Illini2A312 Posted May 25, 2018 at 12:02 AM Share Posted May 25, 2018 at 12:02 AM Possibly dumb question, but is it likely that an objection would be made over something small like a parking/red light camera ticket and/or a traffic warning (not a ticket) in Cook? Just wondering since I've heard of people having their apps sent to the Board over traffic tickets being considered "arrests" and/or Dart et. al. objecting to anyone whose name appears in a report. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WitchDoctor Posted May 25, 2018 at 12:17 AM Share Posted May 25, 2018 at 12:17 AM I live in Kook county and nothing would surprise me. I know people with much worse problems than traffic B.S. and they were not flagged.Best of luck and let us know how you make out.P.S. no dumb questions here, just the ones that don't get asked. There are some VERY knowledgeable people on this forum. I learn something every time I log on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Illini2A312 Posted May 25, 2018 at 04:17 AM Author Share Posted May 25, 2018 at 04:17 AM I live in Kook county and nothing would surprise me. I know people with much worse problems than traffic B.S. and they were not flagged.Best of luck and let us know how you make out.P.S. no dumb questions here, just the ones that don't get asked. There are some VERY knowledgeable people on this forum. I learn something every time I log on.Thanks! Yeah it just sounds concerning since I've heard the wait for board review is over a year (possibly even just to overturn something dumb). Also, how difficult are the CCL classes themselves usually? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Molly B. Posted May 25, 2018 at 01:45 PM Share Posted May 25, 2018 at 01:45 PM I have heard of Cook Co. objecting to people based on police reports but not traffic warnings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Illini2A312 Posted May 25, 2018 at 07:33 PM Author Share Posted May 25, 2018 at 07:33 PM I have heard of Cook Co. objecting to people based on police reports but not traffic warnings.Thanks, this puts me a bit more at ease. Just wanted to gauge the state of things before I decide to sink time/money into this (especially after reading about the horror stories some people have had to deal with). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aka Posted May 27, 2018 at 08:16 PM Share Posted May 27, 2018 at 08:16 PM I have heard of Cook Co. objecting to people based on police reports but not traffic warnings.I would think (OK I could be very wrong here) that the board would not allow Crook Country to object on the basis of a traffic ticket/warning unless the traffic violation resulted in a felony. But who knows.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Molly B. Posted May 27, 2018 at 10:28 PM Share Posted May 27, 2018 at 10:28 PM The board has no control over the reason an agency submits an objection. Once an objection is filed, the ISP must send it to the review board. The board then has the option of overruling or sustaining the objection. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Illini2A312 Posted May 29, 2018 at 02:06 PM Author Share Posted May 29, 2018 at 02:06 PM The board has no control over the reason an agency submits an objection. Once an objection is filed, the ISP must send it to the review board. The board then has the option of overruling or sustaining the objection.If, say, there was an objection based off of a minor offense (e.g., traffic-related), is it likely that the board would overturn this automatically, or is there a good chance you'd have to send in records/a statement (like I've heard other people have had to do)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Molly B. Posted May 29, 2018 at 02:56 PM Share Posted May 29, 2018 at 02:56 PM Board would most likely overrule something like that as soon as they saw it. They are frustrated with that stuff just like we are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Illini2A312 Posted May 29, 2018 at 05:18 PM Author Share Posted May 29, 2018 at 05:18 PM Board would most likely overrule something like that as soon as they saw it. They are frustrated with that stuff just like we are.Thanks, glad to hear there's at least some sense in this process. Was also curious about the HIPAA waiver that you apparently have to sign as part of the process. Is it likely that something like visits to a therapist/taking medications would result in an objection (despite being qualified for a FOID and never having been to alcohol treatment/rehab)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Molly B. Posted May 30, 2018 at 03:15 AM Share Posted May 30, 2018 at 03:15 AM Board would most likely overrule something like that as soon as they saw it. They are frustrated with that stuff just like we are.Thanks, glad to hear there's at least some sense in this process. Was also curious about the HIPAA waiver that you apparently have to sign as part of the process. Is it likely that something like visits to a therapist/taking medications would result in an objection (despite being qualified for a FOID and never having been to alcohol treatment/rehab)? Mental health reports are only made for someone getting treatment for a mental illness and/or is diagnosed as a danger to themselves or others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Illini2A312 Posted May 30, 2018 at 03:43 AM Author Share Posted May 30, 2018 at 03:43 AM Board would most likely overrule something like that as soon as they saw it. They are frustrated with that stuff just like we are. Thanks, glad to hear there's at least some sense in this process.Was also curious about the HIPAA waiver that you apparently have to sign as part of the process. Is it likely that something like visits to a therapist/taking medications would result in an objection (despite being qualified for a FOID and never having been to alcohol treatment/rehab)? Mental health reports are only made for someone getting treatment for a mental illness and/or is diagnosed as a danger to themselves or others.Got it, thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Illini2A312 Posted September 24, 2018 at 04:37 PM Author Share Posted September 24, 2018 at 04:37 PM Mental health reports are only made for someone getting treatment for a mental illness and/or is diagnosed as a danger to themselves or others.Just re-read this and wanted to clarify, I assume "treatment" here strictly means inpatient treatment (just like in the FOID act)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.