Email to my Rep
#-29
Posted 14 March 2012 - 02:43 PM
Dear Congressman,
I recently suffered a back injury which, for the time being, has dramatically limited my mobility and my ability to walk at a normal pace. At times, I have to use a cane for support when standing.
Until this injury, I felt reasonably comfortable that I would not be looked at as a "soft target" by those who would be inclined to rob or attack someone. I was confident that, if needed, I could at least put up a good fight.
However, now things are different. With my slow gait, cane in hand and deliberate movements, I am obviously a target for would-be thugs or thieves.
Since you voted "No" on HB-0148, the Family and Personal Protection Act, I would like you to please explain to me how I can defend myself, my wife or my daughters in my current condition.
Or, is it your position that I simply submit to those attackers and hope that a police officer happens to be driving by at the exact moment I am being beaten or my wife or daughters are being raped and can thwart such an attack?
I would truley like to hear your response.
If I get a response, I will post it here (after I get over my shock, of course!)
#-28
Posted 14 March 2012 - 03:06 PM
Only criminals are safe in 'Gun Free Zones'
#-27
Posted 14 March 2012 - 03:25 PM
Some folks at the meeting were supposed to follow up with him, but I'm not sure you can convince him to change his mind. That's the warm fuzzy feeling I got from him.
#-26
Posted 14 March 2012 - 03:59 PM
Smittyp83, on 14 March 2012 - 02:43 PM, said:
Great email. Let us know if he responds. But most likely, you'll just go on his "ignore" list, because he cannot come up with any rational response to that email, other than saying "I've changed my mind.
IGOLD 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
CCW Laws: (Android), (iPhone/iPad)
Posted anti-gun business listing: (Android), (iPhone/iPad)
Illinois Government: (Android), (iPhone/iPad)
#-25
Posted 14 March 2012 - 06:28 PM

Yes, I really look like this.
#-24
Posted 14 March 2012 - 06:31 PM
section 8 housing, Medicaid, 100 weeks of unemployment checks, a 40-ounce
malt liquor, needles, drugs, contraceptives, and designer Air Jordan
shoes… and he will vote Democrat for a lifetime.”
#-23
Posted 15 March 2012 - 08:40 AM
Sorry I did not get a chance to meet with you. Had you made an appointment, we would have had a chance to talk. My challenges with conceal and carry are not typical and those that lobby on your behalf have yet to answer my questions. Also, let me correct you. I do not have a security detail. Thank you for your email.
Will Davis
here is the response I got from Will Davis after 12 emails. One a day.
#-22
Posted 15 March 2012 - 08:48 AM
boomersand, on 15 March 2012 - 08:40 AM, said:
Sorry I did not get a chance to meet with you. Had you made an appointment, we would have had a chance to talk. My challenges with conceal and carry are not typical and those that lobby on your behalf have yet to answer my questions. Also, let me correct you. I do not have a security detail. Thank you for your email.
Will Davis
here is the response I got from Will Davis after 12 emails. One a day.
YOUR WALLET, the only place Democrats care to drill
#-21
Posted 15 March 2012 - 08:53 AM
Sent from my tactical multicam SCH-I500.
Edited by NakPPI, 15 March 2012 - 08:54 AM.
#-20
Posted 15 March 2012 - 08:54 AM
#-19
Posted 15 March 2012 - 08:55 AM
boomersand, on 15 March 2012 - 08:54 AM, said:
YOUR WALLET, the only place Democrats care to drill
#-18
Posted 15 March 2012 - 09:06 AM
#-17
Posted 15 March 2012 - 09:20 AM
#-16
Posted 15 March 2012 - 10:07 AM
#-15
Posted 15 March 2012 - 10:31 AM
willxjcherokee, on 15 March 2012 - 10:07 AM, said:
YOUR WALLET, the only place Democrats care to drill
#-14
Posted 15 March 2012 - 02:48 PM
Paul Kirsey, on 14 March 2012 - 06:31 PM, said:
Up until about two weeks ago, our offices were in the same building, one floor apart. I've gone in there many times and have even cornered him in the elevator to talk about it. It never seems to make a difference.
Edited by Smittyp83, 15 March 2012 - 02:55 PM.
#-13
Posted 15 March 2012 - 02:55 PM
I'll bet you can guess where it went from there. Standard canned response letter. In fact, I think I got the same letter when I contacted him about supporting 148 last year.
Of course, he didn't answer my question (since it was a form letter) but he did say that he supported keeping FOID info private.
#-12
Posted 15 March 2012 - 03:13 PM
Smittyp83, on 15 March 2012 - 02:55 PM, said:
I'll bet you can guess where it went from there. Standard canned response letter. In fact, I think I got the same letter when I contacted him about supporting 148 last year.
Of course, he didn't answer my question (since it was a form letter) but he did say that he supported keeping FOID info private.
Here is the audio of an interview that WD had on 03/02/12 on WGN radio. Listen to it and hear his rationale for the registration bill is all about. I will reserve comment until later.
http://www.wgnradio....5917064.mp3file
Edited by Thanks2macdonald, 15 March 2012 - 03:14 PM.











