Firearm" singular...
If this has been talked about before, I'm sorry, but some of the threads on 183 got so so long I couldn't read through all of them.
Does HB 183 allow for carrying 2 handguns?
Started by
C0untZer0
, Yesterday, 06:43 AM
8 replies to this topic
#1
Posted Yesterday, 06:43 AM
‘Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive...those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.‘
- C. S. Lewis
- C. S. Lewis
#2
Posted Yesterday, 12:56 PM
I read nothing to indicate the number of weapons,but then again,I ain't the sharpest knife in the drawer.
Patrick Henry: "Are we at last brought to such a humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our own defense".
"God made men,but Colt made them equals"
"Guns don't kill people..husbands who come home early do" -Larry The Cable Guy
"Illinois: Will the Defendant Please Rise?"
"si vis pacem, para bellum"
"God made men,but Colt made them equals"
"Guns don't kill people..husbands who come home early do" -Larry The Cable Guy
"Illinois: Will the Defendant Please Rise?"
"si vis pacem, para bellum"
#3
Posted Yesterday, 01:23 PM
I saw nothing on number of firearms either.
NRA, ISRA, all around cool guy
#4
Posted Yesterday, 01:54 PM
There is no specific number you can not carry.
This was debates on the floor, some representatives asked how may firearms law enforcement were allowed to carry.
The misinformed representative thought law enforcement officers could only carry one firearm and that other citizens should be limited to one firearm as well.
This was debates on the floor, some representatives asked how may firearms law enforcement were allowed to carry.
The misinformed representative thought law enforcement officers could only carry one firearm and that other citizens should be limited to one firearm as well.
Life Member, Gun Owners of America
Life Member, NRA
Life Member, Oath Keepers
Life Member, Second Amendment Foundation
Life Member, NRA
Life Member, Oath Keepers
Life Member, Second Amendment Foundation
#5
Posted Yesterday, 04:31 PM
Why do you need more than 1? You trying to make up for a lack of something?
Lol
Lol
Shall issue with preemption
#6
Posted Yesterday, 04:34 PM
it does use the singular in a least a few places. I don't know if that is meaningful or not.
bob
Disclaimers: I am not a lawyer, cop, soldier, gunsmith, politician, plumber, electrician, or a professional practitioner of many of the other things I comment on in this forum.
http://ilbob.blogspot.com/
Disclaimers: I am not a lawyer, cop, soldier, gunsmith, politician, plumber, electrician, or a professional practitioner of many of the other things I comment on in this forum.
http://ilbob.blogspot.com/
#7
Posted Yesterday, 04:37 PM
A wise man said " two is one and one is none."
NRA, ISRA, all around cool guy
#8
Posted Yesterday, 11:06 PM
I just though he wanted to do it to tick off Arroyo.
The mind that aims at a select militia, must be influenced by a truly anti-republican principle; and when we see many men disposed to practice upon it, whenever they can prevail, no wonder true republicans are for carefully guarding against it. --Richard Henry Lee, The Pennsylvania Gazette, Feb. 20, 1788
#9
Posted Yesterday, 11:35 PM
If you carry one firearm, and then you carry one more firearm, I don't see a problem unless you try to redefine the meaning of firearm.
I'm not a lawyer but if I was I think I'd be pretty good at it, lol.
I'm not a lawyer but if I was I think I'd be pretty good at it, lol.
Have all boated who fish? Have all boated who fish?
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











