Jump to content


Why Madigan wouldn't let the new CCW Bill come out of committee


  • Please log in to reply
58 replies to this topic

#31 chip

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 248 posts
  • Joined: 08-May 11

Posted 04 June 2012 - 09:22 PM

jkrzos,
I emailed Ms. Rowe and the ISRA Prez. Standing by to step up!

#32 Buzzard

    Member

  • Members
  • 8,658 posts
  • Joined: 29-March 07

Posted 04 June 2012 - 09:46 PM

Wouldn't it require a change of the state's constitution to bring term limits in Illinois?

Several people have spoken in favor of term limits. I agree with the member(s) that believe the ballot box serves as term limits. If you have a pol that is doing a great job, it seems foolish to force them out of office. I'm EXTREMELY happy with my Rep and Senator and the job they are doing. Both Rep. Jim Sacia and Sen. Tim Bivens even attended my benefit to help raise money for my medical bills. (Now in excess of a million dollars.) Not just there for appearances - Rep. Sacia served as a "celebrity auctioneer" and Sen. Bivens bought several big ticket items. I can't thank them enough.

And I also can't envision House Speaker Mike Madigan showing up for anything that didn't benefit him or his law firm clients.
"The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes,
but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda,
they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles."  — Jeff Cooper, The Art of the Rifle

#33 FarmHand357

    Member

  • Supporting Members Team
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 266 posts
  • Joined: 03-May 11

Posted 05 June 2012 - 06:06 PM

View PostI HATE ILLINOIS, on 04 June 2012 - 07:57 PM, said:

another year down, what happened bud,, you guaranted rtc and i said no, but i was right now like ive said not now not next, its wishfull thinking for a few, yes few years

I find relentless optimism far more appealing than undying pessimism (or what some would call realism).  Nevertheless, as a glass-is-half-full kinda guy, RTC is closer than it's ever been...
Punish the crime, not the freedom

#34 vess1

    Member

  • Supporting Members Team
  • 1,405 posts
  • Joined: 13-June 04

Posted 07 June 2012 - 06:56 PM

View PostFarmHand357, on 05 June 2012 - 06:06 PM, said:

View PostI HATE ILLINOIS, on 04 June 2012 - 07:57 PM, said:

another year down, what happened bud,, you guaranted rtc and i said no, but i was right now like ive said not now not next, its wishfull thinking for a few, yes few years

I find relentless optimism far more appealing than undying pessimism (or what some would call realism).  Nevertheless, as a glass-is-half-full kinda guy, RTC is closer than it's ever been...

  I am normally pessimistic but I agree with you that it is closer than it's ever been.  I don't know if there's ever been so much talk about it and exposure.  The pressure has definitely ratcheted up a notch now that we're the last state to have nothing on the books.    It seems like the topic is in the news more often too.   You get the feeling that something has to happen.

#35 Federal Farmer

    David Lawson

  • Moderator
  • 8,021 posts
  • Joined: 03-January 07

Posted 07 June 2012 - 09:26 PM

Nobody ever stopped an innovation by being optimistic, but certainly pessimism can have a inhibitory effect...

Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2

Quote

People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men [and women] stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
--George Orwell

#36 jkrzos

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 586 posts
  • Joined: 22-March 08

Posted 07 June 2012 - 11:05 PM

Chip,

Thanks very much for your offer.  You're in for a cold one from at  IGOLD 2013.

jkrzos
Retired Cowboy Action Shooter, PPC Shooter
Tincan Sailor, Trusty Shellback
NRA & ISRA Life Member, ISRA RSO

MY 1911 BEATS A 911 CALL!

If you don't stand behind our Troops, Please stand in front of them

“Give me a fast ship for I intend to go into Harms Way”

During WW2, no other Naval Unit eclipsed the record of the little beavers lead by Captain “31 knot Arleigh Burke.”  There are Sailors and then there are DESTROYER SAILORS.  Fast, sleek, they seek out the enemy at point blank range

#37 scout26

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 158 posts
  • Joined: 24-August 07

Posted 09 June 2012 - 12:04 PM

The fact is, we won't know what we have (or can or can't do) until we get a ruling.  And that ruling could be anything, running the gamet of possiblities.  Having said that, the there is a strong chaance that we will get a "favorable" ruling, considering the precidents of Heller, McDonald and Ezell (coming from this very circuit).

We'll just have to wait and see.

