Jump to content


Ok, so they didn't ban PMAGs after all....

Cant make up their minds?

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
1 reply to this topic

#1 I Hate Gunlaws

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 563 posts
  • Joined: 06-November 07

Posted 09 June 2012 - 08:07 PM

Apparently the Army acknowledges that TACOM's message was "poorly written and not intended as a directive on the use of PMAGs".

“At best, the message is incomplete; at worst the message allows soldiers to jump to the wrong conclusions,” Bourke said. “Maintenance Information Messages [from TACOM] are permissive. They are not an order. They are not a directive. All content and direction in those messages are optional for the recipient.”

http://www.military....html?ESRC=eb.nl
Posted Image

#2 SFC Stu

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 936 posts
  • Joined: 12-April 05

Posted 09 June 2012 - 09:21 PM

The message made a job for someone that did not have a clue!