Jump to content


Photo

Johnson vs ISP - IL Supreme Court Rules 7-0 Win for Johnson


  • Please log in to reply
20 replies to this topic

#1 Molly B.

    IllinoisCarry spokesperson

  • Moderator
  • 16,592 posts
  • Joined: 18-April 05

Posted 01 October 2018 - 12:37 PM

Judge Dunn, circuit judge in Wabash County has ruled in favor of our plaintiff in Johnson vs ISP.  This case challenges the lifetime ban on firearm possession for individuals prohibited for misdemeanor domestic battery convictions under the federal Lautenberg Act.  It is similar to the Corum case which won in IL Supreme Court a few years ago but a new challenge was needed after IL changed IL law right after the Corum ruling.

 

The Judge Dunn's ruling is attached. If appealed this case will advance to the IL Supreme Court because of the constitutional challenge. (This copy is not signed but will be once we get a copy of the ruling filed with the clerk.)

 

Attached File  ORDER Regarding Second Amendment As Applied Challenge (Shawna Johnson v. ISP, Wabash CO. No. 2013-MR-15)(FINAL DRAFT - SEPT 29 2018 at 11 PM).pdf   379.95KB   361 downloads


"It does not take a majority to prevail ... but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men." --Samuel Adams

#2 pro2a

  • Members
  • 19 posts
  • Joined: 20-March 12

Posted 01 October 2018 - 01:53 PM

Her “as applied” challenge is not only “ripe,” but, this court holds, it should bear
fruit as her request to have her FOID Card reinstated must be granted.

#3 speedbump

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,221 posts
  • Joined: 20-August 13

Posted 02 October 2018 - 05:43 AM

Good for Shawna! It looks like she had half the L.E. in Wabash County speak in her favor.
"The struggle may be a moral one, or it may be a physical one, or it may be both. But it must be a struggle. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will."

~Frederick Douglass~

#4 Flynn

    Member

  • Members
  • 2,379 posts
  • Joined: 20-August 18

Posted 11 February 2019 - 01:08 AM

Any updates on if this was actually appealed to the IL Supreme Court or any status updates at all?


Anonymous leakers, leak anonymously about the anonymous leak.
 
—Anonymous

#5 pro2a

  • Members
  • 19 posts
  • Joined: 20-March 12

Posted 11 February 2019 - 07:52 AM

This was appealed to Illinois supreme court. We are in the early stages hoping for a ruling by fall.

#6 Flynn

    Member

  • Members
  • 2,379 posts
  • Joined: 20-August 18

Posted 11 February 2019 - 11:39 AM

This was appealed to Illinois supreme court. We are in the early stages hoping for a ruling by fall.

 

Thank you much for the update.


Anonymous leakers, leak anonymously about the anonymous leak.
 
—Anonymous

#7 Molly B.

    IllinoisCarry spokesperson

  • Moderator
  • 16,592 posts
  • Joined: 18-April 05

Posted 22 October 2019 - 02:16 PM

Oral arguments have been scheduled for Tuesday, Nov. 19th.


"It does not take a majority to prevail ... but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men." --Samuel Adams

#8 pro2a

  • Members
  • 19 posts
  • Joined: 20-March 12

Posted 22 October 2019 - 05:32 PM

You're quick Mollyb! She was getting ready to text you!

#9 Molly B.

    IllinoisCarry spokesperson

  • Moderator
  • 16,592 posts
  • Joined: 18-April 05

Posted 19 November 2019 - 10:43 AM

IMG_20191119_104111552.jpg

Arguments to begin shortly!
"It does not take a majority to prevail ... but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men." --Samuel Adams

#10 RacerDave6

    Member

  • Supporting Members Team
  • 3,489 posts
  • Joined: 16-March 07

Posted 19 November 2019 - 02:24 PM

I see there's a good 2A lawyer up there today.
Firearms are not a talisman against evil. When used properly, they are an antidote to evil. T.Dunn

"Shoot the bad guy and keep shooting him until he stops doing whatever it
was that got him shot in the first place."


Match Director-IDPA at ASC
United States Riflemans Asscn instructor
NRA Certified instructor
NRA & ISRA member
Illinois Firearm Concealed Carry License instructor

#11 speedbump

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,221 posts
  • Joined: 20-August 13

Posted 19 November 2019 - 03:14 PM

Go, Shawna!
"The struggle may be a moral one, or it may be a physical one, or it may be both. But it must be a struggle. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will."

~Frederick Douglass~

#12 THE KING

    Member

  • Members
  • 2,774 posts
  • Joined: 19-March 09

Posted 19 November 2019 - 03:24 PM

Can someone let us know what is going on.

