Jump to content

Cody Wilson (3D) charged with sex assault.


2smartby1/2

Recommended Posts

This whole situation is messed up beyond belief. If Wilson didn't know that she was under 18, and she misrepresented herself, then he has at least a shot at a viable defense, and she should be prosecuted for breaking the law and misrepresenting herself as a legal adult.

 

However, Wilson is an idiot for paying for sex was stupid, regardless of the fact that prohibitions on sex work are violations of natural rights and likely the 4th and 14th Amendments, despite what the 9th Circuit Court ruled in ESPLERP v Gascon, because Lawrence v. Texas should have decided that sex between consenting adults (regardless if it is paid for) is not the government's business. I know he's an anarchist, and believes that personal freedom is sacrosanct and outside of the government's purview to limit, but he's dug himself into a hole here, unless he plans to mount another challenge against stupid government restrictions, such as when even one of the Ninth Circuit panel members noted the stretch that it's illegal to sell something thats legal to give away." In that light, the moralistic idiocy of making prostitution illegal between consenting adults is unequivocal.

 

That being said, Wilson is in a lot of trouble, and that's unfortunately going to detract from the vital 1st Amendment and 2nd Amendment case that he was involved in.

Kind of ironic that Cody Wilson made an entire career out of pushing the limits of gun laws but when it came to paying for sex he ignored the porn loophole.

 

It's an inside industry secret that several porn studios make most of their money legally pimping out their talent to anyone with a camera and cash. All 100% legal, the studio maintains all the compliance. It's all very discrete since nobody wants to kill their main source of revenue in the world of free porn. Most importantly, in every studio there are towers of file cabinets with very thorough verification that the talent is of age.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I no longer believe any of these "sex assault" claims anymore.

Well, there's video of this one. So unless you think they were watching music videos or talking about the latest Boruto for 50 minutes, it's pretty credible.

There's video of them meeting which doesn't mean anything and he thought he was meeting a consenting adult and doesn't mean he is guilty. You fell for the propaganda. Just because she and the police allege that doesn't mean is true. There's no video of him raping a child as alleged. He thought he was gonna have sex with a consenting adult and a sugar baby as she was claiming to be and I don't see a problem with two consenting adults meeting.

 

Any way is sugar coated, sugar babies have sex for money and by definition are prostitutes. She is a liberal prostitute who had sex for money and tried to get him when she looked up who he was before meeting him and set him up. She knew what she was doing by becoming a member of that site and lying about her age and was looking to make money in exchange for sex. I think she should be prosecuted for being a prostitute and not him, he is the victim and was set up.

 

He is guilty of having sex with a prostitute which should be legal anyway and it is in a lot of countries. This stinks to high heaven as a setup and everyone knows liberals were trying to get him and I don't doubt if they paid the right people to get him. He made a mistake to tell her who he was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Well, there's video of this one. So unless you think they were watching music videos or talking about the latest Boruto for 50 minutes, it's pretty credible.

There's video of them meeting which doesn't mean anything and he thought he was meeting a consenting adult and doesn't mean he is guilty. You fell for the propaganda.

...

 

There's hotel video of them going up to the room and coming back from the room. Yeah, it's too bad those cops are such liars. I really fell for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, there's video of this one. So unless you think they were watching music videos or talking about the latest Boruto for 50 minutes, it's pretty credible.There's video of them meeting which doesn't mean anything and he thought he was meeting a consenting adult and doesn't mean he is guilty. You fell for the propaganda....There's hotel video of them going up to the room and coming back from the room. Yeah, it's too bad those cops are such liars. I really fell for it.

Is there video of them having sex?

 

Is there proof he explicitly paid for sex? There's a reason that escort services and sites like the one they used are technically legal.

 

Is there proof he knew she was underage?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Well, there's video of this one. So unless you think they were watching music videos or talking about the latest Boruto for 50 minutes, it's pretty credible.

There's video of them meeting which doesn't mean anything and he thought he was meeting a consenting adult and doesn't mean he is guilty. You fell for the propaganda.

...

 

There's hotel video of them going up to the room and coming back from the room. Yeah, it's too bad those cops are such liars. I really fell for it.

 

Just because there's video of them going to the room and coming back from the room with a sugar baby which he met on a website where you have to be 18 to be a member and where women have sex for money doesn't mean he raped a child. That video is proof that he is innocent and she willingly went to the room to have sex for money. Did he force her to go to the room and to be a sugar baby? The sugar baby and the police said it so it must be true. They are liars for saying he raped a child.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

There's video of them meeting which doesn't mean anything and he thought he was meeting a consenting adult and doesn't mean he is guilty. You fell for the propaganda.

