Jump to content

All Pro

Members
  • Posts

    66
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

325 profile views

All Pro's Achievements

Member

Member (2/24)

  1. I had my AUUW vacated based on Aguilar. The arrest was in 2001.That did not stop the Cook Pizza Man Dart from objecting ! I filed and still pending a federal lawsuit against the Board and unknown objectors.the State turned over who the objector was and also issued my CCL. No doubt the court will dismiss the State, but I do have a chance at that phony azz Sheriff.. I am not 100% sure but I believe in one case against the ISP and CCB I read where a FOID card violation was not a crime if you were under 21..I hope that is correct,for your sake.
  2. https://www.illinois.gov/.../Expungement/.../Expungement-and-Sealing-General-Infor.. The above link gives you all the info.you need for Illinois. The CCB in Illinois and the objectors do not care if you were convicted or not. The more interactions you have had with the police the chances of a CCL in this State are reduced. This makes you a danger to yourself or others and the system is setup so you cant beat them.Go check illinois Appelate court decisions,look up Defendants Illinois State Police and or the Concealed Carry Board.If anyone reading this has a prior UUW before 2014 you can have this Expunged because that Il.law was unconstitutional.The case is Aguilar v State of Illinois.Any attorney who tells you he can get you a CCL if you have a previous felony in this state is full of dogdirt.
  3. Goodluck! Let us know what happens. Sorry for the delay in answering.. The State answered and the judge refused the default. The answer is I have no rights under the 11th Amendment to file a suit. The board and the member's are like a judge and state atty { suit-proof }. I then answered and Judge Lee is supposed to send a decision by mail before the 26th, to let us know if we go to trial or not.Also we have a hearing on the 26th Oct. at 9 am. The law is clear the the board is suit-proof, unless their actions are Willful and Wanton. Because of my job I have a PERC card.My employer applied for a FCC card for me to be armed while working..The ISP approved my right to carry while working and the Dept.Of Pro.Reg.issued my FCC ! This has been over a year, So.. I am no danger working in Shitcagos West and South sides { armed } per the ISP and DPR, yet the CCB must believe I am a danger since they have done NOTHING since I applied 10/01/15. By the way I filed this Pro-Se, a lawyer would never take a case like this on a contingency. My arguments are they are violating my 5th 6th & 14th amendments. What could be more Willful and Wanton than the ISP giving me the right to carry while working but the arm of the ISP denying my right to carry for 25 months !? Any ideas would be appreciated because if the judge rules in favor of the state, I will be headed to the Appellate court.
  4. I filed my lawsuit they failed to answer so the Board and its members are in default. Tomorrow I am filing a motion and naming Sheriff Dart as A subject of NOBLE CAUSE CORRUPTION. This is when a LEO does what is wrong but believes the end justifies the means..His objections based on the % of being overturned fits him perfectly. Up before Judge John Lee next Wednesday, hopefully I will get a court order to stop this Moron.. Check his 60 minute interview with Leslie Stahl in May 2017. Half of his 7500 inmates are not criminals or a danger to anyone ! Yet us members or anyone who just walked past the Police and have not been to his Hotel in the last 20 years, he objects to a CCL..
  5. Congrats Anaya ! Just wondering when was the objection originally filed ?? Bubbacs, please remove you're scary clown picture ...
  6. I have e mailed the ISP from the page when checking on my 10 month long objection, they reply the same day and are very nice people by phone or email. As for Dart, he has never been the police, a Politician. Interesting read at Secondcitycop on how his inmates are running the asylum !!
×
×
  • Create New...