mauserme Posted May 17, 2013 at 02:50 AM Posted May 17, 2013 at 02:50 AM Updates SA 1 to SB1002 has been assigned to the Executive committee. SA 2 to SB1002 - Creates the Illinois Public Safety Act ( a magazine ban) SA 3 to HB183 has been filed and assigned to Assignments (and subsequently approved for consideration). The House stands adjourned until 5/20/2013 @ 2:00 PM. The Senate stands adjourned until 5/20/2013 @ 12:00 Noon.
mauserme Posted May 17, 2013 at 02:50 AM Author Posted May 17, 2013 at 02:50 AM Yesterday in Senate committee, Senate Amendment 1 to HB183 Gun Safety and Responsibility Act was approved for consideration and Senate Amendment 2 was filed. The former proposes to create the Gun Safety and Responsibility Act, a panoply of gun control measures the sponsor hopes will satisfy the 7th Circuit Court ruling requiring a means of defensive carry, while the latter preempts home rule after a 90 day period of no preemption. We oppose all. With the addition of this bill to our watch list I am removing HB848 but will continue to monitor it in the background. In floor action, the Senate passed HB1652 Wildlife Tech (Use of Drones) as amended. The bill will return to the House for concurrence. The House passed SB1831 Wildlife Permission Designee and, having passed both bodies, it will now be sent to the governor. The House is scheduled for 9:30 AM today and the Senate for 10:00 AM..
mauserme Posted May 17, 2013 at 02:51 AM Author Posted May 17, 2013 at 02:51 AM .House Calendar 9:30 AM House Audio/Video Link How a Bill Becomes a Law Livestream Link to current and archived events. HB1157 Criminal Law-Tech Oppose House Sponsor: MadiganStatus: Second Reading/Motion to Recommit Synopsis As Introduced Amends the Criminal Code of 2012. Makes a technical change in a Section concerning exemptions from the statutes concerning unlawful use of weapons and aggravated unlawful use of a weapon. House Amendment 1 - Davis, Will - Creates the Illninois Firearm Safety Act - Oppose House Amendment 2 - Davis, Will - Registration - Oppose House Amendment 3- Sims - Mental Health Evaluation - Oppose House Amendment 4 - Zalewski - Locked Storage - Oppose House Amendment 5 - Feigenholtz - Mental Health/Relatives and Acquaintances - Oppose House Amendment 6 - Acevedo - Lost or Stolen - Oppose House Amendment 7 - Currie - Mental Health/Increased Fees - Oppose House Amendment 8 - Cassidy - Health Care Reporting Required - Oppose House Amendment 10 - Mitchell, Christian - Creates a registry of transfers - Oppose HB3217 Criminal Cd - Firearm Offenses Neutral House Sponsor: Durkin, Reboletti, McSweeney, Cross, Cabello, Tracy, Sacia, Kosel, Pritchard, Brauer, DeLuca, Roth, Hatcher, Hays, Bellock, Pihos Status: Motion to Discharge Synopsis As Introduced Amends the Criminal Code of 2012. Enhances the penalties for certain violations of the statutes concerning unlawful use or possession of weapons by felons, aggravated unlawful use of a weapon, and unlawful possession of a firearm by a street gang member. Amends the Unified Code of Corrections. Provides that a prisoner serving a sentence for unlawful use or possession of a weapon by felons, aggravated discharge of a firearm, being an armed habitual criminal, defacing identification marks of firearms, unlawful possession of a firearm by a street gang member, or certain unlawful sale or delivery of firearms violations shall receive no more than 4.5 days of sentence credit for each month of his or her sentence of imprisonment. Effective immediately Next Days Scheduled House: 5/20/2013Senate: 5/18/2013 House Calendar 5-17-2013.pdf.
