Jump to content


Photo

Gun free zones roll out a red carpet for mass murderers. It's time to roll it up.


  • Please log in to reply
14 replies to this topic

#1 Thomas Paine

  • Members
  • 9 posts
  • Joined: 07-June 18

Posted 23 June 2018 - 05:01 PM

From schools to theaters to waffle houses, the lunacy has to stop. Every journey starts with a first step. Why not give this one a chance to go viral on the whitehouse.gov website?
 
 
It can't go viral until it reaches the 150 signatures needed for it to be seen by the general public. If you're reading this and not doing what you can to push the solution, you're part of the problem.


#2 mic6010

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,558 posts
  • Joined: 04-January 14

Posted 23 June 2018 - 05:13 PM

You know those petitions were just a propaganda tool for the Obama administration right ?  They made up a problem in the form of a question and then pretended to solve it.

The problems they solved shockingly (or maybe not so much) always coincided with their political agenda. Always.  It was just a way to give the masses of useful idiots an illusion of a peoples government while they spent their days trying to destroy America.

 

 

And anyways that kinda law would need Congress to pass it.  Trump deosn't really have many friends these days up on capitol hill.


"Living in Chicago, it used to be, 'don't go out at night,' or 'be more careful at night'. Now it's turned into a place where it doesn't matter if it's day or night."  - John Hendricks.


#3 Thomas Paine

  • Members
  • 9 posts
  • Joined: 07-June 18

Posted 23 June 2018 - 05:46 PM

If Obama invented the hammer, would you refuse to use it? Trump will sign legislation like this if we put the pressure on Congress to pass it. But, we'll never know what will happen until it breaks through the 150 barrier with legitimate email addresses so the votes can be confirmed.
 
It's a miracle that we haven't yet had a terrorist attack on a school here. They can see the red carpet. I signed the petition because I don't want blood on may hands the next time a kid is killed in a school.


#4 Gamma

    Member

  • Members
  • 2,401 posts
  • Joined: 29-December 13

Posted 23 June 2018 - 06:08 PM

"Gun Free Zone" = designated victims zone.

Good luck getting Congress to figure that out.

They can't even allow carry in wilderness areas where hunting is allowed.

Edited by Gamma, 23 June 2018 - 06:09 PM.

Illinois' FCCA is a prime example of the maxim that sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice.

#5 Thomas Paine

  • Members
  • 9 posts
  • Joined: 07-June 18

Posted 23 June 2018 - 10:05 PM

They don't have to figure anything out. A common sense solution will be staring them in the face if we make them look at it. If you have a better idea, let's have it. Otherwise, don't throw a monkey wrench into this one.

 



#6 Smallbore

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,428 posts
  • Joined: 17-December 07

Posted 24 June 2018 - 07:09 AM

I signed it.
We have few vocal anti2nd negative people on this forum.

#7 GLOCK22

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 147 posts
  • Joined: 05-April 15

Posted 24 June 2018 - 07:27 AM

Signed
"Sheep don't tell wolves what's for dinner"

#8 steveTA1983

    Member

  • Supporting Members Team
  • 1,486 posts
  • Joined: 14-December 15

Posted 24 June 2018 - 09:06 AM

You know those petitions were just a propaganda tool for the Obama administration right ?  They made up a problem in the form of a question and then pretended to solve it.
The problems they solved shockingly (or maybe not so much) always coincided with their political agenda. Always.  It was just a way to give the masses of useful idiots an illusion of a peoples government while they spent their days trying to destroy America.
 
 
And anyways that kinda law would need Congress to pass it.  Trump deosn't really have many friends these days up on capitol hill.


This. Ignore these White House petitions. They where only for the Obama administration. Trump’s team isn’t doing anything with them

#9 TomKoz

    Member

  • Supporting Members Team
  • 3,384 posts
  • Joined: 04-February 10

Posted 24 June 2018 - 09:45 AM

Signed and posted on the Facebook
Stay Alert ... Stay Alive !!

#10 Plinkermostly

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 664 posts
  • Joined: 20-April 13

Posted 24 June 2018 - 02:26 PM

I will NEVER understand the logic of a GFZ.

 

signed



#11 chicagoresident

    Member

  • Supporting Members Team
  • 1,236 posts
  • Joined: 19-January 16

Posted 24 June 2018 - 05:26 PM

They don't have to figure anything out. A common sense solution will be staring them in the face if we make them look at it. If you have a better idea, let's have it. Otherwise, don't throw a monkey wrench into this one.[/size]

I would be happy if some victims won a few lawsuits against Pulse, MGM, and Marjorie Stoneman.

The aurora theater lawsuit was a travesty
http://www.latimes.c...snap-story.html

It's rediculous the leftist logic that believes its bad legal precedence to sue a facility that provides inadequate security
http://www.orlandose...0611-story.html

But suing gun manufacturers for misuse is good legal precedence
https://www.revealne...-for-shootings/

#12 chislinger

    Member

  • Members
  • 5,909 posts
  • Joined: 21-November 13

Posted 25 June 2018 - 09:04 AM

I will NEVER understand the logic of a GFZ.
 
signed

It's all based on the nonsensical reasoning that mass shootings are spur-of-the-moment decisions (rather than planned) or tragic accidents. Not that any ever were, but that's the only logical conclusion.
"I'm not worried about following the U.S. Constitution." - Washington County, Alabama Judge Nick Williams

#13 cybermgk

    Member

  • Supporting Members Team
  • 1,685 posts
  • Joined: 10-October 17

Posted 25 June 2018 - 12:36 PM

 


But suing gun manufacturers for misuse is good legal precedence
https://www.revealne...-for-shootings/

 

To be fair, two of the 3 suits referenced are suing stores, alleging illegal sale of a firearm, then used in murder.  Those, are not too dangerous. They actually, IF proven are allowed by law.  The other against Bushmaster is very dangerous, since it hasn't been struck down as against The Lawful Commerce in Arms Act already.  AMong other things it is trying to make it a public record that AR-15s are "military weapon, “engineered to deliver maximum carnage with extreme efficiency,” and that its design features “exceptional muzzle velocity, the ability to accommodate large-capacity magazines, and effective rapid fire.”" and that "gun maker and seller should have known that people unfit to operate the weapons would gain access to them. In particular, the families say, Bushmaster should have known of the “unreasonably high risk” that the rifle would be used in a mass shooting.".  I have no idea how it isn't being struck down because of the afore mentioned law.


ISRA Member

NRA Member

U.S.A.F Veteran

Single Father of 2


#14 JTHunter

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 999 posts
  • Joined: 29-November 13

Posted 25 June 2018 - 03:21 PM

I will NEVER understand the logic of a GFZ.

 

signed

 

That's because there IS no logic in the basic premise.


“We, the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow men who pervert the Constitution.” - - Abraham Lincoln

“Small minds adhere to the letter of the law; great minds dispense Justice.” - - S. C. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes

Life member NAHC, Endowment member NRA

#15 Plinkermostly

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 664 posts
  • Joined: 20-April 13

Posted 26 June 2018 - 12:28 PM

Try to tell that to 'them,'






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users