Shepard update 4/13
#1
Posted 13 April 2012 - 01:28 PM
Good news all the way around
Now back to my regularlly scheduled vacation. . .
#2
Posted 13 April 2012 - 01:29 PM
Example of Combat Logic:
Marine #1-"You can't just add zeros to the end of a 6 digit grid to make a 10 digit...."
Marine #2-"Sure you can, the GPS accepted it and now we are on our way!"
#3
Posted 13 April 2012 - 01:33 PM
Tvandermyde, on 13 April 2012 - 01:28 PM, said:
Good news all the way around
Now back to my regularlly scheduled vacation. . .
I have no idea what this means, but nice to see a little good news for a change...
#4
Posted 13 April 2012 - 01:58 PM
scough, on 13 April 2012 - 01:33 PM, said:
Why does combining the cases help? Anyone, anyone? Bueller?
ISRA Member
GOA Member
All around great guy
Original HB997 or FOID carry. No more compromise.
#5
Posted 13 April 2012 - 02:04 PM
#6
Posted 13 April 2012 - 02:08 PM
Combining the cases means they will be heard together with devided time at orals more than likely
It also means that despite the lateness of our ruling we are not behind Moore we are starting at the appellate level at the same time neither case is in front of the other. A ruling on either will be a ruling for both and we are closer to SCOTUS no matter who looses there will be an appeal unless we were to win the appeal and the AG decided not to fight it any longer
#7
Posted 13 April 2012 - 02:13 PM
ISRA Member
GOA Member
All around great guy
Original HB997 or FOID carry. No more compromise.
#9
Posted 13 April 2012 - 02:18 PM
ISRA Member
GOA Member
All around great guy
Original HB997 or FOID carry. No more compromise.
#10
Posted 13 April 2012 - 02:20 PM
ISRA Member
GOA Member
All around great guy
Original HB997 or FOID carry. No more compromise.
#11
Posted 13 April 2012 - 02:38 PM
I'm not saying that it's not the RIGHT call. I'm saying that I don't understand the law so I don't know why this is a good or bad thing. It's a question out of ignorance not out of debate.
ISRA Member
GOA Member
All around great guy
Original HB997 or FOID carry. No more compromise.
#12
Posted 13 April 2012 - 03:06 PM
TyGuy, on 13 April 2012 - 02:18 PM, said:
#13
Posted 13 April 2012 - 04:00 PM
Tvandermyde, on 13 April 2012 - 02:08 PM, said:
And the question that shall eventually end up at the Supreme Court is this:
Does "the right of the people to keep and bear arms", as stated in the constitution, mean that "the people have the right to bear arms?" Remember ... the "keep" part of the guarantee has now (finally) been affirmed. Next up is affirmation of the "bear" part of the guarantee. Heller made it clear that the second amendment protects two rights ... the right to keep, and the right to bear, arms.
Lewis Carroll, 1872
#14
Posted 13 April 2012 - 04:09 PM
As to why this is good, some feel that Mary Shepard is a better platiff with a better set of facts. More sympathetic in the eyes of the court
#15
Posted 13 April 2012 - 04:10 PM
GarandFan, on 13 April 2012 - 04:00 PM, said:
Tvandermyde, on 13 April 2012 - 02:08 PM, said:
And the question that shall eventually end up at the Supreme Court is this:
Does "the right of the people to keep and bear arms", as stated in the constitution, mean that "the people have the right to bear arms?" Remember ... the "keep" part of the guarantee has now (finally) been affirmed. Next up is affirmation of the "bear" part of the guarantee. Heller made it clear that the second amendment protects two rights ... the right to keep, and the right to bear, arms.
#16
Posted 13 April 2012 - 05:41 PM
ISRA Member
GOA Member
All around great guy
Original HB997 or FOID carry. No more compromise.