mauserme Posted May 17, 2013 at 02:51 AM Author Posted May 17, 2013 at 02:51 AM .Senate Calendar 10:00 AM Senate Audio/Video Link Livestream Link to current and archived events. HB183 Gun Safety and Responsibility Act Oppose House Sponsor: LangSenate Sponsor: RaoulStatus: Third Reading Senate Amendment 1 Creates the Gun Safety and Responsibility Act SB1002 Criminal Law Tech Oppose (SA1 (Magazine ban with confiscation pending)) Senate Sponsor: Kotowski, CollinsStatus: Third Reading Synopsis As Introduced Amends the Criminal Code of 2012. Makes a technical change in a Section concerning the short title. SB1003 Criminal Law Tech Oppose (Senate Amendment 1 and Senate Amendment 2 Pending) Senate Sponsor: Muñoz, Lightford, Hastings, DelgadoStatus: Second Reading SA1 to SB1003 Criminal Law Tech - Senate version of HB2265 SA2 to SB1003 Criminal Law Tech - Senate version of HB2265 Senate Calendar 5-17-2013.pdf.
spu69 Posted May 17, 2013 at 02:59 AM Posted May 17, 2013 at 02:59 AM I had to try to be first on the thread once!
45 whit Posted May 17, 2013 at 03:03 AM Posted May 17, 2013 at 03:03 AM Lets hope it has the best ending!
cm.stites Posted May 17, 2013 at 03:42 AM Posted May 17, 2013 at 03:42 AM Lets hope it has the best ending!least you didnt say happy ending with Spu being in Ty
spu69 Posted May 17, 2013 at 03:45 AM Posted May 17, 2013 at 03:45 AM Neither of us would be happy about that...
cls74 Posted May 17, 2013 at 04:31 AM Posted May 17, 2013 at 04:31 AM SA2 oHB183. I don't see any senate committee's scheduled tomorrow. Can a pending amendment on a bill be ignored or will they do an in the opinion if the speaker the no's have it(since it is preemption). I'm guessing they don't want it adopted as it is preemptive and would require supermajority.
skinnyb82 Posted May 17, 2013 at 04:46 AM Posted May 17, 2013 at 04:46 AM Yeah they blow off amendments all of the time...in the House. dunno about the Senate. Madigan has zero respect for procedure while Culletton...does....sorta. Sent from my SCH-R530U using Tapatalk 2
cm.stites Posted May 17, 2013 at 04:47 AM Posted May 17, 2013 at 04:47 AM SA2 oHB183. I don't see any senate committee's scheduled tomorrow. Can a pending amendment on a bill be ignored or will they do an in the opinion if the speaker the no's have it(since it is preemption). I'm guessing they don't want it adopted as it is preemptive and would require supermajority.its not preemptive
CGT Posted May 17, 2013 at 10:05 AM Posted May 17, 2013 at 10:05 AM Off of KMOV facebook page.IL lawmakers will debate a conceal carry bill today that includes "Home Rule." Which would give cities with more than 25,000 people would have the right to make further on where citizens could carry guns. Laura Hettiger has reaction from senators on both sides of the aisle which may surprise you. Flip on N4TM at 5:30 and 6:30 a.m.
snooter Posted May 17, 2013 at 10:59 AM Posted May 17, 2013 at 10:59 AM Off of KMOV facebook page.IL lawmakers will debate a conceal carry bill today that includes "Home Rule." Which would give cities with more than 25,000 people would have the right to make further on where citizens could carry guns. Laura Hettiger has reaction from senators on both sides of the aisle which may surprise you. Flip on N4TM at 5:30 and 6:30 a.m. the line about lawmakers believing its chicago against everybody else is telling..i suspect this garbage is toast and would be surprised if chicago can get anything passed..its not real hard..shall issue..affordable training...isp doing its job and issuing permits in a timely matter...limited carry restrictions..and 99% of us would be happy..i am so fed up with chicago dictating law to us 280 miles to the south i am about to puke..(not to mention the raping of our money down here to go up there for services we can never use)
mauserme Posted May 17, 2013 at 11:16 AM Author Posted May 17, 2013 at 11:16 AM SA2 oHB183. I don't see any senate committee's scheduled tomorrow. Can a pending amendment on a bill be ignored or will they do an in the opinion if the speaker the no's have it(since it is preemption). I'm guessing they don't want it adopted as it is preemptive and would require supermajority. I posted somewhere last night that it would have to be approved by a substantive committee in order to be considered. After looking at the Senate rules this morning I think there are ways they could skirt that, though it would be unusual. And yes, they could proceed without the amendment. I'll add that there's probably at least some chance this bill could pass the Senate but, per Todd's posts, won't survive the House. Some of what happens in the Senate will depend on whether they're interested in actually solving the problem or just making political statements as the House did early in the session.
