New Winnebago county Concealed Carry thread
#61
Posted 05 June 2008 - 12:50 PM
I just wanted to let you all know I'm still around, I just got really busy and I'm leaving for 2 weeks of vacation Saturday. So unfortunately I won't be able to have my voice heard at the next meeting. Keep up the good fight, and I'll touch base when I return.
PS.
I LOVE that commercial. Very tasteful and to the point. What credentials does an organization need to put their name on it? Do they have to be a registered non-profit or political group? Would "Paid for by IllinoisCarry.com" qualify?
#62
Posted 05 June 2008 - 12:54 PM
It was good meeting you on tuesday. I was the big guy in the blue shirt with long hair.
I will you on Tuesday and will hopefully be bringing some reinforcements myself! We're going to get this passed, I know it!
Illinoiscarry Document Repository
Thanks to everyone who has contributed! Lets keep em coming!
#63
Posted 05 June 2008 - 01:35 PM
Board9, on Jun 5 2008, 08:26 AM, said:
cberan, on Jun 5 2008, 08:19 AM, said:
Board9, on Jun 5 2008, 07:35 AM, said:
Like I said, I will be showing up to the meeting with a car load full of people.
Thank you so much for your encouraging words, with your permission, I would like to use your statement in my up coming campaign to retain my seat. Your county board should take the same resolution to the floor and do the same thing. Once that happens then another will do it and so on...the effect will make those in Springfield take notice.
#64
Posted 05 June 2008 - 05:47 PM
Slappy, on Jun 5 2008, 01:54 PM, said:
It was good meeting you on tuesday. I was the big guy in the blue shirt with long hair.
I will you on Tuesday and will hopefully be bringing some reinforcements myself! We're going to get this passed, I know it!
Fred
#65
Posted 06 June 2008 - 06:05 AM
#66
Posted 06 June 2008 - 06:41 AM
polhms1, on Jun 6 2008, 06:05 AM, said:
I'm trying to find it, there was a study that was released by Texas I believe where they screwed up their data and it came out wrong. They then corrected it but the brady group still refers to it as being true.
- Edmund Burke
It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice.
#67
Posted 06 June 2008 - 06:45 AM
Myth: Texas CCW holders are arrested 66% more often
Fact: Most arrests cited are not any form of violent crime (includes bounced checks or tax delinquency). 13
Fact: The VPC "study" only includes arrests, not convictions.
Fact: Many of these arrests in this premature VPC "study" came in the early years of Texas CCWs when the law was not understood by most of the law enforcement community or prosecutors.
Fact: Compared to the entire population, Texas CCW holders are about 7.6 times less likely to be arrested of a violent crime.14 The numbers breakdown as follows:
• 214,000 CCW holders15
• 526 (0.2%) felony arrests of CCW holders that have been adjudicated
• 100 (0.05%) felony convictions
- Edmund Burke
It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice.
#68
Posted 06 June 2008 - 07:36 AM
Big Chris, on Jun 6 2008, 07:41 AM, said:
polhms1, on Jun 6 2008, 06:05 AM, said:
I'm trying to find it, there was a study that was released by Texas I believe where they screwed up their data and it came out wrong. They then corrected it but the brady group still refers to it as being true.
I was looking at the book "More Guns Less Crime" and here are some figures they give for revolcation in different states.
Alaska, Of the permits issued from January 1, 1995 to August17, 1999, only .3% were revolked for any reason. None involved the firing of a gun. (Based an a call with the Alaska bureau responsible for issuing CCW permits)
Arizona, Of the permits issued between the end of the fall of 1994 and July 31, 1999 .1% were revolked though up to one half of these were revolcations for "administrative reasons" (such as people dying or saying that they no longer required the permit)(source Lt. Bill Whalen, Arizona Department of Public Safety)
Florida, of the permits issued during October 1, 1987, to February 28, 1999 .2% were revolked for any reason. Of these, 113, or .02% were revolked for any type of firearms-related violations, and almost all of these were nonthreatening.
Apparently there was a Florida state website that had this info. I went to the URL but I got Internet Explorer unable to display. The URL listed licgweb.dos.state.fl.us/stats/cw_monthly.html If a reference to this can be found on a Florida state website it would be very useful. What better thing than a state website to send someone to to verify the statistics you give them.
Here is an interesting quote by Doug Weil "Between 1996 and 1997 Texas experienced a 54% increase in the number of concealed carry permit holders arrested. This was mentioned in More Guns Less Crime!. Shocking isn't it! The author agrees that the figure is correct. It's "The Wild West in Texas" right? No the author goes on to mention that the number of permit holders went up 50% during that time making the rate at which the permit holders were arrested virtually unchanged.
I came across a quote by some anti that there were something like 25,000? firearm homicides in the U.S. (Figure may have been higher, can't kind the quote) He said only something like 225 or 250 were justifiable homicide by a concealed carry permit holder. I don't know the number of homicides by permit holders that weren't justifiable homicide, it would be interesting to compare the number as I imagine it is a very small % of the 25,000. This can just show that permit holders don't fire their handgun in just any provocation and aren't the problem.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I came across an interesting quote by W. Emerson Wright
No law ever written has stopped any robber, rapist or killer, like cold blue steel in the hands of their last intended victim.
Remember the 1991 Luby Cafeteria Massacre of the Unarmed (Kileen, Texas before Texas Concealed Carry) Do we need 23 people to die in a similar incident before we're allowed effective self defense?
