Jump to content

jmeyers

Members
  • Posts

    197
  • Joined

  • Last visited

jmeyers's Achievements

Member

Member (4/24)

  1. Ill chime in here that I know of atleast 1 attorney that would be happy to represent in a phone based appeal for the NM residents (not sure who/how would pay the bill for it), but if you want that contact info PM me.
  2. I would suggest turning it in to your local PD, obtain a letter with date that you turned it in, and then file the appeal http://www.isp.state.il.us/firearms/foid/revocation-appeal.pdf I would also ask the Sergeant who ran your file (believe thats against rules unless they have a reason) to see if he could give you a copy to attach to the appeal Generally an attorney is not needed since you have information showing it to be a mistaken identity.
  3. A lot of this has been and continues to be argued in Meyers vs Schmitz. Next up will be arguing it to the ALJ next week.
  4. Also important to note the voluntary admission is not a disqualified of a FOID (possession) but is for CCW for the purpose of carrying although the 2013 survey indicates this
  5. Meyers vs Schmitz is going to a hearing on Sept 7 to try and disqualify this insane survey. Cup vs Madigan is in Court on Sept 22 (can't speak for what the yard doing) 430 ILCS 65/ has the following regarding mental illness under Section 4: iv) He or she has not been a patient in a mental health facility within the past 5 years, or if he or she has been a patient in a mental health facility more than 5 years ago, submit the certification required under subsection (u) of Section 8 of the FOID xv) He or she has not been adjudicated as a person with a mental disability xvi) He or she has not been involuntarily admitted into a mental health facility The survey is asking something the FOID (430 ILCS 65/) , FCCA (430 ILCS 66/) and Admin Code (20 Ill. Admin. Code 12310.10) does not unless Im missing it, in that the Survey asks regarding possession and the aforementioned docs mention carrying. Just for clarification purposes, substantially similar as of today means: - Comparable state regulars who may carry firearms concealed or otherwise in public - Prohibits all who have involuntary mental health admissions, and this with voluntary admissions within 5 years from carrying firearms concealed or otherwise in public - Reports Denied persons to NICS - Participates in reporting persons authorized to carry firearms, concealed or otherwise in public through NLETs
  6. Surprise! State of IL has asked for a 3 Day Motion for Extension of Time (to July 8) due to: Attorney Aziz will be out of the office on July 5 due to a religious holiday
  7. Page 7 - Plaintiff does not appear to challenge the constitutionality of 430 ILCS 66/40 itself. Well theres a clue, lets challenge it now
  8. I just pulled it an hour ago and it wasn't there. Oh well, lets see what happens next
  9. Isn't this nice of the State of Illinois Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams: Status Conference held on 1/21/2016. Tom Maag for Plaintiff. Bilal Aziz for Defendant. Defendant reports that a settlement conference would be futile in this case. Parties agree that case will be decided by outcome of motions currently being briefed. Should the case survive summary judgment, the parties are directed to contact the Court upon receipt of a ruling on the pending motions for the purpose of scheduling a status conference. (Court Reporter n/a.) (amv)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. (Entered: 01/21/2016)
×
×
  • Create New...