mauserme Posted November 29, 2016 at 09:31 PM Author Share Posted November 29, 2016 at 09:31 PM what room is ammo serialize? Room 122. They're coming to order now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mauserme Posted November 29, 2016 at 09:31 PM Author Share Posted November 29, 2016 at 09:31 PM I think SB206 was just approved in Senate Judiciary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Talonap Posted November 29, 2016 at 09:42 PM Share Posted November 29, 2016 at 09:42 PM I think SB206 was just approved in Senate Judiciary. Did they start early? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mauserme Posted November 29, 2016 at 09:45 PM Author Share Posted November 29, 2016 at 09:45 PM It could have been a different committee - maybe I'm just anticipating the outcome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InterestedBystander Posted November 29, 2016 at 09:52 PM Share Posted November 29, 2016 at 09:52 PM I think SB206 was just approved in Senate Judiciary. Did they start early? They mave have, but I checked the feed for room400 a couple of times and never got audio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McClureOutdoor Posted November 29, 2016 at 09:55 PM Share Posted November 29, 2016 at 09:55 PM I think SB206 was just approved in Senate Judiciary. Did they start early? They mave have, but I checked the feed for room400 a couple of times and never got audio What is the link to the audio? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mauserme Posted November 29, 2016 at 09:58 PM Author Share Posted November 29, 2016 at 09:58 PM No, I probably misspoke. I was listening to the House Judiciary feed while on the phone with a client, and also had the Room 400 feed open at the same time when something was approved. Just trying to listen to too many people at the same time... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mauserme Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:00 PM Author Share Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:00 PM What is the link to the audio? Senate Room 400 House Room 122 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InterestedBystander Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:01 PM Share Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:01 PM They mave have, but I checked the feed for room400 a couple of times and never got audio What is the link to the audio? room 400 is scheduled http://www.ilga.gov/senateaudvid.asp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Talonap Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:02 PM Share Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:02 PM No, I probably misspoke. I was listening to the House Judiciary feed while on the phone with a client, and also had the Room 400 feed open at the same time when something was approved. Just trying to listen to too many people at the same time... That's why you have two ears! What's the problem? No Work related business when There's Gun Stuff on! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mauserme Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:03 PM Author Share Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:03 PM No, I probably misspoke. I was listening to the House Judiciary feed while on the phone with a client, and also had the Room 400 feed open at the same time when something was approved. Just trying to listen to too many people at the same time... That's why you have two ears! What's the problem? I need to grow a third one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChucK in IL Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:18 PM Share Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:18 PM Is anybody getting audio out of room 400? Is the meeting already over? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mauserme Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:20 PM Author Share Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:20 PM Is anybody getting audio out of room 400? Is the meeting already over? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk At the risk of being wrong again, it's just starting up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mauserme Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:27 PM Author Share Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:27 PM House Judicray has adjourned. SB206is up in Senate Judiciary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mauserme Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:27 PM Author Share Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:27 PM Senator Forby introduces the bill... Audio is low. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricky Two Guns Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:28 PM Share Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:28 PM Any word on the ammo serializing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mauserme Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:30 PM Author Share Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:30 PM Mr. Vandermyde, in response to a question, explains that the bill allows use of a suppressor for hunting and target practice. He outlines the Federal regulations that would still be in place, and the cost of obtaining a tax stamp for a suppressor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mauserme Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:32 PM Author Share Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:32 PM Again in response to a question, he states that it would be impractical to use a suppressor in conjunction with the FCCA because of the added length..The intent of the House language is to allow suppressors while hunting or on a range. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mauserme Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:34 PM Author Share Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:34 PM He adds that every manufactured suppressor is serialized and would be registered to the purchaser. They are so heavily regulated they can't be loaned to others unless the owner is physically present during its use. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mauserme Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:38 PM Author Share Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:38 PM Concerns are expressed about the possibility of Federal law (NFA) being repealed. Mr. Vandermyde respond that it would fall back to the FOID Act. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tnertb Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:39 PM Share Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:39 PM back to the kids... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mauserme Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:40 PM Author Share Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:40 PM The idea is floated that suppressors should be packaged with "some other proposal" addressing the epidemic of "gun violence". The bill is called tone deaf for the city. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FieldGL Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:40 PM Share Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:40 PM What do silencers have to do with the 600+ deaths. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mauserme Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:44 PM Author Share Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:44 PM Additional concerns are expressed about statements made publicly regarding rolling back Federal regulations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlphaKoncepts aka CGS Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:46 PM Share Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:46 PM That is indeed stupid, and lacking of sense except that they simply want to know who owns the suppressors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gearsmithy Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:47 PM Share Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:47 PM epic face palm. These antis just can't get past trying to paint legitimate gun owners as the reason for gun violence Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mauserme Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:50 PM Author Share Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:50 PM Senator Weaver(?) Haine offers balance by drawing the distinction between lawful gun owners and people who murder 9 year old children in alleys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlphaKoncepts aka CGS Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:52 PM Share Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:52 PM Kudos to weaver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gearsmithy Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:54 PM Share Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:54 PM So now they don't want to pass it because they want to use it as a bargaining chip for more gun control. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mauserme Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:54 PM Author Share Posted November 29, 2016 at 10:54 PM The idea is again brought up that some committee members would like to see this as part of a "comprehensive gun safety package". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.