#17
Posted 13 April 2012 - 06:23 PM
You must realize a lot can hang on this. If the 7th reaches out to remove a complete ban on the public carry arms, similar to North Carolina, Maryland and couple other cases last month there is the potential real explosive decompression of the Chicago Machine's bubbles and power..... Almost makes you drool to dream about that... However coming back to reality we will just have to wait and see what transpires....... Some real possibilities though...
Regards, Drd
Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual.
--Thomas Jefferson to I. Tiffany, 1819
#18
Posted 13 April 2012 - 06:31 PM
dmefford, on 13 April 2012 - 06:23 PM, said:
You must realize a lot can hang on this. If the 7th reaches out to remove a complete ban on the public carry arms, similar to North Carolina, Maryland and couple other cases last month there is the potential real explosive decompression of the Chicago Machine's bubbles and power..... Almost makes you drool to dream about that... However coming back to reality we will just have to wait and see what transpires....... Some real possibilities though...
Regards, Drd
Can you picture it now? A hot summer day on the magnificent mile, open-carrying your choice of revolver or auto and the criminal aldermen having nothing to do about it?
#19
Posted 13 April 2012 - 07:02 PM
The penultimate goal is a persuasive Circuit Split for SCOTUS.
Pax River, MD
#20
Posted 13 April 2012 - 07:11 PM
WOO
I am sitting here reading and practicing mag changes on my AR while my lady is getting ready to go out.
#21
Posted 13 April 2012 - 07:40 PM
Hopefully they can bury the hatchet.
#22
Posted 13 April 2012 - 07:57 PM
Meaning.... how long before the case is heard?
How long before we have a ruling?
How does this proceed from here?
If we lose at the 7th Circuit level, I know we would appeal, so long as the current SCOTUS remained.
If Chicago/Illinois loses do you think they would push it to SCOTUS or just let it go, since Illinois is the only state with this problem?
#23
Posted 13 April 2012 - 08:00 PM
ISRA Member
GOA Member
All around great guy
Original HB997 or FOID carry. No more compromise.
#24
Posted 13 April 2012 - 08:50 PM
#25
Posted 13 April 2012 - 09:18 PM
#26
Posted 13 April 2012 - 09:20 PM
Will know more monday
#27
Posted 14 April 2012 - 06:11 AM
If the thief is found breaking in, and he is struck so that he dies, there shall be no guilt for his bloodshed.
Gun control is not about guns, it's about control. Once they have all the guns, they'll also have complete control.-Abolt
Guns kill people just like beds get girls pregnant.
#28
Posted 14 April 2012 - 06:23 AM
Quote
http://www.mdshooter...?t=57917&page=5
12-Sheppard Opening Brief.pdf 1.06MB
182 downloads
In Todd We Trust!
"How a politician stands on the Second Amendment tells you how he or she views you as an individual...as a trustworthy and productive citizen, or as part of an unruly crowd that needs to be lorded over, controlled, supervised, and taken care of." - Dr. Suzanne Gratia Hupp, Killeen Texas Luby's massacre survivor
"Arms in the hands of citizens may be used at individual discretion... in private self-defense." - John Adams
"Taking my gun away because I might shoot someone is like cutting my tongue out because I might yell 'Fire!' in a crowded theater." - Peter Venetoklis
#29
Posted 14 April 2012 - 06:53 AM
TyGuy, on 13 April 2012 - 05:41 PM, said:
You're kidding of course. But for those in total seclusion without internet, radio, tv, newspaper or contact with individuals in the outside world, this November is the presidential election. The president nominates supreme court judges to fill vacancies that occur.
Remember the 1991 Luby Cafeteria Massacre of the Unarmed (Kileen, Texas before Texas Concealed Carry) Do we need 23 people to die in a similar incident before we're allowed effective self defense?
Three school masacres have been stopped by civilians with firearms. Two with handguns and the third by a guy with a shotgun. (Pearl, Ms; Appalacian School of Law; Edinboro,Pa)
#30
Posted 14 April 2012 - 08:53 AM
ISRA Member
GOA Member
All around great guy
Original HB997 or FOID carry. No more compromise.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











