Jump to content


SB0259 SPORT SHOOTING RANGE ACT


  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

#1 45superman

    Member

  • Senior Member
  • 9,128 posts
  • Joined: 04-May 04

Posted 05 February 2009 - 02:57 PM

Synopsis As Introduced
Creates the Sport Shooting and Training Range Act. Contains legislative findings and intent. Provides that the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency shall make a good faith effort to provide U. S. Environmental Protection Agency publications to owners or operators of sport shooting or training ranges and provide environmental practices assistance. Provides for environmental stewardship plans at ranges and for Illinois EPA assistance with contamination. Sets forth procedures regarding contamination investigations and corrective actions. Provides for immunity from legal actions brought by the State, local governments, persons, or non-governmental entities based upon projectiles on the range or in the environment, if an operator made a good faith effort to comply with the Environmental Protection Act. Provides for withdrawal of claims by the State and local governments against ranges pending in a State court or administrative agency. Provides for criminal penalties when a State or local governmental employee while officially acting maliciously violates the Act. Provides that no municipality or county shall zone or rezone any property that includes a range if the zoning or rezoning would cause the range to be eliminated or to cease operation, unless the owner petitions for or consents to the zoning or rezoning. Contains provisions regarding: costs; preemption; conflicting laws; construction; and other matters. Amends the Environmental Protection Act to conform to the new Act.

http://ilga.gov/legi...p...ID=76&GA=96
My gun rights blog
St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner
NRA, ISRA, CCRKBA, SAF, GOA and JPFO Life Member

#2 Buzzard

    Member

  • Members
  • 8,646 posts
  • Joined: 29-March 07

Posted 05 February 2009 - 03:23 PM

And why is a shooting range an environmental issue? Lead comes from the ground naturally!
"The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes,
but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda,
they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles."  — Jeff Cooper, The Art of the Rifle

#3 45superman

    Member

  • Senior Member
  • 9,128 posts
  • Joined: 04-May 04

Posted 05 February 2009 - 03:28 PM

View PostBuzzard, on Feb 5 2009, 03:23 PM, said:

And why is a shooting range an environmental issue? Lead comes from the ground naturally!

I hear you, Buzz, but that's going to be one of the backdoor attacks on gun owners--and it looks as if Sen. Clayborne is trying to help us out.
My gun rights blog
St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner
NRA, ISRA, CCRKBA, SAF, GOA and JPFO Life Member

#4 Lion of Lincoln

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 202 posts
  • Joined: 20-March 08

Posted 05 February 2009 - 04:39 PM

View PostBuzzard, on Feb 5 2009, 03:23 PM, said:

Lead comes from the ground naturally!

It does, but it doesn't typically occur in nature as a metallic element.

http://en.wikipedia....Lead#Occurrence

#5 Lion of Lincoln

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 202 posts
  • Joined: 20-March 08

Posted 05 February 2009 - 04:46 PM

View PostBuzzard, on Feb 5 2009, 03:23 PM, said:

And why is a shooting range an environmental issue?


It DOES have the potential to be an environmental hazard.  But gun-haters are trying to overstate the risk in order to further their agenda.  Any little thing they think will remove guns from the people they'll run with.  And when that aspect of their agenda is proven fraudulent, the go on to the next one and pretend like the previous one never existed.  Fad politics.

#6 Buzzard

    Member

  • Members
  • 8,646 posts
  • Joined: 29-March 07

Posted 05 February 2009 - 05:09 PM

View PostLion of Lincoln, on Feb 5 2009, 05:46 PM, said:

View PostBuzzard, on Feb 5 2009, 03:23 PM, said:

And why is a shooting range an environmental issue?