...

 

There's hotel video of them going up to the room and coming back from the room. Yeah, it's too bad those cops are such liars. I really fell for it.

 

Just because there's video of them going to the room and coming back from the room with a sugar baby which he met on a website where you have to be 18 to be a member and where women have sex for money doesn't mean he raped a child. That video is proof that he is innocent and she willingly went to the room to have sex for money. Did he force her to go to the room and to be a sugar baby? The sugar baby and the police said it so it must be true. They are liars for saying he raped a child.

 

 

 

There are reasons why there are age of consent laws. It's because a small minority of gross adults will try to have sex with children, and yes 17 is definitely still a child.

 

Anyone trying to frame this as anything other than what it is, needs to examine their motivations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Well, there's video of this one. So unless you think they were watching music videos or talking about the latest Boruto for 50 minutes, it's pretty credible.There's video of them meeting which doesn't mean anything and he thought he was meeting a consenting adult and doesn't mean he is guilty. You fell for the propaganda....There's hotel video of them going up to the room and coming back from the room. Yeah, it's too bad those cops are such liars. I really fell for it.

Is there video of them having sex?

Is there proof he explicitly paid for sex? There's a reason that escort services and sites like the one they used are technically legal.

Is there proof he knew she was underage?

LOL, did he read to her from the hotel Bible for 50 minutes?

 

While not a setup I think there's definitely parallel construction going on here. The amount of evidence and timeframe is too clean to be coincidentally when she spoke to a counselor. That was probably a victims counselor provided to her by law enforcement because the investigation was already ongoing.

 

There's a major FBI crackdown ongoing right now enforcing the newly signed FOSTA-SESTA online anti sex trafficking bill. Even if the girl lied about her age under the new law the website is now liable. You'll probably see it earn the coveted "siezed by the FBI" in a few days/weeks.

https://www.wired.com/story/feds-seize-backpagecom-site-linked-to-sex-trafficking/ Ironically those against the bill also mounted a 1st ammendment challenge.

 

My guess is that law enforcement probably siezed all chat logs from another case recently and persuaded this girl to talk. They may not want to let other potential suspects know they're being investigated, hence the vague detail about turning him into a counselor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL, did he read to her from the hotel Bible for 50 minutes?

 

While not a setup I think there's definitely parallel construction going on here. The amount of evidence and timeframe is too clean to be coincidentally when she spoke to a counselor. That was probably a victims counselor provided to her by law enforcement because the investigation was already ongoing.

...

Dang, the Bible, that's a better hypothetical than music videos or Boruto.

 

As for why a counselor, it makes sense that the cops would not interview her directly, since she's a minor. Her parents or the Texas version of Children and Family Services would get stuck into the mix.

 

As for how the cops knew to nab her, I think it could be a couple things. Maybe the feds were already monitoring the web site and notified the local PD, but maybe somebody on the hotel staff called the cops. It was a hotel big enough to have an elevator and a 7th floor. Maybe it was a hotel big enough that it didn't want any part of that kind of thing. Maybe somebody at Whataburger (like maybe even a cop) overheard her talking about how she got $500 for sex. We may never know, because the whole thing could end up being sealed, since the principal witness and statutory victim is a minor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

LOL, did he read to her from the hotel Bible for 50 minutes?While not a setup I think there's definitely parallel construction going on here. The amount of evidence and timeframe is too clean to be coincidentally when she spoke to a counselor. That was probably a victims counselor provided to her by law enforcement because the investigation was already ongoing....

Dang, the Bible, that's a better hypothetical than music videos or Boruto.As for why a counselor, it makes sense that the cops would not interview her directly, since she's a minor. Her parents or the Texas version of Children and Family Services would get stuck into the mix.As for how the cops knew to nab her, I think it could be a couple things. Maybe the feds were already monitoring the web site and notified the local PD, but maybe somebody on the hotel staff called the cops. It was a hotel big enough to have an elevator and a 7th floor. Maybe it was a hotel big enough that it didn't want any part of that kind of thing. Maybe somebody at Whataburger (like maybe even a cop) overheard her talking about how she got $500 for sex. We may never know, because the whole thing could end up being sealed, since the principal witness and statutory victim is a minor.