Three school masacres have been stopped by civilians with firearms. Two with handguns and the third by a guy with a shotgun. (Pearl, Ms; Appalacian School of Law; Edinboro,Pa)
#69
Posted 06 June 2008 - 11:28 AM
RRSTAR.COM
Posted Jun 04, 2008 @ 07:02 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In response to Mark Kiltz’ letter, “Too immature for guns” (Your Views, May 24). This same cry always precedes the passing of legislation that allow citizens to carry concealed weapons.
It never happens. A concealed carry permit holder has never killed a police officer. There is no known case where a permit holder committed a crime while carrying.
When Florida passed its law, there were cries that Florida would turn into the “Gunshine State,” that every little traffic altercation would turn into The Wild West with guns blazing; that dead bodies strewn about as vigilantes would take the law into their own hands.
This scenario is predicted every time concealed carry laws are considered. Yet, it never happens — ever.
One thing, however, always happens after concealed carry laws are adopted: reduced violent crime, break-ins and sexual predation. If the law is passed, and you choose not to carry, you still benefit from your neighbors who do.
If you were a police officer, wouldn’t you rather have the intended victim point at a lifeless body and say, “It was him”? My wife doesn’t have that choice; it has been made for her by our Legislature.
— Scott A. Olson, Rockford
#71
Posted 06 June 2008 - 01:06 PM
Message[21781]: This petition request is invalid. Please try again ...
#73
Posted 06 June 2008 - 01:17 PM
Kenny, do you have AIM or something?
#74
Posted 06 June 2008 - 02:51 PM
SAK, on Jun 6 2008, 02:06 PM, said:
Message[21781]: This petition request is invalid. Please try again ...
Its working fine for me...
Using Mozilla Firefox...
Illinoiscarry Document Repository
Thanks to everyone who has contributed! Lets keep em coming!
#75
Posted 06 June 2008 - 03:08 PM
P.S. -- don't you live IN Chicago city limits, slappy, or am I mistaken
#76
Posted 06 June 2008 - 03:09 PM
No. Neither ATF nor any other Federal agency issues such a permit or license. Carrying permits may be issued by a State or local government.
This was taken from the ATF's website. Thought some of you might like to know how they stand on this issue.
#77
Posted 06 June 2008 - 03:11 PM
SAK, on Jun 6 2008, 04:08 PM, said:
P.S. -- don't you live IN Chicago city limits, slappy, or am I mistaken
I live in Cook County, next door to Chicago proper... need me to pick up some souvenirs or something for you, next time im in the loop?
Illinoiscarry Document Repository
Thanks to everyone who has contributed! Lets keep em coming!
#78
Posted 06 June 2008 - 04:01 PM
Know any gun owners in the city itself? I need some Chicago city gun owners.
#79
Posted 06 June 2008 - 09:00 PM
SAK, on Jun 6 2008, 05:01 PM, said:
Know any gun owners in the city itself? I need some Chicago city gun owners.
All my friends actually in Chicago are actually AFRAID to own guns... really...
and that says all you need to know about that city...
Illinoiscarry Document Repository
Thanks to everyone who has contributed! Lets keep em coming!
#80
Posted 06 June 2008 - 09:34 PM
Slappy, on Jun 6 2008, 10:00 PM, said:
They are afraid of the guns, or afraid to own?
but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda,
they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles." — Jeff Cooper, The Art of the Rifle
#81
Posted 06 June 2008 - 09:37 PM
Buzzard, on Jun 6 2008, 10:34 PM, said:
They are afraid of the guns, or afraid to own?
afraid to own... most have enjoyed range time with me and would own if it wasnt for insane handgun laws... they are more afraid of the CPD than they are criminals and I suspect thats just how Daley likes it...
Illinoiscarry Document Repository
Thanks to everyone who has contributed! Lets keep em coming!
#82
Posted 08 June 2008 - 11:54 AM
#83
#84
Posted 08 June 2008 - 01:16 PM
#85
Posted 08 June 2008 - 01:37 PM
And to those who know me well, I ask,"Why are you afraid of ME carrying a gun? Do you not trust me?" (Normally they HAVE to say, no; or I challenge them to explain why this little, loving, 5'2" lady, with three years military training, scares them.)
It's changing or challenging one person at a time. Most of those who are afraid of guns are not thinking "individuals they know;" they are thinking "violent gangs and murderers." We have to change the image of gun owners.
WE ARE THE GOOD GUYS!
flagtag, on Jun 8 2008, 02:02 PM, said:
#86
Posted 08 June 2008 - 01:37 PM
polhms1, on Jun 8 2008, 12:54 PM, said:
Hey Kenny,
#87
Posted 08 June 2008 - 01:38 PM
polhms1, on Jun 8 2008, 12:54 PM, said:
Hey Kenny,
I will be there @ 5pm. I would like to get a few buttons and throw you a few bucks for everything you've done. Where should I expect to find you?
Gooch
#88
Posted 08 June 2008 - 01:39 PM
MWG321, on Jun 8 2008, 02:16 PM, said:
Official mailboxes, NO! That's a federal offense. Newspaper boxes are ok. Door knob, or stuck between the door and the frames are ok too
#89
Posted 08 June 2008 - 03:07 PM
Tere Dunlap, on Jun 8 2008, 02:39 PM, said:
MWG321, on Jun 8 2008, 02:16 PM, said:
Official mailboxes, NO! That's a federal offense. Newspaper boxes are ok. Door knob, or stuck between the door and the frames are ok too
Good Call Tere!!!!! We need everyone to do what will keep the attention on the positive and not by reporting that someone stuck a flyer in a mailbox.
#90
Posted 08 June 2008 - 03:16 PM
Fred S. Wescott
Winnebago County Board
District 9
www.FREDWESCOTT.com
CAP...Conceal And Protect
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











