Jump to content

Shepard update 7/27 -- dismissed as moot


Recommended Posts

Posted · Hidden by mauserme, July 26, 2013 at 05:21 PM - No reason given
Hidden by mauserme, July 26, 2013 at 05:21 PM - No reason given
Allow me to suggest that we refrain from posting in this thread until a ruling is announced - for following and subscribing's sake. And yes, I realize I am making a post here in order to say that, but that's my humble suggestion/request at the expense of making a post myself.
Link to comment
Posted · Hidden by mauserme, July 26, 2013 at 05:21 PM - No reason given
Hidden by mauserme, July 26, 2013 at 05:21 PM - No reason given

Seconded. No conjecture. We do not fill this thread with posts until Stiehl rules. It is so ordered. Hehe

 

Sent from my SCH-R530U using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment

Docket Text:

ORDER DISMISSING CASE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. MOTION for Declaration of Unconstitutionality and Preliminary and/or Permanent Injunction [75] filed by Mary Shepard, Illinois State Rifle Association is DISMISSED; MOTION to Expedite Briefing [76] filed by Mary Shepard, Illinois State Rifle Association is DENIED as moot; MOTION to Dismiss [78] filed by David Livesay, AND MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction [73] filed by Tyler R Edmonds, Patrick J Quinn, Lisa M Madigan are GRANTED. ACTION DUE by 8/9/2013--parties to brief issue of award of costs and fees. Signed by Judge William D. Stiehl on 7/26/2013. (jaf )

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Holy crap. This is simply silly. the hate for guns drives these rulings. If it was VOTING or SPEECH or RECORDING a public official, or Illegal Searches! This would have have been different. If you dont believe that you are simply putting blinders on!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Docket Text:

ORDER DISMISSING CASE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. MOTION for Declaration of Unconstitutionality and Preliminary and/or Permanent Injunction [75] filed by Mary Shepard, Illinois State Rifle Association is DISMISSED; MOTION to Expedite Briefing [76] filed by Mary Shepard, Illinois State Rifle Association is DENIED as moot; MOTION to Dismiss [78] filed by David Livesay, AND MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction [73] filed by Tyler R Edmonds, Patrick J Quinn, Lisa M Madigan are GRANTED. ACTION DUE by 8/9/2013--parties to brief issue of award of costs and fees. Signed by Judge William D. Stiehl on 7/26/2013. (jaf )

 

Question on what I bolded in Red. Does this mean no FOID Carry?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Docket Text:

ORDER DISMISSING CASE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. MOTION for Declaration of Unconstitutionality and Preliminary and/or Permanent Injunction [75] filed by Mary Shepard, Illinois State Rifle Association is DISMISSED; MOTION to Expedite Briefing [76] filed by Mary Shepard, Illinois State Rifle Association is DENIED as moot; MOTION to Dismiss [78] filed by David Livesay, AND MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction [73] filed by Tyler R Edmonds, Patrick J Quinn, Lisa M Madigan are GRANTED. ACTION DUE by 8/9/2013--parties to brief issue of award of costs and fees. Signed by Judge William D. Stiehl on 7/26/2013. (jaf )

 

Question on what I bolded in Red. Does this mean no FOID Carry?

 

For the moment, pending the anticipated appeal to the 7th, yes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would assume this possibility was anticipated, and there is some paperwork ready for the trip to CA7...

 

Yeah, I would hope... It's been common speculation around there that it was going back to the 7th, I can't see the speculation from the ISRA/NRA lawyers being any different, and I suspect a rough draft that will only need to be cleaned up is ready to go 7th, in fact I would expect filing nearly immediately...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No FOID carry

 

Not YET. LOL

 

We all knew this would end up back at the 7th for final disposition one way or another.

 

I just hope they move on it quickly.

 

How much time does the state have to file an answer to the ISRA's appeal of this decision?

 

I would assume this possibility was anticipated, and there is some paperwork ready for the trip to CA7...

 

 

I would imagine so, although they will probably have to take a bit of time to answer his specific reasons for ruling the way he did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really get lost with all this legalese. What really concerns me is if the "new law" moots the claim. What prevents the GA from changing the law, re install a total ban? Yes the law is in place, but no permits for months.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...