You guys are making a lot of assumptions. Why did she go to the hotel with him? What did she think they were gonna do, read the bible? What is she doing on that site looking for a sugar daddy and claiming to be 18. She is not as innocent as being portrayed. It's pretty credible that she went there to have sex for money and no evidence Wilson did something wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is she doing on that site looking for a sugar daddy and claiming to be 18. She is not as innocent as being portrayed. It's pretty credible that she went there to have sex for money and no evidence Wilson did something wrong.

Women that engage in this behavior at that young of an age are often previous victims of sexual abuse. There's a reason it's called "age of consent", because under a certain age kids are not capable of making this type of decision or entering into this act without being coerced.

 

Don't even try to justify that anything about the alleged charges are OK if true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

What is she doing on that site looking for a sugar daddy and claiming to be 18. She is not as innocent as being portrayed. It's pretty credible that she went there to have sex for money and no evidence Wilson did something wrong.

Women that engage in this behavior at that young of an age are often previous victims of sexual abuse. There's a reason it's called "age of consent", because under a certain age kids are not capable of making this type of decision or entering into this act without being coerced.

Don't even try to justify that anything about the alleged charges are OK if true.

I'm not justifying and not saying the alleged charges are ok if true. All I'm saying is that no evidence has been provided that proves the allegations are true and you shouldn't jump to conclusions and say he is guilty.

 

I believe based on the lack of evidence that the allegations are not true and they are false charges and they are trying to get him and he is innocent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not justifying and not saying the alleged charges are ok if true. All I'm saying is that no evidence has been provided that proves the allegations are true and you shouldn't jump to conclusions and say he is guilty.

I believe based on the lack of evidence that the allegations are not true and they are false charges and they are trying to get him and he is innocent.

Agreed, innocent til proven guilty. I think we can both agree that the body of evidence and the "cleanness" of this case are very suspect.

 

I guess we'll see the reasons why once it goes to court. I would keep an eye on https://www.sugardaddymeet.com for an FBI takedown notice. It's not just the credibility of a 3d gun law advocate on trial, but also the new SESTA/FOSTA laws regulating sex trafficking via public forums. Both issues push the boundaries of what is and isn't protected free speech VS liability.

 

Either this is a strange coincidence or the FBI in cooperation with local law enforcement is sending a warning by prosecuting Cody Wilson first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I'm not justifying and not saying the alleged charges are ok if true. All I'm saying is that no evidence has been provided that proves the allegations are true and you shouldn't jump to conclusions and say he is guilty.

I believe based on the lack of evidence that the allegations are not true and they are false charges and they are trying to get him and he is innocent.

Agreed, innocent til proven guilty. I think we can both agree that the body of evidence and the "cleanness" of this case are very suspect.

I guess we'll see the reasons why once it goes to court. I would keep an eye on https://www.sugardaddymeet.com for an FBI takedown notice. It's not just the credibility of a 3d gun law advocate on trial, but also the new SESTA/FOSTA laws regulating sex trafficking via public forums. Both issues push the boundaries of what is and isn't protected free speech VS liability.

Either this is a strange coincidence or the FBI in cooperation with local law enforcement is sending a warning by prosecuting Cody Wilson first.

Nothing to do with regulating sex and everything to do with 3D and liberal elements are after Cody and trying to make an example of him. Look at Strzok/Page.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems a lot of folks here are making an awful lot of assumptions. The media is presenting this as a done deal, while clearly seeing him as a mortal enemy for his 3-D printed gun involvement. I think we would all be better off waiting until ALL the facts are out before assuming he is a lowlife and guilty as charged.

FWIW, a very long time ago when I was 19 I met a girl who told me she went to a nearby college and was an 18 year old freshman. We dated and had a significant relationship (enough said) and after being with her about 2 months I discovered that she was only 15. I was working part time where someone else who worked at the same place said to me arent you a bit old to be dating my sister?. When I said I was 19 and she is 18, and that seems fine to me, he responded by telling me she was a high school sophomore and only 15. Turns out he was telling the truth. I stopped dating her and kept my fingers crossed that nothing more would come of it, since the age of consent was 16. It can happen to anyone.

Did you pay her 500 dollars for sex?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't doubt it that he was lured and set up.

 

So someone forced him to go to a hotel room with an underage girl?

 

No personal responsibility there?

 

Come on...

 

I'm not going to defend someone who's doing something indefensible. I don't care if he's someone on our side or not. In fact, if you fail to disavow people like this, then it muddy's the movement as a whole.

 

If it turns out he's innocent, I'll eat my words and apologize, but I can't imagine that they doctored video footage of him going into the hotel room with this girl. That's some tin foil hat conspiracy theory stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...