Javascript Disabled Detected

You currently have javascript disabled. Several functions may not work. Please re-enable javascript to access full functionality.

8

Wilson decision -- remand on 2-615 motion

Started by Tvandermyde , Apr 05 2012 08:10 AM

«
Prev

Please log in to reply

90 replies to this topic

#91 borgranta

Member

Members
739 posts

Joined:

29-June 12

Posted 01 July 2012 - 09:34 PM

Uncle Harley, on 05 April 2012 - 09:31 PM, said:

Davey, on 05 April 2012 - 08:57 PM, said:

Tvandermyde, on 05 April 2012 - 07:10 PM, said:

[size="3"][font="Calibri"]The Court already tossed out rational basis. So now we will fight over the standard of review. We will fight over "in common use", "dangerous or unusual" as well has a host of other things.]

How do we prove in common use? Can we not just do some market research and come up with the number of semi auto AKs and ar15s that have been sold or shipped? I'm sure its well into the millions. How about showing the court three gun competitions and such? How much more sporting can one get than that?

almost every Walmart that sells firearms, carries AR's...............Doesn't get much more common than walmart does it????

The 2nd amendment was intended not only for protecting against tyranny but also enforcing and protecting the rule of law and the sovereignty of the states and the country as a whole which could include repelling invasions. If the citizens were not disarmed in New Orleans after Katrina than the lawlessnes would have been either reduced or eliminated.