#38 Gray Peterson

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 349 posts
  • Joined: 02-August 04

Posted 09 June 2012 - 01:29 PM

Term limits in a blue state is very bad.  See California.

#39 Jason4567

    Member

  • Supporting Members Team
  • 1,049 posts
  • Joined: 19-March 12

Posted 11 June 2012 - 10:20 AM

View PostGray Peterson, on 09 June 2012 - 01:29 PM, said:

Term limits in a blue state is very bad.  See California.
Care to elaborate?

Quote

IS YOUR RIFLE A GRENADE LAUNCHER?   YES NO
From the Chicago Firearm Registration form

#40 Drylok

    Member

  • Members
  • 7,046 posts
  • Joined: 15-February 08

Posted 11 June 2012 - 10:39 AM

View PostJason4567, on 11 June 2012 - 10:20 AM, said:

View PostGray Peterson, on 09 June 2012 - 01:29 PM, said:

Term limits in a blue state is very bad. See California.
Care to elaborate?

Ya, I'm curious too
"A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises, I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball, and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun therefore be your constant companion of your walks"
-Thomas Jefferson-

Now two flags fly above my land that really sum up how I feel. One is the colors that fly high and proud the red, the white, the blue. The other ones got a rattle snake with a simple statement made, don't tread on me, is what it says and I'll take that to my grave
-Aaron Lewis-

#41 bornhunter04

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 482 posts
  • Joined: 30-April 11

Posted 11 June 2012 - 10:43 AM

View PostDrylok, on 11 June 2012 - 10:39 AM, said:

View PostJason4567, on 11 June 2012 - 10:20 AM, said:

View PostGray Peterson, on 09 June 2012 - 01:29 PM, said:

Term limits in a blue state is very bad. See California.
Care to elaborate?

Ya, I'm curious too

Ummm....yeah, shouldn't it be no term limits = no bueno?
ITWTC #308

#42 Beezil

    Member

  • Supporting Members Team
  • 1,803 posts
  • Joined: 14-March 08

Posted 11 June 2012 - 06:49 PM

View PostGldRush98, on 02 June 2012 - 11:15 PM, said:

Illinois won't get RTC this year, nor any year soon.  The only thing that could possibly happen would be a forced ruling from the SCOTUS, but I don't think that will even give Illinois citizens back their 2A rights.  Guess I'm glad I didn't waste money on an IWB holster that I'll never get to use.

If you say "i can't"

Then, you're right.

#43 Bud

    Member

  • Supporting Members Team
  • 4,498 posts
  • Joined: 06-August 09

Posted 11 June 2012 - 07:32 PM

here's what happens when you term limits in a blue (or a red) state.

Using a blue state like Illinois and you have really long time Republican in as a State rep. Now the district that he represents has changed over the years to being primarily democratic, maybe blue dog democratic, but still, the other party. The long time Republican keeps getting re-elected because even though he is the other party, he does a good job representing the community and he is really popular. But then term limits kick in and suddenly, he's out of office and the district elects a democratic new comer. That democratic new comer votes the party line and a Speaker like Madigan and his subsequent replacements control the State. That's what happened/is happening in California
Bud

Seriously, the legalization of dueling would end political pandering and solve political corruption in the State

ITWT Club Member 001

ONE STATE- ONE LAW

#44 Gray Peterson

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 349 posts
  • Joined: 02-August 04

Posted 11 June 2012 - 08:04 PM

View PostBud, on 11 June 2012 - 07:32 PM, said:

here's what happens when you term limits in a blue (or a red) state.

Using a blue state like Illinois and you have really long time Republican in as a State rep. Now the district that he represents has changed over the years to being primarily democratic, maybe blue dog democratic, but still, the other party. The long time Republican keeps getting re-elected because even though he is the other party, he does a good job representing the community and he is really popular. But then term limits kick in and suddenly, he's out of office and the district elects a democratic new comer. That democratic new comer votes the party line and a Speaker like Madigan and his subsequent replacements control the State. That's what happened/is happening in California

Term limits + blue state = anti gun stuff becoming law every year.

#45 Xwing

    Member

  • Members
  • 4,302 posts
  • Joined: 26-February 09

Posted 12 June 2012 - 01:37 PM

View PostGray Peterson, on 11 June 2012 - 08:04 PM, said:

Term limits + blue state = anti gun stuff becoming law every year.

