Municipalities that Prohibit and Regulate Firearms
#1
Posted 10 August 2004 - 08:54 PM
Good info if you are traveling to these counties.
Read text here Researched by member 44Brent
http://www.isp.state.../ordinances.cfm
-Mark Twain
Sometimes ya gotta cause a little fruckus.
-Colleen Lawson
Certified NRA Pistol Instructor
NRA Range Safety Officer
Life Member- ISRA
Member- NRA
#2
Posted 12 August 2005 - 12:33 PM
...Chinese proverb
#4
Posted 10 May 2008 - 09:15 AM
Illinoiscarry Document Repository
Thanks to everyone who has contributed! Lets keep em coming!
#5
Posted 10 May 2008 - 10:50 AM
Slappy, on May 10 2008, 10:15 AM, said:
Remember the 1991 Luby Cafeteria Massacre of the Unarmed (Kileen, Texas before Texas Concealed Carry) Do we need 23 people to die in a similar incident before we're allowed effective self defense?
Three school masacres have been stopped by civilians with firearms. Two with handguns and the third by a guy with a shotgun. (Pearl, Ms; Appalacian School of Law; Edinboro,Pa)
#6
Posted 21 April 2009 - 11:02 AM
#7
Posted 21 April 2009 - 11:28 AM
Quote
They did pass the Pro 2nd Amendment Resolution.
http://www.pro2areso...n.com/id12.html
#8
Posted 21 April 2009 - 11:33 AM
#9
Posted 21 April 2009 - 11:40 AM
EAGLE, on Apr 21 2009, 12:02 PM, said:
Eagle, Welcome to the forum.
Williamson county hasn't had a resolution on the ballot, I don't believe, so that isn't available to gauge support. The Pro-2A resolution did pass in Williamson County, not sure of the vote by the county board. You have John Bradley as a Illinois rep and he is pro-LTC, having sponsored bills a number of times. You might want to check if your sheriff was at that Illinois Sheriff's Association meeting that passed the resolution supporting LTC. Since it was a unanimous vote if he was there he either didn't vote or supported it.
Remember the 1991 Luby Cafeteria Massacre of the Unarmed (Kileen, Texas before Texas Concealed Carry) Do we need 23 people to die in a similar incident before we're allowed effective self defense?
Three school masacres have been stopped by civilians with firearms. Two with handguns and the third by a guy with a shotgun. (Pearl, Ms; Appalacian School of Law; Edinboro,Pa)
#10
Posted 21 April 2009 - 05:14 PM
Quote
The resolution is not a law, it's sending a strong message to legislators in Illinois that the supporting counties, Illinois gun owners and supporters have had enough of the anti-gun legislation in Illinois.
The Resolution
Quote
WHEREAS, the Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms is guaranteed as an Individual Right under the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution and under the Constitution of the State of Illinois, and;
WHEREAS, the Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms for defense of Life, Liberty, and Property is regarded as an Inalienable Right by the People of _______________ County, Illinois, and:
WHEREAS, the People of _________________ County, Illinois, derive economic benefit from all safe forms of firearms recreation, hunting, and shooting conducted within __________ County using all types of firearms allowable under the United States Constitution and the Constitution of the State of Illinois, and;
WHEREAS, ____________ County Board, being elected to represent the People of _____________County and being duly sworn by their Oath of Office to uphold the United States Constitution and the Constitution of the State of Illinois, and;
WHEREAS, the Illinois House of Representatives and the Illinois Senate, being elected by the People of the State of Illinois and being duly sworn by their Oath of Office to uphold the United States Constitution and the Constitution of the State of Illinois, and;
WHEREAS, proposed legislation under consideration by the Illinois State Legislature would infringe the Right to Keep and Bear Arms and would ban the possession and use of firearms now employed by individual citizens of _______________ County, Illinois, for defense of Life, Liberty and Property and would ban the possession and use of firearms now employed for safe forms of firearms recreation, hunting and shooting conducted within ____________ County, Illinois;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT BE AND IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the People of _____________ County, Illinois, do hereby oppose the enactment of any legislation that would infringe upon the Right of the People to keep and bear arms and consider such laws to be unconstitutional and beyond lawful Legislative Authority!
