Cullerton explains his position...
#1
Posted Yesterday, 05:33 PM
http://www.illinoiss...edemocrats.com/
#2
Posted Yesterday, 05:35 PM
#3
Posted Yesterday, 05:46 PM
But I sure do agree with that reptile reference above....
Credit: Prairie Pucker via Bud...
NRA, ISRA, SAF... USAF Vet.. Former LEO...
#4
Posted Yesterday, 05:53 PM
#5
Posted Yesterday, 05:59 PM
Really Mr Quinn is only good at "Vacations" under the title of business for Illinois" junkets"... on taxpayers dime.... and attending funerals for war dead.... Besides that worthless.
snooter, on 25 May 2013 - 05:53 PM, said:
Edited by BillR, Yesterday, 06:02 PM.
#6
Posted Yesterday, 06:56 PM
#8
Posted Yesterday, 07:16 PM
Enough has been compromised and given for both sides.
Chicago isn't special, they are flawed and gun control will not fix that. Current laws in effect already prove that point. Fix their judicial system if they want change. No more plea bargains, no more probation. Enforce the laws that are written for the criminals and no more implementing more laws on the innocent.
Edited by cls74, Yesterday, 07:30 PM.
#9
Posted Yesterday, 07:20 PM
BillR, on 25 May 2013 - 05:33 PM, said:
This would be an absolute disaster. You could carry in Cook/Chicago (maybe) but you (any Illinois resident) would to meet their other gun rules - e.g. mag capacity limits (10/12 now, maybe less in future), no threaded barrels, no laser accessories, transport rules (cased and not immediate accessable and broken down), big $ fines & jail time. Residents still limited to rules for home storage, registration, CFP all on top of CCW fees. And any other city could create any rules they want. Once again, legal on one side of the street, illegal on the other. Oh, you can get a CCW license, but good luck not getting busted on some other local gun law.
This would not be one law one state, it would be one state, hundreds of laws. Once again, absolute disaster.
Edited by kingjames, Yesterday, 07:20 PM.
#10
Posted Yesterday, 07:58 PM
#11
Posted Yesterday, 08:14 PM
BillR, on 25 May 2013 - 05:59 PM, said:
Really Mr Quinn is only good at "Vacations" under the title of business for Illinois" junkets"... on taxpayers dime.... and attending funerals for war dead.... Besides that worthless.
snooter, on 25 May 2013 - 05:53 PM, said:
i can agree..but quinn has 1 big elephant..he only needs to win cook county and st clair county downstate..if he picks up cairo, ill so be it..he gets in again....what the deal is-is 2014 may produce repub gains and i think madigan knows it...this is not a slam dunk yet...we will find out this week how the attitudes play out between the 3 (madigan, cullerton, quinn)..goin be a fun witch...my take-god speed
ps: raoul bill is DOA (883)..cullerton is in the corner and out of moves unless cullerton wants the cliff..quinn has a play left which may well determine cliff or post future political success...i dont really buy into this whole lisa sceniro...there is a bunch of people who just do not like her and may be more than dont like quinn (the old we know what we have with quinn)
ps..the whole play here is pension reform and that means unions
Edited by snooter, Yesterday, 08:21 PM.
#12
Posted Yesterday, 08:19 PM
He is a Bloomberg wanna-be
Edited by StreuB1, Yesterday, 08:19 PM.
My level of home protection is measured in millimeters.
5.56 millimeters to be exact.
ONE STATE- ONE LAW
#13
Posted Yesterday, 08:28 PM
Edited by BillR, Yesterday, 08:28 PM.
#14
Posted Yesterday, 10:31 PM
#15
Posted Yesterday, 10:34 PM
Oh well. I am not gonna venture a guess. I'll sit back and watch the biggest pissing match in recent Illinois history.
Edited by TyGuy, Yesterday, 10:35 PM.
#16
Posted Yesterday, 10:44 PM
TyGuy, on 25 May 2013 - 10:34 PM, said:
Oh well. I am not gonna venture a guess. I'll sit back and watch the biggest pissing match in recent Illinois history.
#17
Posted Yesterday, 10:49 PM
#18
Posted Yesterday, 10:51 PM
#20
Posted Yesterday, 10:54 PM
#21
Posted Today, 12:16 AM
Sent from my SCH-R530U using Tapatalk 2
#22
Posted Today, 12:38 AM
xd9subcompact, on 25 May 2013 - 10:31 PM, said:
If I was to guess, that is pretty much what I see being done...
skinnyb82, on 26 May 2013 - 12:16 AM, said:
Correction Cullerton can't amended SB2193 but he can plagiarize the wording with his changes and paste it into a gutted/amended HB183 and kick it back to the House where Madigan won't be able to gut or change the kicked back HB183, he gets the same yay/nay vote he sent Cullerton... And we have a stand off, IMO Cullerton catches the media spotlight and lime light by saying he made a few minor tweaks to Madigan's bill accepting 95% of it but he put some 'save the children of Chicago' protections in place... IMO this puts Madigan in a tough place, accept minor compromises to what is essentially his bill, or face the media egg on the face for not accepting a small compromise that 'protects the children' while letting 95% of his bill pass as he authored it...
It's a game of chicken now...
Edited by RockerXX, Today, 12:39 AM.
What weighs six ounces, sits in a tree and is very dangerous?
A sparrow with a machine gun!

#23
Posted Today, 03:20 AM
Sent from my SCH-R530U using Tapatalk 2
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