But isn't that true anyway in a Blue state?  No Term limits + blue state = Mr. Madigan controlling everything in the state, and no pro-gun stuff being allowed out of committee
NRA Lifetime Member
IGOLD 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
CCW Laws:  (Android), (iPhone/iPad)
Posted anti-gun business listing:  (Android), (iPhone/iPad)
Illinois Government: (Android), (iPhone/iPad)

#46 Jason4567

    Member

  • Supporting Members Team
  • 1,049 posts
  • Joined: 19-March 12

Posted 12 June 2012 - 03:31 PM

I don't see wehay everyone assumes a newcomer is going to be anti-2A. What is the reasoning behind that? Plus Bud's scenario could happen the exact opposite way he states (switch dem and republican). I feel that term limits do nothing but limit the power of any one man. After all, why do we do it for the POTUS?

Quote

IS YOUR RIFLE A GRENADE LAUNCHER?   YES NO
From the Chicago Firearm Registration form

#47 w00dc4ip

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 778 posts
  • Joined: 17-July 07

Posted 12 June 2012 - 10:03 PM

You guys are going at this all wrong.  You think Madigan really cares about concealed carry or the people's rights.
Madigan probably isn't holding up the bill because he's against carry.  Maybe he just hasn't figured out how to create a benefit for his legal clients, or how he can personally profit from passing it.
Once he sees the benefit to passing the law, it'll come out of committee.
When my country, into which I had just set my foot, was set on fire about my ears, it was time to stir. It was time for every man to stir. - Thomas Paine

Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. - Benjamin Franklin

Doesn't matter what the press says. Doesn't matter what the politicians or the mobs say. Doesn't matter if the whole country decides that something wrong is something right. This nation was founded on one principle above all else: the requirement that we stand up for what we believe, no matter the odds or the consequences. When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world - "No, you move." - Captain America

#48 Gray Peterson

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 349 posts
  • Joined: 02-August 04

Posted 13 June 2012 - 12:01 AM

View Postw00dc4ip, on 12 June 2012 - 10:03 PM, said:

You guys are going at this all wrong.  You think Madigan really cares about concealed carry or the people's rights.
Madigan probably isn't holding up the bill because he's against carry.  Maybe he just hasn't figured out how to create a benefit for his legal clients, or how he can personally profit from passing it.
Once he sees the benefit to passing the law, it'll come out of committee.

And his legal clients, if you look at his law firm site, has to do with ad valorum taxes.  Nothing at all to do with criminal defense or anything similar.

#49 Sigma

    Member

  • Members
  • 2,145 posts
  • Joined: 13-August 09

Posted 13 June 2012 - 05:12 PM

A MAdigan employee told me to my face that Madigan will never allow concealed carry in Illinois.
Exodus 22:2-3
If the thief is found breaking in, and he is struck so that he dies, there shall be no guilt for his bloodshed.

Gun control is not about guns, it's about control. Once they have all the guns, they'll also have complete control.-Abolt

Guns kill people just like beds get girls pregnant.

#50 Jim Smyth

    Member

  • Supporting Members Team
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 391 posts
  • Joined: 07-May 12

Posted 13 June 2012 - 05:43 PM

Then Madigan needs to go. I hate these career politicians! After a while they think they can do what ever they want. They forget who elects them into office. They should be working for the people of the State and not on there own agenda's, truly sickening. I hope the Supreme court sticks it right up his #SS!

#51 Lou

    Resident Old Guy

  • Members
  • 9,196 posts
  • Joined: 18-May 04

Posted 13 June 2012 - 06:11 PM

View PostSigma, on 13 June 2012 - 05:12 PM, said:

A MAdigan employee told me to my face that Madigan will never allow concealed carry in Illinois.

Just one more reason to get this man out of office.    The 15,000 people who vote him in every election for the last 42 years allow him to rule the 12,000,000 people in Illinois uncontested.
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf. -George Orwell

"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote."-- Benjamin Franklin

#52 Buzzard

    Member

  • Members
  • 8,658 posts
  • Joined: 29-March 07

Posted 13 June 2012 - 07:12 PM

View PostSigma, on 13 June 2012 - 05:12 PM, said:

A MAdigan employee told me to my face that Madigan will never allow concealed carry in Illinois.

Have you shared this information with Todd V.? And when you say a "Madigan employee", are you speaking of someone from his law firm?
"The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes,
but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda,
they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles."  — Jeff Cooper, The Art of the Rifle

#53 Gray Peterson

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 349 posts
  • Joined: 02-August 04

Posted 13 June 2012 - 07:26 PM

View PostSigma, on 13 June 2012 - 05:12 PM, said:

A MAdigan employee told me to my face that Madigan will never allow concealed carry in Illinois.

