Jump to content


Photo

And now the Bicep Brace...

Started by InterestedBystander , Sep 13 2018 03:08 PM

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
5 replies to this topic

#1 InterestedBystander

    Member

  • Supporting Members Team
  • 8,263 posts
    • Joined: 15-March 13

Posted 13 September 2018 - 03:08 PM


NRA Life Member; ISRA Member
SAF Member; GOA Member
FFL-IL Supporter
🇺🇸

#2 spanishjames

    Member

  • Supporting Members Team
  • 3,380 posts
    • Joined: 09-February 12

Posted 13 September 2018 - 10:18 PM

I don't see anything wrong with shouldering a pistol brace. So take that Feinstein!

To disarm is to consent to slavery.

#3 BradS

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,911 posts
    • Joined: 30-August 13

Posted 14 September 2018 - 06:45 AM

I thought the ATF reversed their earlier decision
my target stands classified thread:

http://illinoiscarry...topic=40920&hl=

#4 InterestedBystander

    Member

  • Supporting Members Team
  • 8,263 posts
    • Joined: 15-March 13

Posted 14 September 2018 - 07:31 AM

I thought the ATF reversed their earlier decision

They did...last I recall shouldering a brace was ok now.

This is a prototype and I found a thread on arfcom where the inventor was participating. Im just not quite sure what problem it is solving. If one had shoulder issues it seems this would still transmit up through shoulder.

Edited by InterestedBystander, 14 September 2018 - 07:34 AM.

NRA Life Member; ISRA Member
SAF Member; GOA Member
FFL-IL Supporter
🇺🇸

#5 drumgod

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 627 posts
    • Joined: 26-January 13

Posted 14 September 2018 - 07:38 AM

Now show a weak side transition...  At least it probably won't knock your teeth out like that "chin brace".  The whole SBR/SBS thing really needs to go buh-bye.


#6 2A4Cook

    Old and Cranky

  • Members
  • 4,128 posts
    • Joined: 17-April 14

Posted 14 September 2018 - 01:00 PM

Actually, I believe it was simply a certain manufacturer's brand of brace that was ok'd, that "incidental" shouldering is ok, etc. That biceps thing is flat out stupid, and I would think that the modification of an "arm brace" to facilitate buttressing against a body part and achieving a cheek weld would forfeit the clearance of that individual's arm brace ... or what's left of it.
Back to Judicial Second Amendment Case Discussion


  1. IllinoisCarry.com
  2. → Right to Carry
  3. → Judicial Second Amendment Case Discussion
  4. Privacy Policy