__________________________
Chairman
Attest:
____________________________
County Clerk
#11
Posted 24 May 2009 - 03:01 AM
EAGLE, on Apr 21 2009, 12:33 PM, said:
Be aware that Marion Mayor Bob Butler doesn't think that citizens should be allowed to carry handguns. Marion police chief Goolsby thinks that only police should be able to carry guns.
I can't find anywhere that Cundiff has said anything about the issue one way or the other.
#12
Posted 27 August 2009 - 11:43 PM
Yay guns!!! boooo anti-gunners!
#13
Posted 28 August 2009 - 10:23 AM
41.01 which relates to fees
Chapter 115 - which relates to Child care facilities
Chapter 128 - which relates to firearms dealers
Chapter 136 - which relates to all persons dealing at retail of firearms
So as I read it, Schaumburg has no registration for residents. But since Schaumburg does have firearms ordnances on the books and is a home rule community does that mean that Schaumburg does not fall under the Cook County bans?
"That rifle on the wall of the laborer's cottage or working class flat is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there."
-- George Orwell
#14
Posted 02 May 2011 - 09:30 AM
#15
Posted 02 May 2011 - 10:54 AM
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk
#16
Posted 02 May 2011 - 11:24 AM
Edit: found it on Muni codes thanks adam!
Here it is can someone tell me if fanny pack carry would be legal or is it still considered "transportation"
9.76.010 - Deemed guilty when.
Any person who carries a concealed revolver, pistol or other weapon on or about his person, or a razor as a weapon, or who, in a threatening or boisterous manner, displays or flourishes any deadly weapon, is guilty of carrying concealed weapons.
#17
Posted 02 May 2011 - 02:56 PM
Slappy, on 10 May 2008 - 09:15 AM, said:
I believe if you are not on the list, or if your municipality does not have a law, it defaults to county law.
So if you live in Cook County and your city does not have a home rule, then you are subject to Cook County rule.
#18
Posted 15 August 2012 - 03:00 AM
Edited by Rail, 15 August 2012 - 03:00 AM.
#19
Posted 04 January 2013 - 08:26 PM
Edited by LYU370, 04 January 2013 - 08:31 PM.
#20
Posted 06 January 2013 - 02:54 PM
The Village of Justice
http://www.villageofjustice.org/
Codes-
http://www.amlegal.c...egal:justice_il
Looks like my village is home rule.
WEAPON CONTROL
Sec. 3-600. General Provisions:
(a) Title: This article shall be known as the JUSTICE FIREARMS AND [/url]ASSAULT weapons. As provided in article VII, section 6© of the State Constitution of 1970, if a county ordinance conflicts with an ordinance of a municipality, the municipal ordinance shall prevail within its jurisdiction.
(2) It is specifically intended that this article shall preempt the Cook County Firearms Dealer’s License and Assault Sec. 3-602. [/url]Assault Assault Weapon: Any weapon into a machine gun, any combination of parts from which a machine gun can be assembled if such parts are in the possession or under the control of a person.
(2) Assault Ammunition: A detachable magazine capacity of which is more than sixteen (16) rounds center fire.
( :cool: assault weapon or weapon or assault ammunition to any officer, agent or employee of the village or any other municipality, county, body, politic or state, or of the United States, members of the armed forces of the United States; or the organized militia of this or any other state, and peace officers to the extent that any such person is otherwise authorized to acquire or possess an assault ammunition and is acting within the scope of his or her duties;
b. The possession for sale and distribution or the sale to, or the acquisition or possession of assault ammunition by persons employed to provide security for armored carriers or mobile check cashing services while in the course of such duties, while commuting directly to or from the person's place of employment, and while at the person's home, if the assault weapons if such weapon or assault ammunition possessed, sold or transferred in violation of subsection ( :cool:(1) of this section is hereby declared to be contraband and shall be seized and disposed of in accordance with as provided in subsection ( :cool:(4)c of this section.