Richard Daley said the same thing about handgun possession in the home.

#54 sirflyguy

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 773 posts
  • Joined: 28-September 09

Posted 13 June 2012 - 07:44 PM

View PostGray Peterson, on 13 June 2012 - 07:26 PM, said:

View PostSigma, on 13 June 2012 - 05:12 PM, said:

A MAdigan employee told me to my face that Madigan will never allow concealed carry in Illinois.

Richard Daley said the same thing about handgun possession in the home.
First: allow?  The arrogance of Madigan in the face of the what is clear from the Constitution is amazing.
Second: Again, arrogance, but relating to Daley.  How did that end up turning out for him?

#55 TFC

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,143 posts
  • Joined: 28-October 11

Posted 13 June 2012 - 08:37 PM

View Postsirflyguy, on 13 June 2012 - 07:44 PM, said:

View PostGray Peterson, on 13 June 2012 - 07:26 PM, said:

View PostSigma, on 13 June 2012 - 05:12 PM, said:

A MAdigan employee told me to my face that Madigan will never allow concealed carry in Illinois.

Richard Daley said the same thing about handgun possession in the home.
First: allow?  The arrogance of Madigan in the face of the what is clear from the Constitution is amazing.
Second: Again, arrogance, but relating to Daley.  How did that end up turning out for him?

This is the way of the Machine. They dictate to the people, not listen to them.
~If you speak of a gun as a toy, then you see medical waste as playground filler. Yes, it means you're a screwed up individual.~
~"An invasion of mainland America is unwise. Behind every blade of grass a rifle would await us"
-Yamamoto Isoroku
Yes. I'm predicting that Chicago/Cook county will be sold out in order to get "shall issue".

#56 SFC Stu

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 893 posts
  • Joined: 12-April 05

Posted 13 June 2012 - 10:23 PM

View PostSigma, on 13 June 2012 - 05:12 PM, said:

A MAdigan employee told me to my face that Madigan will never allow concealed carry in Illinois.

Madigan is Speaker of the House, not God!

#57 TyGuy

    Member

  • Supporting Members Team
  • 7,208 posts
  • Joined: 10-November 09

Posted 13 June 2012 - 10:35 PM

Is there no way for the legislature itself to bring up a bill?  I mean, if Madian wants to stonewall them, but a majority wants to vote on the bill can they not somehow bring it up?
Meh

#58 bob

    Member

  • Members
  • 3,166 posts
  • Joined: 14-November 05

Posted 14 June 2012 - 04:58 AM

View PostTyGuy, on 13 June 2012 - 10:35 PM, said:

Is there no way for the legislature itself to bring up a bill?  I mean, if Madian wants to stonewall them, but a majority wants to vote on the bill can they not somehow bring it up?
IIRC, the house rules would require a 2/3 vote to change a speaker's ruling. In any case, if there is not a 3/5 vote in both the house and senate, it is probably not worth bringing it up and losing.
bob

Disclaimers: I am not a lawyer, cop, soldier, gunsmith, politician, plumber, electrician, or a professional practitioner of many of the other things I comment on in this forum.

http://ilbob.blogspot.com/

#59 Xwing

    Member

  • Members
  • 4,302 posts
  • Joined: 26-February 09

Posted 26 June 2012 - 06:51 AM

View Postbob, on 14 June 2012 - 04:58 AM, said:

View PostTyGuy, on 13 June 2012 - 10:35 PM, said:

Is there no way for the legislature itself to bring up a bill?  I mean, if Madian wants to stonewall them, but a majority wants to vote on the bill can they not somehow bring it up?
IIRC, the house rules would require a 2/3 vote to change a speaker's ruling. In any case, if there is not a 3/5 vote in both the house and senate, it is probably not worth bringing it up and losing.

It takes 3/5.  Same as it takes to pass a bill over homerule.  And with the fact the Dems rule the Il Legislature, it is almost impossible to get 3/5 to cross Madigan.  He has total control.
NRA Lifetime Member
IGOLD 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
CCW Laws:  (Android), (iPhone/iPad)
Posted anti-gun business listing:  (Android), (iPhone/iPad)
Illinois Government: (Android), (iPhone/iPad)




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users