63 replies to this topic

[TyGuy]

.

Edited by TyGuy, Yesterday, 11:37 PM.

[TyGuy]

.

Edited by TyGuy, Yesterday, 11:37 PM.

[TyGuy]

Velocigoose, on 22 May 2013 - 09:15 PM, said:

This bill is trash and anyone that supports it should feel bad. ...

BTW - it's a joke folks.

Edited by TyGuy, Yesterday, 11:37 PM.

[gangrel]

woldy2, on 22 May 2013 - 08:47 PM, said:

chevsuz12, on 22 May 2013 - 08:40 PM, said:

I agree with most, that we could have better, but this isnt that bad! I am currently in Los Angeles and was discussing this with some of the folks here, and they would love to have this bill!  Do what nearly all other states have done, take what we can then work to make it better!

I am ok with the overall bill......but have some concerns.  My biggest being training.
I am confused by the wording on p.32 that states the training requirements for instructors.  It states the various requirements for law enforcement instructors, then for the 6th requirement it states the word "and".
I think this is a mistake, if it stated "or" then I would think his would allow NRA Certified Instructors.

Any thoughts?

It allows for NRA handgun instructors

Where did you see that?  'Cause that's not how I read it at all...

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2

Edited by gangrel, Today, 12:26 AM.