Posted 08 August 2011 - 07:10 AM
Lou, on 06 August 2011 - 06:26 AM, said:
I love this part:
The City objected to the presence of the rifles and the City witnesses declined to examine the subject rifles. City's objection was overruled.
The City witness, Officer Biggins, contends that the subject rifles have the capability of accepting a detachable magazine with a flick of a sharp object or a bullet without structural changes to the weapon. Officer Biggins testified that "the process" does not allow him to demonstrate this potential alteration to the subject weapons.
Yep, it's Real easy to do.....he just doesn't know how to do it.
Congrats on the win FF.
This ruling is HUGE
and goes way beyond just a few SKS's since it basically allows anything to become registrable in it's original unmodified form.
let SCC know what happened with the hearing, i'm sure they will have some good fun with the city attorneys and Chicago cops that were involved with this.....
"The Obama administration: Erasing the line between satire and reality since January 20, 2009″
When the 2006 losses first happened, I heard a lot of GOPers say, "Good! A couple of terms of Democrats in power, and they'll overreach! Then we can pick up the pieces." I thought that's stupid; it's like burning down the house so you can remodel with the insurance money. Well, willy-nilly, the structure's definitely ablaze, a 5-alarm barnburner. Those GOPers who wanted total destruction have almost got what they want. I for one just hope we still have something to repair and rebuild once the flames are out. Six years of democratic centralism is an ugly thing to contemplate.
Richard L. Kent, Esq.
How much more Illegal than Illegal can we make it to murder someone with an Illegally possessed anything?