Livewire18 Posted May 17, 2013 at 11:27 AM Posted May 17, 2013 at 11:27 AM ....actually solving the problem or just making political statements as the House did early in the session. Isnt that what 90% of the house/senate does is make a political statement? How often is a problem really "solved"?
cls74 Posted May 17, 2013 at 02:23 PM Posted May 17, 2013 at 02:23 PM SA2 oHB183. I don't see any senate committee's scheduled tomorrow. Can a pending amendment on a bill be ignored or will they do an in the opinion if the speaker the no's have it(since it is preemption). I'm guessing they don't want it adopted as it is preemptive and would require supermajority.its not preemptive Does this have another meaning? From Mauserme's post while the latter preempts home rule after a 90 day period of no preemption
Livewire18 Posted May 17, 2013 at 02:29 PM Posted May 17, 2013 at 02:29 PM I am in meetings almost all day, so if there is any excitement in the GA today I will have to keep up on it in this thread and just keep refreshing whenever I have a chance. Thanks in advance for all those that will be keeping people posted.
Glock23 Posted May 17, 2013 at 02:30 PM Posted May 17, 2013 at 02:30 PM SA2 oHB183. I don't see any senate committee's scheduled tomorrow. Can a pending amendment on a bill be ignored or will they do an in the opinion if the speaker the no's have it(since it is preemption). I'm guessing they don't want it adopted as it is preemptive and would require supermajority.its not preemptive Does this have another meaning? From Mauserme's post while the latter preempts home rule after a 90 day period of no preemptionThe 90 day window for home rule units to enact their own local ordinances adding more restrictions... if it adds restrictions to the bill as it is written, it is not preemption, as at the end of that 90 days, there will be a potpourri of different rules and restrictions all over the state.
mauserme Posted May 17, 2013 at 02:31 PM Author Posted May 17, 2013 at 02:31 PM The House is convening. Representatives Jefferson, and Soto are absent from the Democrat side, and Representatives Durkin, Osmond, and Schmitz from the Republican side.
mauserme Posted May 17, 2013 at 02:41 PM Author Posted May 17, 2013 at 02:41 PM The House calendar originally attached to post 3 was for yesterday. The 3 people who downloaded that should get a new copy, now attached in place of the old one.
Livewire18 Posted May 17, 2013 at 02:41 PM Posted May 17, 2013 at 02:41 PM The House is convening. Representatives Jefferson, and Soto are absent from the Democrat side, and Representatives Durkin, Osmond, and Schmitz from the Republican side. Hmmm. That's an awful lot gone for what was suppose to be happening today.
Scots Posted May 17, 2013 at 02:44 PM Posted May 17, 2013 at 02:44 PM The House is convening. Representatives Jefferson, and Soto are absent from the Democrat side, and Representatives Durkin, Osmond, and Schmitz from the Republican side. Hmmm. That's an awful lot gone for what was suppose to be happening today. Nothing really in the house today - the action, if any, is supposed to be in the Senate.
mauserme Posted May 17, 2013 at 03:05 PM Author Posted May 17, 2013 at 03:05 PM The Senate is convening.
mauserme Posted May 17, 2013 at 03:21 PM Author Posted May 17, 2013 at 03:21 PM Amend 1 to SB1002 was just assigned to Executive. This is the magazine ban/confiscation bill
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.