It DOES have the potential to be an environmental hazard.  But gun-haters are trying to overstate the risk in order to further their agenda.  Any little thing they think will remove guns from the people they'll run with.  And when that aspect of their agenda is proven fraudulent, the go on to the next one and pretend like the previous one never existed.  Fad politics.
I guess we will have to classify all Civil War battlefield states as being hazzardous to your health. Stupid Liberals.
"The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes,
but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda,
they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles."  — Jeff Cooper, The Art of the Rifle

#7 Lion of Lincoln

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 202 posts
  • Joined: 20-March 08

Posted 05 February 2009 - 07:13 PM

View PostBuzzard, on Feb 5 2009, 05:09 PM, said:

View PostLion of Lincoln, on Feb 5 2009, 05:46 PM, said:

View PostBuzzard, on Feb 5 2009, 03:23 PM, said:

And why is a shooting range an environmental issue?


It DOES have the potential to be an environmental hazard.  But gun-haters are trying to overstate the risk in order to further their agenda.  Any little thing they think will remove guns from the people they'll run with.  And when that aspect of their agenda is proven fraudulent, the go on to the next one and pretend like the previous one never existed.  Fad politics.
I guess we will have to classify all Civil War battlefield states as being hazzardous to your health. Stupid Liberals.

It's like when all the leftists were up-in-arms about depleted uranium being used on the battlefield and they tried to connect every single miscarriage, deformity, or death before old age to depleted uranium in Iraq.  The problem is whatever danger exists due to depleted uranium isn't because its radioactive, but because it is a heavy metal.  And in order for depleted uranium to cause problems, it has to be ingested via inhalation or ingestion.  And there's virtually no risk of that happening.  

Unless you're breathing lead paint dust, eating lead paint chips or drinking/eating from lead contaminated kitchenware, you're risk is very low.  Especially if you're an adult.

#8 c-rock

    c-rock

  • Banned
  • 5,522 posts
  • Joined: 06-July 04

Posted 05 February 2009 - 07:22 PM

I thought lead bullets in the ground, over time will seal itself from leaching. Lead in other forms is the most dangerous.  If its in a liquid state mixed with other chemicals, that is supposed to be the worse.
John 3:16

"For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son,[a] that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.

#9 Lou

    Resident Old Guy

  • Members
  • 9,171 posts
  • Joined: 18-May 04

Posted 05 February 2009 - 07:25 PM

[quote name='Lion of Lincoln' post='138370' date='Feb 5 2009, 07:13 PM'][quote name='Buzzard' post='138356' date='Feb 5 2009, 05:09 PM'][quote name='Lion of Lincoln' post='138353' date='Feb 5 2009, 05:46 PM'][quote name='Buzzard' post='138335' date='Feb 5 2009, 03:23 PM']And why is a shooting range an environmental issue?[/quote]


It DOES have the potential to be an environmental hazard.  But gun-haters are trying to overstate the risk in order to further their agenda.  Any little thing they think will remove guns from the people they'll run with.  And when that aspect of their agenda is proven fraudulent, the go on to the next one and pretend like the previous one never existed.  Fad politics.
[/quote]
I guess we will have to classify all Civil War battlefield states as being hazzardous to your health. Stupid Liberals.
[/quote]

It's like when all the leftists were up-in-arms about depleted uranium being used on the battlefield and they tried to connect every single miscarriage, deformity, or death before old age to depleted uranium in Iraq.  The problem is whatever danger exists due to depleted uranium isn't because its radioactive, but because it is a heavy metal.  And in order for depleted uranium to cause problems, it has to be ingested via inhalation or ingestion.  And there's virtually no risk of that happening.  

Unless you're breathing lead paint dust, eating lead paint chips or drinking/eating from lead contaminated kitchenware, you're risk is very low.  Especially if you're an adult.
[/quote]
See - you guys just don't understand.
Environmentalist wackos do not have to use logic and common sense.
It's all about "saving the planet for our children."
Sheesh.......................
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf. -George Orwell

"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote."-- Benjamin Franklin

#10 rubble

    Member

  • Supporting Members Team
  • PipPip
  • 128 posts
  • Joined: 15-February 08

Posted 06 February 2009 - 07:24 PM

I don't think the environment has anything to do with it.  Its just an angle for anti-gunners to use to close shooting ranges.  The government has unlimited resources, (due to the general apathy of the citizenry for decades), and getting the EPA engaged in closing ranges is an effective move for the libs.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users