(3) Any person found in violation of this section shall be fined not less than two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00) per day and not more than five hundred dollars ($500.00) per day, or both.
(4) Any person who, prior to the effective date hereof, was legally in possession of an assault ammunition prohibited by this section, shall have fourteen (14) days from the effective date hereof to do any of the following without being subject to prosecution hereunder:
a. To remove the assault weapon either to render it permanently inoperable or to permanently make it a device no longer defined as an assault Weapons Confiscated:
(1) Whenever any firearm or ammunition is surrendered or confiscated pursuant to the terms of this article, the chief of police shall ascertain whether such firearm or ammunition is needed as evidence in any matter.
(2) If such firearm or ammunition is not required for evidence, it shall be destroyed at the direction of the chief of police. A record of the date and method of destruction and inventory of the firearm or ammunition so destroyed shall be maintained.
(Ord. 94-29, § 3, 12-27-1994)
(Ord. 94-29, § 3, 12-27-1994)
The funny thing the Assault Weapon terminology is spot on and applies to select fire/automatic firearms. It is much more lenient than cook county's ban by a long shot. I talked to many police officer's and the magazine ban isn't enforced. It's basically there if you are causing trouble with a firearm they have an extra charge to stick to you.
Police discretion is a wonderful thing.
Edited by Capt_Destro, 06 January 2013 - 02:58 PM.
"…Hence also do I advocate training in arms for those who believe in the method of violence. I would rather have India resort to arms in order to defend her honor than that she should in a cowardly manner become or remain a helpless witness to her own dishonor."
"…He who cannot protect himself or his nearest and dearest or their honour by non-violently facing death may and ought to do so by violently dealing with the oppressor. He who can do neither of the two is a burden. He has no business to be the head of a family. He must either hide himself, or must rest content to live for ever in helplessness and be prepared to crawl like a worm at the bidding of a bully …
[When violence] is offered in self-defence or for the defence of the defenceless, it is an act of bravery far better than cowardly submission."
~Gandhi~
#21
Posted 18 January 2013 - 03:51 PM
But it seems like an unreasonable burden to have a patchwork of different transport rules as you drive through different towns. There is no mechanism for giving instantaneous warnings, like with speed limit signs, and many communities do not even report their statues to the ISP for publication. And, what is your remedy if what you have in your trunk does not meet the statute? The arrest in South Elgin comes to mind. I believe Highland Park also has some "unique" transport laws.
This just seems like an abuse of Home Rule. Can Home Rule communities just do whatever the hell the want on any issue?
#22
Posted 18 January 2013 - 05:16 PM
When I travel to the FBI Range in North Chicago I am traveling with a full kit. Mind you that means I'm carrying a 13 30 rnd Mags, and 4 15 rnd Pistol mags.
As I transverse Cook county and the little towns and villages along the I-90, Hwy 53, Lake Cook Road, and I-94 I am breaking LAW, after LAW, after LAW times the number of banned items that I am carrying, which includes at least 1 AR-15 sometimes 2, or an additional weapon that they consider an assault weapon.
Plus the rounds for each weapon.
I would never let them search my trunk willingly, and I give them no probable cause. However if I have a car accident, all bets are off.
If I were to be discovered, I have no doubt that I would be arrested & charged in many of these municipalities, regardless that I was heading to help a Federal LE Agency.
PS. Counting on an individual Officer's discretion is about as a safe of bet as counting on our current President to make a good decision for our Country...
Remax Property Source
Rockford, IL. 61114
815-227-9000
#23
Posted 18 January 2013 - 07:24 PM
Does travel on state roadways vs. city streets help with your specific commute?
Edited by RECarry, 18 January 2013 - 07:24 PM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