NRA Patriot Life Member - Endowment
ISRA Member
NRA Certified Basic Pistol Instructor
NRA Certified Range Safety Officer
ISP Certified Illinois Conceal Carry Instructor
Retired Professional Firefighter / Paramedic


#13 Molly B.

    IllinoisCarry spokesperson

  • Moderator
  • 16,592 posts
  • Joined: 18-April 05

Posted 19 November 2019 - 03:36 PM

https://multimedia.i...1919_124213.mp4

Video of oral arguments more posted.
"It does not take a majority to prevail ... but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men." --Samuel Adams

#14 Molly B.

    IllinoisCarry spokesperson

  • Moderator
  • 16,592 posts
  • Joined: 18-April 05

Posted Yesterday, 09:28 AM

After six long years in the court system - IL Supreme Court rules in favor of Shawna Johnson!!  7-0

 

 

For the foregoing reasons, we hold that, under section 10 of the FOID Card Act, granting Johnson relief would not be contrary to federal law. 430 ILCS 65/10©(4) (West 2012). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the circuit court directing the issuance of a FOID card to Johnson. Based on our holding, there is no need to address the constitutional basis for the trial court’s ruling. Accordingly, we vacate the circuit court’s holding that section 922(g)(9) and the provisions of the FOID Card Act (id. §§ 8(n), 10( :cool:, 10©(4)), along with the relevant provisions of the Illinois Administrative Code, are unconstitutional as applied to Johnson.
¶ 52
Affirmed in part and vacated in part.

 

 

 

 

Attached File  IL Supreme Court ruling Johnson v ISP.pdf   81.72KB   55 downloads


"It does not take a majority to prevail ... but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men." --Samuel Adams

#15 Molly B.

    IllinoisCarry spokesperson

  • Moderator
  • 16,592 posts
  • Joined: 18-April 05

Posted Yesterday, 09:59 AM

Page 9, para 30 - this is a huge step for IL Supreme Court:  We find that (1) the right to keep and bear arms is a “civil right,” (2) Illinois has a regulatory mechanism to restore those rights through an individualized determination, and (3) relief granted under section 10 of the FOID Card Act constitutes a sufficient restoration of civil rights as intended by section 921(a)(33)( b(ii).

 

This could affect many, many denials based on "issuing a FOID card would be contrary to federal law".


"It does not take a majority to prevail ... but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men." --Samuel Adams

#16 steveTA84

    Member

  • Supporting Members Team
  • 6,364 posts
  • Joined: 14-December 15

Posted Yesterday, 10:33 AM

I see this as the groundwork to start possibly flooding the ISP with lawsuits

#17 pro2a

  • Members
  • 19 posts
  • Joined: 20-March 12

Posted Yesterday, 10:44 AM

Long time coming indeed! This is what can happen when people step up and fight for their rights!

#18 Molly B.

    IllinoisCarry spokesperson

  • Moderator
  • 16,592 posts
  • Joined: 18-April 05

Posted Yesterday, 11:59 AM

I see this as the groundwork to start possibly flooding the ISP with lawsuits

It is definitely groundwork for petitioning courts for FOID cards that have been denied or revoked and CCLs that have been denied because of decades old cases turning up in background checks.


"It does not take a majority to prevail ... but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men." --Samuel Adams

#19 Penumbra1811

    Member

  • Supporting Members Team
  • Pip
  • 75 posts
  • Joined: 12-October 17

Posted Yesterday, 01:05 PM

This is great I believe it's going to help many people especially me when I go to court next month.

#20 cybermgk

    Member

  • Supporting Members Team
  • 2,240 posts
  • Joined: 10-October 17

Posted Yesterday, 02:05 PM

Page 9, para 30 - this is a huge step for IL Supreme Court:  We find that (1) the right to keep and bear arms is a “civil right,” (2) Illinois has a regulatory mechanism to restore those rights through an individualized determination, and (3) relief granted under section 10 of the FOID Card Act constitutes a sufficient restoration of civil rights as intended by section 921(a)(33)( b(ii).

 

This could affect many, many denials based on "issuing a FOID card would be contrary to federal law".

Yes, but civil rights, as opposed to inalienable rights, can be restricted via code and law.  Not sure, I like that finding


ISRA Member

NRA Member

U.S.A.F Veteran

Single Father of 2


#21 chislinger

    Member

  • Members
  • 6,724 posts
  • Joined: 21-November 13

Posted Yesterday, 08:04 PM

Yes, but civil rights, as opposed to inalienable rights, can be restricted via code and law.  Not sure, I like that finding

They are the same. Life is an inalienable right, but under law you can be executed for certain crimes.
"I'm not worried about following the U.S. Constitution." - Washington County, Alabama Judge Nick Williams




4 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users


    Facebook (1)